The purpose of the study was to compare and contrast influences principals have on staffing, curriculum issues, and discipline policies in high- and low-performing urban high schools. The data for the present study were drawn from the first year follow up of the Educational Longitudinal Survey of 2002-2004 (ELS: 02), administered by the National Center for Educational Statistics. Of the 14,000 school administrators surveyed, only high-and low-performing urban high schools were included for this study. The results of this study revealed four areas where principals differed in their perceptions of their individual influences on academic achievement at their respective schools. Principals from high achieving urban school tend to have more influence on hiring and firing teaching staff and curriculum issues, such as course offerings and curricular guidelines. Principals from low achieving schools have more influence on school funding.
AllingtonR. L.JohnsonP. H. (Eds.). (2002). Reading to learn: Lessons from exemplary 4th grade classrooms. New York, NY: Guilford.
2.
BakerB.CooperB. (2005). Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire better teachers? Policy implications for improving high-poverty schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 449-479. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269609.
3.
BalfanzR.Mac IverD. (2000). Transforming high-poverty urban middle schools into strong learning institutions: Lessons from the first five years of Talent Development middle school. Journal of Education for Students At Risk, 5(1&2), 137-158.
4.
BarthR. S. (2001). Learning by heart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BartonP. E. (2002). Staying on course in education reform. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6.
BellL. (2003). Strategies that close the gap. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 32-34. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ659149)
7.
BlaséJ. (1987). Dimensions of effective school leadership: The teacher’s perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 589-610.
8.
BloomC. M.ErlandsonD. A. (2003). African American women principals in urban schools: Realities (re) constructions, and resolutions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 339-369.
9.
ChoyS. P.HenkeR. R.AltM. N.MedrichE. A.BobbittS. A. (1993). Schools and staffing in the united states: A statistical profile, 1990-91 (NCES Report No. 93-146). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
10.
ClarkM. A.BrooksM.LeeS.DaleyL. PCrawfordY. (2006). Factors influencing the educational success of minority pre-service educators. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 121-135.
11.
Cole-HendersonB. (2000). Organizational characteristics of schools that successfully serve low-income urban African American students. Journal of Education for Students Placed At-Risk, 5(1&2), 77-91.
12.
CoplanM. (2001). The myth of the superprincipal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 582-533.
13.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
CubanL. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
15.
DalakerJ.NaifehM. (1998). Poverty in the United States: 1997. Current population reports (Series P60-201). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
DaviesD. (2002). The 10th school revisited: Are school/family/community partnerships on the reform agenda now?Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 388-392.
17.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
18.
DeschenesS.CubanL.TyackD. (2001). Mismatch: Historical perspectives on schools and students who don’t fit them. Teachers College Record, 103(4), 525.
19.
EdmondsR. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
20.
ElmoreR. F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
GlickmanC. (1987). Good and/or effective schools: What do we want?Kappan, 68(8), 622-624.
23.
GlickmanC. (2010). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
24.
GoertzM. E. (2001). Refining government roles in an era of standard-based reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 62-55.
25.
GoertzM. E. (2005). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Challenges for the States. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 73-89.
26.
GordonS. P. (2002). The good school. Florida Journal of Educational Leadership, 1(2), 13-15.
27.
HallingerP. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. College of Management, Mahidol University, Thailand.
28.
HanushekE. A. (2005). Why quality matters in education. Finance & Development, 42(2), 15-19.
29.
HoyW. K.MiskelC. G. (Eds.). (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30.
HoyW. K.SweetlandS. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296-321.
31.
JeffreyT. (2007). School leadership that works: From research to results. Roeper Review, 29(4), 285.
32.
JoyceB. (1991). The doors to school improvement. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 59-62.
33.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York, NY: Crown.
34.
KozolJ. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York, NY: Corwin.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers. Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
LeanaC. R.PilF. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organizational Science, 17(3), 353-366.
38.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York, NY: The Education School Project.
39.
LewinK.LippettR.WhiteR. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.”Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
40.
LewisA.BednarekD.Chion-KenneyL.HarrisonC.KolodzyJ.McCormickK.. . . WalkerL. (1989). Wolves at the schoolhouse door: An investigation of the condition of public school buildings. Washington, DC: Education Writers Association.
41.
LezotteL.JacobyB. (1990). The school improvement process based on effective schools research: A guide. Ann Arbor: Michigan Institute for Educational Management.
42.
LicataJ.TeddlieC.GreenfieldW. (1990). Principal vision, teacher sense of autonomy, and environmental robustness. Journal of Educational Research, 84(2), 93.
43.
LikertR. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
44.
LindblomC. E. (1977). Politics and markets. New York, NY: Basic Books.
45.
LippmanL.BurnsS.McArthurE. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
LunenburgF. C.OrnsteinA. C. (2008). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson.
48.
MarzanoR.KendallJ., National Association of State Boards of Education, & Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab. (1997). The fall and rise of standards-based education. Issues in brief. Retrieved from ERIC database.
49.
McLaughlinM.TalbertJ. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
MeierE. (2005). Situating technology professional development in urban schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(4), 395-407.
51.
MollL. C.GonzalezN. (1997). Teachers as social scientists: Learning about culture from household research. In HallP. M. (Ed.), Race, ethnicity and multiculturalism (pp. 89-114). New York: Garland.
52.
MurphyJ. (1992). Effective schools: Legacy and future directions. In ReynoldsD.CuttanceP. (Eds.), School effectiveness: Research, policy, and practice (pp. 164-170). London: Cassell.
53.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS: 2002). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/
54.
National Partnership for Teaching in At-Risk Schools, (2005). Qualified teachers for at-risk schools: A national imperative. Washington, DC: National Partnership for Teaching in At-Risk Schools.
55.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2002). Standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and Supervisors. Austin, TX: Author
NoddingsN. (2003). Is teaching a practice?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37, 241-251. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00323
58.
OlsonL.JeraldC. D. (1998). The achievement gap. Education Week Quality Counts, 17(17), 11-13.
59.
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE.LeeC. (2002). The resurgence of school segregation. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 16. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
60.
PurkeyS. C.SmithM. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-452.
61.
ReyesA. (2006). Discipline, achievement, and race: Is zero tolerance the answer?Lanham: MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
62.
RosenholtzS. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 376.
63.
ScheerensJ.BoskerR. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Permagon.
64.
SchmokerM. (2002). Up and away. Journal of staff development, 23(2), 1-8.
65.
SergiovanniT. J.StarrattR. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
66.
SmithM. S.O’DayJ. A. (1991). Systemic school reform. In FuhrmanS. H.MalenB. (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). London: Falmer.
67.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2006). Schools can’t wait: Accelerating the redesign of university principal preparation programs. Atlanta, GA: Author.
68.
SpillaneJ. P.HallettT.DiamondJ. B. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1-17.
69.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
StogdillR. M.CoonsA. E. (Eds.). (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.
72.
StollL.TemperleyJ. (2009). Creative leadership: A challenge of our times. School Leadership and Management, 29(1), 65-78.
73.
TaylorB. (2002). The effective schools process: Alive and well. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 375.
74.
TaylorB. M.PearsonP. D.PetersonD. S.RodriguezM. C. (2005). The CIERA school change framework; An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 2-32.
75.
TylerR. W. (1987). Education reforms. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(4), 277-280.
76.
WaxmanH.PadronY. (1995). Improving the quality of classroom instruction for students at risk of failure in urban schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 44-65.
77.
Wharton-McDonaldR.PressleyM.HamptonJ. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 99, 101-128.
