Dual language immersion programs are growing in popularity across America. This article examines the explanations middle-class parents of various racial/ethnic backgrounds give for enrolling their children in Mandarin Immersion Programs. The author addresses the following questions: Why do American parents enroll their children in Mandarin Immersion Programs? How do parents from different racial groups frame the benefits of immersion? The analysis relies on a mixed-method approach using survey data (N = 500) to highlight motivations of parents without an ethnic background related to the language, supplemented with 15 semi-structured interviews with Black and White parents of children enrolled in schools with Mandarin Immersion Programs. The study finds that parents frame the benefits of an educational investment differently by race. White parents take a pragmatic stance of greater future returns while Black parents hope immersion will help construct a stronger self-identity. These findings show the influence a burgeoning global society has on parental educational choices.
AltenhofenS.BerendsM.WhiteT. G. (2016). School choice decision making among suburban, high-income parents. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–14.
2.
BallS. J.VincentC. (1998). ‘I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘Hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.
3.
BialystokE. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BialystokE. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism, 12(1), 3–11.
5.
BosettiL.PyrytM. C. (2007). Parental motivation in school choice: Seeking the competitive edge. Journal of School Choice, 1(4), 89–108.
6.
California Department of Education (2019). Data and Statistics. Retrieved July16, 2020, from https://www.cde.ca.gov
7.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
8.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
9.
DavisT. M.WelcherA. N. (2013). School quality and the vulnerability of the Black middle class: The continuing significance of race as a predictor of disparate schooling environments. Sociological Perspectives, 56(4), 467–493.
10.
DiamondJ. B. (2006). Still separate and unequal: Examining race, opportunity, and school achievement in “integrated” suburbs. The Journal of Negro Education, 75, 495–505.
11.
EeJ. (2017). Two dimensions of parental involvement: What affects parental involvement in dual language immersion?Bilingual Research Journal, 40(2), 131–153.
12.
EeJ. (2018). Exploring Korean dual language immersion programs in the United States: Parents’ reasons for enrolling their children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(6), 690–709.
13.
FaltzC. J.LeakeD. O. (1996). The all-Black school: Inherently unequal or a culture-based alternative. Beyond Desegregation: The Politics of Quality in African American Schooling (1st edition) 227–252.
14.
FelicianoC. (2005). Does selective migration matter? Explaining ethnic disparities in educational attainment among immigrants’ children. International Migration Review, 39(4), 841–871.
15.
FelicianoC. (2006). Beyond the family: The influence of premigration group status on the educational expectations of immigrants’ children. Sociology of Education, 79(4), 281–303.
16.
FordhamS. (1988). Racelessness as a factor in Black students’ school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory?Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 54–85.
17.
FordhamS.OgbuJ. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’”. The Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206.
18.
GoldringE. B.Hoover-DempseyK. V.RowleyK.PachuckiL. (2004). Voluntary integration and magnet schools under unitary status. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
19.
GoyetteK. A. (2008). Race, social background, and school choice options. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(1), 114–129.
20.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G.BranchG. F. (2007). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5–6), 823–848.
21.
HolmeJ. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177–206.
22.
HolmeJ. J.FrankenbergE.DiemS.WeltonA. D. (2013). School choice in suburbia: The impact of choice policies on the potential for suburban integration. Journal of School Choice, 7(2), 113–141.
23.
HoxbyC. M. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence from the United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 11-67.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Brookings Inst Press.
26.
JiménezT. R.HorowitzA. L. (2013). When white is just alright: How immigrants redefine achievement and reconfigure the ethnoracial hierarchy. American Sociological Review, 78(5), 849–871.
27.
JiménezT. R.HorowitzA. L. (2015). Whitewashing academic mediocrity. Contexts, 14(3), 38–43.
28.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
29.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
30.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.
31.
LareauA.GoyetteK. (Eds.) (2014). Choosing homes, choosing schools. Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
LazarukW. (2007). Linguistic, academic, and cognitive benefits of French immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(5), 605–627.
33.
LeeJ.ZhouM. (2014). The success frame and achievement paradox: The costs and consequences for Asian Americans. Race and Social Problems, 6(1), 38–55.
34.
LeeJ. S. (2002). The Korean language in America: The role of cultural identity in heritage language learning. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 117–133.
35.
LewisA. E. (2001). There is no “race” in the schoolyard: Color-blind ideology in an (almost) all-white school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 781–811.
36.
Lewis-McCoyR. H. (2014). Inequality in the promised land: Race, resources, and suburban schooling. Stanford University Press.
37.
Lindholm-LearyK.BlockN. (2010). Achievement in predominantly low SES/Hispanic dual language schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 43–60.
38.
MerollaD. M.JacksonO. (2019). Structural racism as the fundamental cause of the academic achievement gap. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1–13.
39.
MerryM. S.NewW. (2008). Constructing an authentic self: The challenges and promise of African-centered pedagogy. American Journal of Education, 115(1), 35–64.
40.
MetM.LivaccariC. (2012). Basics of Chinese immersion program design. In Asia Society (Ed.) Chinese language learning in the early grades: A handbook of resources and best practices for Mandarin immersion (pp. 16–21).
41.
MickelsonR. A.BottiaM.SouthworthS. (2008). School choice and segregation by race, class, and achievement. National Education Policy Center.
42.
MuroJ. A. (2016). “Oil and water”? Latino-white relations and symbolic integration in a changing California. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 2(4), 516–530.
43.
OgbuJ. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Routledge.
44.
OkonofuaJ. A.EberhardtJ. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26(5), 617–624.
45.
Olson BealH. K.HendryP. M. (2012). The ironies of school choice: Empowering parents and reconceptualizing public education. American Journal of Education, 118(4), 521–550.
46.
OsyermanD.GantL.AgerJ. (1995). A socially contextualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1216.
47.
ParkS. M.SarkarM. (2007). Parents’ attitudes toward heritage language maintenance for their children and their efforts to help their children maintain the heritage language: A case study of Korean-Canadian immigrants. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 20(3), 223–235.
48.
PattilloM. (2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the Black community. Du Bois Review, 12(1), 41–71.
PoliteV. C. (1993). If only we knew then what we know now: Foiled opportunities to learn in suburbia. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 337–354.
51.
RenzulliL. A.EvansL. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and white flight. Social Problems, 52(3), 398–418.
52.
RielV.ParcelT. L.MickelsonR. A.SmithS. S. (2018). Do magnet and charter schools exacerbate or ameliorate inequality?Sociology Compass, 12(9), 1-15.
53.
RodaA.WellsA. S. (2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where white parents’ good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 261–293.
54.
SamsonF. L. (2013). Multiple group threat and malleable White attitudes towards academic merit. Du Bois Review, 10(1), 233–260.
55.
SaporitoS. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181–203.
56.
SaporitoS.SohoniD. (2007). Mapping educational inequality: Concentrations of poverty among poor and minority students in public schools. Social Forces, 85(3), 1227–1253.
57.
SikkinkD.EmersonM. O. (2008). School choice and racial segregation in US schools: The role of parents’ education. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(2), 267–293.
58.
SmalaS.PazJ. B.LingardB. (2013). Languages, cultural capital and school choice: Distinction and second-language immersion programmes. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 373–391.
59.
SmrekarC.GoldringE. (1999). School Choice in Urban America: Magnet Schools and the Pursuit of Equity. Critical Issues in Educational Leadership Series. Teachers College Press.
60.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–829.
StulbergL. M. (2015). African American school choice and the current race politics of charter schooling: Lessons from history. Race and Social Problems, 7(1), 31–42.
63.
Taylor HaynesK.PhillipsK. J.GoldringE. B. (2010). Latino parents’ choice of magnet school: How school choice differs across racial and ethnic boundaries. Education and Urban Society, 42(6), 758–789.
64.
VincentC.RollockN.BallS.GillbornD. (2012). Being strategic, being watchful, being determined: Black middle-class parents and schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(3), 337–354.
65.
Watzinger-TharpJ.SwensonK.MayneZ. (2018). Academic achievement of students in dual language immersion. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(8), 913–928.
66.
WeltonA. D.DiemS.HolmeJ. J. (2015). Color conscious, cultural blindness: Suburban school districts and demographic change. Education and Urban Society, 47(6), 695–722.
67.
WoodyA. (2020). “They want the Spanish but they don’t want the Mexicans”: Whiteness and consumptive contact in an Oregon Spanish immersion school. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(1), 92–106.
68.
YanceyG. A. (2003). Who is white? Latinos, Asians, and the new black/nonblack divide. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
69.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
70.
YoungR. L.TranM. T. (1999). Vietnamese parent attitudes toward bilingual education. Bilingual Research Journal, 23(2–3), 225–233.
71.
ZhangD.Slaughter-DefoeD. T. (2009). Language attitudes and heritage language maintenance among Chinese immigrant families in the USA. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 22(2), 77–93.
