Focusing on a cohort of high school students from a Midwest metropolitan region, this study combines multiple sources of data and uses a multinomial logistic regression to model student postsecondary choices with respect to whether and where to attend college. Specifically, we examined the enrollment patterns by proximity to the home region and factors associated with these college decisions. The results suggest that these students’ college choices were a process influenced by both precollege individual characteristics and social contexts. The findings also supported our hypothesis that acquisition of various types of capital and academic success of the school district (as one of several indicators of a college-going culture) were negatively related to student preferences for college proximity. These findings highlight the interplay between individual, family, community, and school at different levels as it influences college decisions of students from the deindustrialized Midwest region and regions alike.
AnB. P. (2010). The relations between race, family characteristics, and where students apply to college. Social Science Research, 39, 310-323.
2.
BarnettE. A.HughesK. (2010). Community college and high school partnerships. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
3.
BeckerG. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
BlancoC. D. (2005). Early commitment financial aid programs: Promises, practices, and policies. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
5.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), The handbook of theory: Research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
6.
BowenW. G.BokD. (1998). The shape of the river: Long term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BowenW. G.BrenemanD. W. (1993). Student aid: Price discount or educational investment? In BrenemanD.LeslieL. L.AndersonR. E. (Eds.), Finance in higher education (ASHE Reader Series) (pp. 303-307). Needbury Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
8.
BuchmannC.DiPreteT.McDanielA. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319-337.
9.
CabreraA. F.La NasaS. M. (2000). Understanding the college-choice process. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(107), 5-22.
10.
CarnevaleA. P.RoseS. J. (2004). Socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and selective college admissions. In KahlenbergR. D. (Ed.), America’s untapped resource: Low-income students in higher education (pp. 101-156). New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press.
11.
CarnevaleA. P.StrohlJ. (2013). Separate and unequal: How higher education reinforces the intergenerational reproduction of White racial privilege. Washington, DC: Georgetown Public Policy Institute and the Center on Education and the Workforce.
12.
CejaM. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as information sources in the college choice process of Chicana students. The Journal of College Student Development, 47, 87-104.
13.
ChapmanD. (1981). A model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 490-505.
14.
ChengD.ReedM. (2010, October). Student debt and the class of 2009. Oakland, CA: The Institute for College Access & Success.
15.
ChengS.LongS. (2007). Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 583-600.
16.
ChoS.HudleyC.LeeS.BarryL.KellyM. (2008). Roles of gender, race, and SES in the college choice process among first-generation and nonfirst-generation students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 95-107.
17.
ChoyS. P.CarrollC. D. (2000). Debt burden four years after college. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC.
18.
ColemanJ. C. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
CottonK. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
21.
CottonK. (2001). New small learning communities: Findings from recent literature. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
22.
Darling-HammondL.RossP.MillikenM. (2006). High school size, organization, and content: What matters for student success?Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 9, 163-203.
23.
DekeJ. (2003). A study of the impact of public school spending on postsecondary educational attainment using statewide school district refinancing in Kansas. Economics of Education Review, 22, 275-284.
EatonS. (2001). The other Boston busing story: What’s won and lost across the boundary line. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
EngbergM. E.WolniakG. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 132-153.
27.
EspinozaR. (2010). The good daughter dilemma: Latinas managing family and school demands. Journal of Latina/o Higher Education, 9, 317-330.
28.
Farmer-HintonR. (2006). On becoming college prep: Examining the challenges staff members face in executing a school’s mission. Teachers College Record, 108, 1214-1240.
29.
FryR. (2013). Hispanic high school graduates pass Whites in rate of college enrollment. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
30.
GeraldD.HaycockK. (2006). Engines of inequality: Diminishing equity in the nation’s premier public universities. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
31.
GobleL. (2010, August). Should I stay or should I go? The role of college proximity for student success. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.
32.
GoldinC. K.KatzL. F.KuziemkoI. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap (NBER Working Papers No. 12139). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
33.
GreenwaldR.HedgesL. V.LaineR. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
34.
GullattY.JanW. (2003). How do pre-collegiate academic outreach programs impact college-going among underrepresented students. Washington, DC: Pathways to College Network Clearinghouse.
35.
HanushekE. A. (2001). Spending on schools. In MoeT. (Ed.), A primer on American education (pp. 69-88). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
36.
HosslerD. (2000). The problem with college rankings. About Campus, 5, 20-24.
37.
HosslerD.SchmitJ.VesperN. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
JussimL. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review, 93, 429-445.
39.
KellyH. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In SwansonG. E.NewcombT. M.HartleyE. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 410-414). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
40.
KennyM. E.DonaldsonG. A. (1991). Contributions of parental attachment and family structure to the social and psychological functioning of first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 479-486.
41.
KimD. (2004). The effect of financial aid on students’ college choice: Differences by racial groups. Research in Higher Education, 45, 43-70.
42.
KittleB.CibaD. (2001). Using college web sites for student recruitment: A relationship marketing study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11(3), 17-37.
43.
KonstantopoulosS.HedgesL. V. (2008). How large an effect can we expect from school reforms?Teachers College Record, 110, 1611-1638.
44.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of structure and action. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
45.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
46.
MaddoxJ. G. (1960). Private and social costs of the movement of people out of agriculture. The American Economic Review, 50, 392-402.
47.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
McDonoughP. M. (1998). Structuring college opportunities: A cross-case analysis of organizational cultures, climates, and habiti. In TorresC. A.MitchellH. R. (Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives (pp. 181-210). Albany: State University of New York Press.
49.
McDonoughP. M.AntonioA. L. (1996, April). Ethnic and racial differences in selectivity of college choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
50.
MurdockG. P.ProvostC. (1973). Factors in the division of labor by sex: A cross-cultural analysis. Ethnology, 12, 203-225.
51.
NelsonJ. I. (1972). Context and college plans: The impact of social structure on aspirations. American Sociological Review, 37, 143-148.
52.
NewmanD. A. (2003). Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: A simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 328-339.
53.
NogueraP. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
54.
NuñezA. M.KimD. (2012). Building a multicontextual model of Latino college enrollment: Student, school, and state-level effects. The Review of Higher Education, 35, 237-263.
55.
O’ConnorN.HammackF. M.ScottM. A. (2010). Social capital, financial knowledge, and Latina/o student college choices. Research in Higher Education, 51, 195-219.
56.
PaulsenM. B.St. JohnE. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 189-239.
57.
PaulsenM. B.ToutkoushianR. K. (2008). Economic models and policy analysis in higher education: A diagrammatic exposition. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXIII, pp. 1-48). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
58.
PérezP. A.McDonoughP. M. (2008). Understanding Latina and Latino college choice: A social capital and chain migration analysis. Journal of Latina/o Higher Education, 7, 249-265.
59.
PernaL. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99-157). New York, NY: Springer Press.
60.
PernaL. W.TitusM. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 485-518.
61.
PlankS. B.JordanW. J. (2001). Effects of information, guidance, and actions on postsecondary destinations: A study of talent loss. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 947-979.
62.
PrimoD. M.JacobsmeierM. L.MilyoJ. (2007). Estimating the impact of state policies and institutions with mixed-level data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 446-459.
63.
Rowan-KenyonH. T. (2007). Predictors of delayed college enrollment and the impact of socioeconomic status. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 188-214.
64.
RoystonP.CarlinJ. B.WhiteJ. R. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: New features for MIM. Stata Journal, 9, 252-264.
65.
SchwartzA. (1973). Interpreting the effect of distance on migration. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1153-1169.
66.
SorokouC.WeissbrodC. S. (2005). Men and women’s attachment & contact patterns with parents during the first year of college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 221-228.
67.
SribneyB. (1998). What are the advantages of using the robust variance estimator over the standard maximum-likelihood variance estimator in logistic regression? Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/robust_var.html
68.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata longitudinal-data/panel-data reference manual release 13. College Stations, TX: Author.
69.
SteenbergenM. R.JonesB. S. (2002). Modeling multilvel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 218-237.
70.
St. JohnE. P.KirshsteinP.NoellJ. (1991). The effects of student aid on persistence: A sequential analysis of the high school and beyond senior cohort. Review of Higher Education, 14, 383-406.
71.
St. JohnE. P.MeyerH. D. (2013). Reconciling efficiency with excellence and fairness. In MeyerH. D.St. JohnE. P.ChankselianiM.UribeL. (Eds.), Fairness in access to higher education in a global perspective (pp. 289-307). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
72.
St. JohnE. P.PaulsenM. B.CarterD. F. (2005). Diversity, college costs, and postsecondary opportunity: An examination of the financial nexus between college choice and persistence for African Americans and whites. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 545-569.
73.
SyS. R.RomeroJ. (2008). Family responsibilities among Latina college students from immigrant families. Journal of Latina/o Higher Education, 7, 212-227.
74.
TeranishiR.AllenW. R.SolorzanoD. G. (2004). Opportunity at the crossroads: Racial inequality, school segregation, and higher education in California. Teachers College Record, 106, 2224-2245.
75.
TerenziniP. T.CabereraA. F.BernalE. M. (2001). Swimming against the tide: The poor in American higher education. Washington, DC: The College Board.
76.
TierneyW. G.ColyarJ. E. (2005). The role of peer groups in college preparation programs. In TierneyW. G.CorwinZ. B.ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparation for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 46-68). Albany: State University of New York Press.
77.
TierneyW. G.CorwinZ. B.ColyarJ. E. (2005). Preparation for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
78.
TurleyR. N. L. (2006). When parents want children to stay home for college. Research in Higher Education, 47, 823-846.
79.
TurleyR. N. L. (2009). College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociology of Education, 82, 126-146.
80.
VegaW. A. (1990). Latina/o families in the 1980s: A decade of research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 1015-1024.
