Revisiting the Multi-Tiered System of Supports Framework: An Important Mechanism for Realizing Equitable Education in Urban Schools

Abstract

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) framework was established as a comprehensive, equitable approach for addressing urban students’ academic, behavioral, and social-emotional needs. Still, confusion surrounded its implementation. On returning to in-person instruction, urban educators have been challenged to resurrect their school’s MTSS framework while simultaneously confronting many other issues, such as increased student absenteeism, academic achievement deficits, and staffing shortages. Consequently, revisiting this matter is warranted, particularly concerning operating MTSS frameworks in high-poverty urban schools. Accordingly, this paper explains the design and operation of an MTSS and then discusses its historical evolution and current relevance. Next, the article identifies drivers of well-functioning MTSS frameworks while discussing the circumstances surrounding high-poverty urban schools. The paper concludes with a discussion of a core component of an MTSS framework that urban educators have identified as one for which they need more information: intensifying instruction. Properly addressing this component will equip urban educators with the foundational knowledge they need to design and implement an MTSS framework tailored to their unique circumstances.

Keywords

urban education school improvement accountability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Wills

(2012). Improving the upside-down response-to-intervention triangle with a systematic, effective elementary school reading team. Preventing School Failure, 56(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455988X.2011.555793

Arham

Stembrige Fergus

Noguera

(n.d.). Framing urban challenges: The problems to exam when implementing response to intervention. RTI Action Network, National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://rtinetwork.org/component/content/article/12/465-framing-urban-school

Austin

(Host). (2022). Using the data you already have to help students with dyslexia [Audio podcast episode]. In EDVIEW 360 podcast series. https://www.voyagersopris.com/podcasts/2022/using-the-data-you-already-have-to-help-students-with-dyslexia

Bailey

T. R.

(2018). Is MTSS/RTI here to stay? All signs point to yes! National Center on Response to Intervention. https://rti4success.org/blog/mtssrti-here-stay-all-signs-point-yes

Bailey

T. R.

Chan

Lembke

E. S.

(2019). Aligning intensive intervention and special education with multi-tiered systems of support. In Edmonds

R. Z.

Gandhi

A. G.

Danielson

(Eds.), Essentials of intensive intervention (pp. 136–153). Guilford Press.

Braun

Kumm

Brown

Walte

Hughes

M. T.

Maggin

D. M.

(2018). Living in tier 2: Educators’ perceptions of MTSS in urban schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24, 1114–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1511758

Danielson

Edmonds

R. Z.

Gandhi

A. G.

(2019). Introduction. In Edmonds

R. Z.

Gandhi

A. G.

Danielson

(Eds.), Essentials of intensive intervention (pp. 1–6). The Guilford Press.

Duncan

Brown

(2024). Reading science, MTSS, and data: How to make 3 initiatives only 1 thing [Webinar]. edWeb. https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20240402edwebnet15

Ennis

R. P.

Royer

D. J.

Lane

K. L.

Menzies

H. M.

Oakes

W. P.

Schellman

L. E.

(2018). Behavior-specific praise: An effective, efficient, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618798587

10.

Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. No. 114-95 (2015).

11.

Frazelle

Barry

E.-R.

(2024). Today’s MTSS classroom: Meeting the instructional needs of ALL students [Webinar]. edWeb. https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20240417edwebnet20

12.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2017). Critique of the national evaluation of response to intervention: A case for simpler frameworks. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 255-268. 10.1177/0014402917693580

13.

Fuchs

L. S.

Vaughn

(2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important? TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522966

14.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Malone

A. S.

(2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917703962

15.

Fuxman

Goff

(2024). MTSS success: “Light Lift” solutions & strategies to improve behavior & mental health [Webinar]. https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20240118edweb65

16.

Greenfield

Rinaldi

Proctor

C. P.

Cardarelli

(2010). Teachers’ perceptions of a response to intervention (RTI) reform effort in an urban elementary school: A consensual qualitative analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207310365499

17.

Harlacher

J. E.

Siler

C. E.

(2011). Factors related to successful RTI implementation. Communique, 39(6), 20–22.

18.

Hosp

J. L.

(n.d.). Response to intervention and the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in education. RTI Action Network, National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/diversity/disproportionaterepresentation

19.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §1401 et seq. (2004).

20.

The IRIS Center. (2006). RTI (part 1): An overview [Online module]. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/rti01/#content

21.

The IRIS Center. (2017). High-quality mathematics instruction: What teachers should know [Online module]. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/math.

22.

Johnson

S. M.

Reinhorn

Charner-Laird

Kraft

Papay

J. P.

(2014). Ready to lead, but how? Teachers’ experiences in high-poverty urban schools. Teachers College Record, 116(10), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177.016146811411601005

23.

Kennedy

M. J.

Aceves

T. C.

(2024). Background basics & HLPs 2.0. In Aceves

T. C.

Kennedy

M. J.

(Eds.). High-leverage practices for students with disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 7–13). Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.

24.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Cantwell

E. D.

Royer

D. J.

(2016). Building and installing comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T) models of prevention: A practical guide to supporting school success (1st ed.). Apple.

25.

Langreo

(2023, March 8). 5 essential ingredients for effective tutoring. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/5-essential-ingredients-for-effective-tutoring/2023/03

26.

Loeb

(2022). High-impact tutoring: An equitable, proven approach to accelerate learning [Webinar]. edWeb. https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20220110edweb84

27.

Martin

Sargent

Van Camp

Wright

(2018). Practice guide: Increasing opportunities to respond as an intensive intervention. US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.

28.

Morse

T. E.

(2020). Response to intervention: Refining instruction to meet student needs. Rowman & Littlefield.

29.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110 (2001).

30.

Potter

(2023). What to do when students don’t respond to interventions. Center on Multi-Tiered System of Supports. https://mtss4success.org/blog/students-dont-respond-interventions

31.

Ryan

(2024, January 31). Brilliance in the building: Effecting change in urban schools [Webinar]. edWeb. https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20240131edweb54

32.

Shapiro

E. S.

(n.d.). Tiered instruction and intervention in a response to intervention model. RTI Action Network, National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredinstruction/tiered-instruction-and-intervention-rti-model

33.

Sparks

S. D.

(2015, November 6). Study: RTI practice falls short of promise. Education Week. edweek.org/teaching-learning/study-rti-practice-falls-short-of-promise/2015/11

34.

Stewart

R. M.

Benner

G. J.

Martella

R. C.

Marchand-Martella

R. C.

(2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090040601

35.

Stewart

R. M.

Martella

R. C.

Marchand-Martella

N. E.

Benner

G. J.

(2005). Three-tier models of reading and behavior. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 2(3), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100308

36.

Vaughn

Zumeta

(2014). So what do I do now? Strategies for intensifying intervention when standard approaches don’t work? [Webinar]. https://intensiveintervention.org/resource/so-what-do-i-do-now-strategies-intensifying-intervention-when-standard-approaches-dont

37.

Walton

(2024). Performance declines in basic mathematics and reading skills since the COVID-19 pandemic are evident across many racial/ethnic groups. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/blog/pandemic_performance_declines_across_racial_and_ethnic_groups.aspx

38.

Whitney

Cooper

J. T.

Lingo

A. S.

(2017). Increasing student engagement through opportunities to respond. Kentucky Teacher Education Journal: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Kentucky Council for Exceptional Children, 3(2), 3. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ktej/vol3/iss2/3

39.

Yell

M. L.

(2016). The law and special education. (4th ed.). Pearson.

40.

Yell

M. L.

Walker

D. W.

(2010). Response to intervention: The legal basis and current litigation. Exceptionality, 18(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2010.491741