In this study, the researchers examined the five most recent years of data (2003-2004 through 2007-2008) from the Academic Excellence Indicator System of the State of Texas regarding new teachers on elementary school campuses. We examined the extent to which differences were present between elementary school campuses with the highest new teacher percentages and elementary school campuses with the lowest new teacher percentages. In every case for all 5 years, elementary school campuses with the highest percentages of new teachers had the highest percentages of minority students, highest percentages of economically disadvantaged students, and highest percentages of at-risk students than did elementary school campuses with the lowest percentages of new teachers. Implications of these findings and suggestions for further research are discussed.
BormanG. D.DowlingN. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 367-409.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Darling-HammondL. (1998, September). How can we ensure a caring, competent, qualified teacher for every child?National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future. Paper presented at the American Federation of Teachers/National Education Association Joint Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://www.middleweb.com/TchRcrtLDH.html
8.
DePaulA. (2000). Survival guide for new teachers. U.S. Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved March 24, 2009, from http://ed.gov/pubs/survivalguide/
HirschE.EmerickS.ChurchK.FullerE. (2006). Working conditions survey report: Kansas. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
11.
IngersollR. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
12.
IngersollR. M. (2001a). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
13.
IngersollR. M. (2001b). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
14.
IngersollR. M. (2002). Out-of-field teaching, educational inequality, and the organization of schools: An exploration analysis. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
15.
IngersollR. M. (2003a). Is there really a teacher shortage?Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
16.
IngersollR. M. (2003b). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
17.
IngersollR. M.SmithT. M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.
18.
JepsenC.RivkinS. (2002). Class size reduction, teacher quality, and academic achievement in California public elementary public schools. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED497298).
19.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Monitoring school quality: An indicators report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. National Center for Education Statistics.
20.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2002). Unraveling the “teacher shortage” problem: Teacher retention is the key. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
NietoS. M. (2003). Going?Educational Leadership, 60(8), 15-18.
22.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. The Civil Rights Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489186).
ProvasnikS.DorfmanS. (2005). Mobility in the teacher workforce (NCES 2005-114). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
RowlandC.CobleC. (2005, November). Targeting teacher recruitment and retention policies for at-risk schools. (Policy Issues No. 20). North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489524).
28.
StansburyK.ZimmermanJ. (2000). Lifelines to the classroom: Designing support for beginning teachers (U.S. Dept of Education No. RJ96006901). San Francisco: WestEd.
