The promise of the charter public school model offers flexibility and autonomy for leaders to enable them to experiment and innovate when running their school. This study examined the leadership of four Boston charter public high schools with predominantly Black and Hispanic, low-income populations that have shown progress narrowing the achievement gap. In-depth semistructured interviews explored the leadership’s success to improve student outcomes compared with the sending district and the state. Findings suggest that leadership is instrumental to the success of each charter public school in this study. Many common characteristics emerge among all four schools, however, the distinctiveness and success of each school is the result of leadership’s ability to orchestrate the characteristics and decisions that culminate to create each educational community. Three dimensions particularly emerged as essential to each school’s success according to leadership: (a) high expectations for student outcome as measured by college completion; (b) safe and orderly learning environment; and (c) an all-school adherence to leadership’s vision in the context of the school’s mission. Each dimension is interpreted and implemented differently depending on the school mission and the leader’s particular vision, experience, and personality resulting in distinct organizational cultures at each school.
ColemanJ. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education/National Center for Education Statistics.
EllisS.GaudetR.HooverM.KaufmanM.MaderM. (2004, October). A study of MCAS achievement and promising practices in urban special education: Summary of field research findings: A cross-case analysis of promising practices in selected Massachusetts urban public schools. Hadley: University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute. Retrieved from http://www.donahue.umassp.edu/docs/exec_summary_field_rsrch_findings
24.
EppsE. (1992). Education of African Americans. In AlkinM. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 49-60). New York, NY: MacMillan.
25.
FergusonR. (2006). New evidence on why Black high schoolers get accused of “acting White.” Unpublished manuscript, Wiener Center for Social Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
26.
FergusonR. (2008). Toward excellence with equity: An emerging vision for closing the achievement gap. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
FinnC. (1997). Charter school accountability: Findings and prospects. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Education Foundation.
28.
FinnC. (2001). Charter schools in action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
FullertonJ.KaneT. (2009). Informing the debate comparing Boston’s charter, pilot and traditional schools. Boston, MA: The Boston Foundation.
30.
GlennC. (1994). School distinctiveness. Journal of Education, 176, 73-103.
31.
GlennC. (2006). The wrong debate. Education week, 26(13), 31-32.
32.
HallD.SchoutenF. (2004). Stalled in secondary: A look at student achievement since the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
33.
HoxbyC. (2001). Rising tide: New evidence on competition and the public schools. Education Next, 1, 4.
34.
HoxbyC. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence from the United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 11-68.
35.
HoxbyC. (2004). Achievement in charter schools and regular public schools in the United States: Understanding the differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
HoxbyC.RockoffJ. (2004). The impact of charter schools on student achievement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Economics.
37.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (1998). The Black–White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38.
LairdJ.DebellM.ChapmanC. (2006). Dropout rates in the United States: 2004 (NCES 2007-024). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007024.pdf
39.
LeeJ. (2006). Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps: An in-depth look into national and state reading and math outcome trends. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, The Civil Rights Project.
40.
MarzanoR. (2003). What works in schools—Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
41.
Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts Charter School Achievement Comparison Study: An analysis of 2001-2005 MCAS performance. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/infoservices/reports/gradrates/
42.
Massachusetts Department of Education. (2007, November). Massachusetts Department of Education students with disabilities annual report: 2006-2007. Malden: Author. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/research/reports/1107sped.pdf
43.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2001). MCAS Results 2001. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/results.html
44.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2002). MCAS Results 2002. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/results.html
45.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2003). MCAS Results 2003. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/results.html
46.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2004). MCAS Results 2004. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/results.html
47.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2005). MCAS Results 2005. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/results.html
48.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2006a). MCAS Results 2006. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/results.html
49.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2006b). Massachusetts Department of Education Charter School Reports [CPS #1 site visit report]. Retrieved from www.doemass.org/charter/reports/default.html
50.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2006c). Massachusetts Department of Education Charter School Reports [CPS #2 site visit report]. Retrieved from www.doemass.org/charter/reports/default.html
51.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2006d). Massachusetts Department of Education Charter School Reports [CPS #3 site visit report]. Retrieved from www.doemass.org/charter/reports/default.html
52.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2006e). Massachusetts Department of Education Charter School Reports [CPS #4 site visit report]. Retrieved from www.doemass.org/charter/reports/default.html
NelsonH. (2004). Charter school achievement on the 2003 National Assessment of Education Progress. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teaches.
60.
OgbuJ. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
OrfieldG.LosenD.WaldJ.SwansonC. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University (Advocates for Children of New York, The Civil Society Institute [Contributors]).
62.
RothsteinR. (2004). Class and school: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black–White achievement gap. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
63.
RutterM.MaughanB.MortimoreP.OustonJ. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
SammonsP.HillmanJ.MortimoreP. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London, UK: International School Effectiveness and Improvement Center Institute of Education, University of London.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (NCES 2001-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004, January). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Reading Assessment. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/
72.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Academic outcomes: Student reading and mathematics performance in public school by urbanicity (The Condition of Education, Indicator 14). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/
73.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006 Indicator 5: Racial/ethnic distribution of public school students (NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
74.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2006). Charter high schools: Closing the achievement gap, innovations in education. Washington, DC: Author.
