Fostering College Readiness: An Ethnography of a Latina/o Afterschool Program

Abstract

There are two, related types of college readiness: (a) cognitive—students’ test scores and grades and (b) noncognitive—students’ academic mind-sets, behaviors, and motivation. This study uses an ethnographic approach to examine how an afterschool program for Latina/o high school youth fosters noncognitive factors of college readiness. Based on over 80 hr of participant observation and 31 semistructured interviews, this work demonstrates how an afterschool program acts as a supplement to students’ noncognitive factors of college readiness. The findings also suggest that afterschool programs for high school youth can act as hubs of behavioral nudges toward noncognitive college readiness and access.

Keywords

urban education students multicultural education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afterschool Alliance. (2014). About the Afterschool Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/aboutus.cfm

American Counseling Association. (2013). United States student-to-counselor ratios for elementary and secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/public-policy-faqs-and-documents/2013-counselor-to-student-ratio-chart.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Anyon

(2014). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Apsler

(2008). After-school programs for adolescents: A review of evaluation research. Adolescence, 44(173), 1-19.

Bandura

(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.

Becker

H. S.

Geer

(1957). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison. Human Organization, 16(3), 28-32.

Bettinger

E. P.

Baker

(2014). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 3-19.

Bogdan

Biklen

S. K.

(2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Castleman

B. L.

Page

L. C.

(2015). Summer nudging: Can personalized text messages and peer mentor outreach increase college going among low-income high school graduates? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 144-160.

10.

Conley

D. T.

(2007). Redefining college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.

11.

Cooper

K. S.

(2013). Safe, affirming, and productive spaces: Classroom engagement among Latina high school students. Urban Education, 48, 490-528.

12.

Cosden

Morrison

Albanese

A. L.

Macias

(2001). When homework is not homework: After-school programs for homework assistance. Educational Psychologist, 36, 211-221.

13.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

14.

Duckworth

A. L.

Peterson

Matthews

M. D.

Kelly

D. R.

(2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101.

15.

Durlak

J. A.

Weissberg

R. P.

(2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Available from www.casel.org

16.

Dynarski

(2015, January 17). Helping the poor in education: The power of a simple nudge (cites research by Eric Bettinger and Susanna Loeb). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/upshot/helping-the-poor-in-higher-education-the-power-of-a-simple-nudge.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=1

17.

Emerson

R. M.

Fretz

R. I.

Shaw

L. L.

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Farrington

C. A.

Roderick

Allensworth

Nagaoka

Keyes

T. S.

Johnson

D. W.

Beechum

N. O.

(2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/teaching-adolescents-become-learners-role-noncognitive-factors-shaping-school

19.

Fry

R. A.

(2005). The high schools Hispanics attend: Size and other key characteristics. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

20.

George

Cusick

G. R.

Wasserman

Gladden

R. M.

(2007). After-school programs and academic impact: A study of Chicago’s after-school matters. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children.

21.

Glaser

B. S.

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, England: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

22.

Gottfredson

D. C.

Cross

Soule

D. A.

(2007). Distinguishing characteristics of effective and ineffective after-school programs to prevent delinquency and victimization. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 289-318.

23.

Halpern

(2002). A different kind of child development institution: The history of after-school programs for low-income children. The Teachers College Record, 104, 178-211.

24.

Harris

D. M.

Kiyama

J. M.

(2015). The role of school and community-based programs in aiding Latina/o high school persistence. Education and Urban Society, 47, 182-206. doi:10.1177/0013124513495274

25.

Hipps

Diaz

Wingren

(2007). California 21st Century High School After School Safety and Enrichment for Teens (ASSETs) program. Interim Report. Sacramento, CA: WestEd.

26.

Hollister

R. G.

(2003). The growth in after-school programs and their impact. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

27.

Huang

Kim

K. S.

Marshall

Pérez

(2005). Keeping kids in school: An LA’s BEST example—A study examining the long-term impact of LA’s BEST on students’ dropout rates. Technical Report. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CREEST).

28.

Immordino-Yang

M. H.

Damasio

(2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 1-10.

29.

Jarsky

K. M.

McDonough

P. M.

Núñez

A.-M.

(2009). Establishing a college culture in secondary schools through P-20 collaboration: A case study. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8, 357-373.

30.

Kane

T. J.

(2004). The impact of after-school programs: Interpreting the results of four recent evaluations (Working paper). New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.

31.

Krogstad

(2015, May 26). 5 facts about Latinos and education. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/26/5-facts-about-latinos-and-education/

32.

Lincoln

Guba

E. G.

(1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In William

(Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation: New directions for program evaluation (No. 30, pp. 73-84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

33.

Malecki

C. K.

Elliot

S. N.

(2002). Children’s social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(1), 1-23.

34.

Maxfield

Schirm

Rodriguez-Planas

(2003). The Quantum Opportunities Program demonstration: Implementation and short-term impacts. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.

35.

McDonough

P. M.

(2005). Counseling matters: Knowledge, assistance, and organizational commitment in college preparation. In Tierney

W. G.

Corwin

Z. B.

Colyar

J. E.

(Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 69-87). Albany: State University of New York Press.

36.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

37.

Oyserman

Destin

(2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 1001-1043.

38.

Posner

J. K.

Vandell

D. L.

(1994). Low income children’s after school care: Are there beneficial effects of after-school programs? Child Development, 65, 440-456.

39.

Reid

M. J.

Moore

J. L.

(2008). College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education, 43, 240-261.

40.

Riggs

N. R.

Bohnert

A. M.

Guzman

M. D.

Davidson

(2010). Examining the potential of community-based after-school programs for Latino youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 417-429.

41.

Riggs

N. R.

Greenberg

M. T.

(2004). After-school youth development programs: A developmental-ecological model of current research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7, 177-190.

42.

Roffman

J. G.

Pagano

M. E.

Hirsch

B. J.

(2001). Youth functioning and experiences in inner-city after-school programs among age, gender, and race groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 85-100.

43.

Rotter

(1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.

44.

Scott-Little

Hamann

M. S.

Jurs

S. G.

(2002). Evaluations of after-school programs: A meta-evaluation of methodologies and narrative synthesis of findings. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 387-419.

45.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

(2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43, 1066-1109.

46.

Thaler

Sunstein

(2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

47.

Valencia

R. R.

(2002). The plight of Chicano students: An overview of schooling conditions and outcomes. In Valencia

R. R.

(Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (2nd ed., pp. 3-41). New York, NY: Routledge.

48.

Vandell

D. L.

(2013). Afterschool program quality and student outcomes: Reflections on positive key findings on learning and development from recent research. In Peterson

(Ed.), Expanding and opportunities: Leveraging the power of after-school and summer learning for student success (pp. 10-16). Retrieved from http://www.expandinglearning.org/sites/default/files/expandingminds_section_3_0.pdf

49.

Wiley

Wyatt

Camara

W. J.

(2010). The development of a multidimensional college readiness index (Research Report No. 2010-3). New York, NY: The College Board. Retrieved from https://research.collegeboard.org/publications/content/2012/05/development-multidimensional-college-readiness-index

50.

Wong

N. W. A.

(2008). “They see us as resource”: The role of a community-based youth center in supporting the academic lives of low-income Chinese American youth. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 39, 181-204.

51.

Wong

N. W. A.

(2010). “Cuz they care about the people who goes there”: The multiple roles of a community-based youth center in providing “youth (comm)unity” for low-income Chinese American youth. Urban Education, 45, 708-739.

52.

Woodland

M. H.

(2008). Whatcha doin’after school? A review of the literature on the influence of after-school programs on young Black males. Urban Education, 43, 537-560.