The focus on school-level performance brought about by the No Child Left Behind Act—as well as recent court cases challenging the use of race in student assignment polices—has brought greater attention to the need to for careful study of the allocation of resources within school districts. This paper describes the policy context, review key intradistrict studies, and proffers three extensions to the field of intradistrict resource analysis: consideration of teacher labor markets, consideration of the resource implications of peer effects, and the use of additional statistical methods such as quantile regression. Taken together, these topics have the promise to extend the field of intradsitrict resource allocation.
Anderson, J.D. ( 1988). The education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935 . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2.
Austin, P.C., & Schull, M.J. ( 2003). Quantile regression: A statistical tool for out-of-hospital research. Academic Emergency Medicine, 10, 789-797.
3.
Ballou, D. & Podgursky, M. ( 2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence? Teachers College Record, 102(1), 5-27.
4.
Bayer, P.J., Ferreira, F.V., & McMillan, R. ( 2004). Tiebout sorting, social multipliers and the demand for school quality (NBER Working Paper No. W10871). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=612073
5.
Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. ( 1984). The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological, and empirical dimensions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. ( 1994). Measuring equity at the school level: The finance perspective . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 16, 405-415.
7.
Board of Education v. Superior Court (Carlin) (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 411.
8.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2003). Understanding teacher labor markets: Implications for equity. New York, NY: Education Finance Research Consortium.
9.
Burke, S.M. ( 1999). An analysis of resource inequality at the state, district and school levels. Journal of Education Finance, 24, 435-458.
10.
Busch, C., & Odden, A. ( 1997). Introduction to the special issue: Improving educational policy and results with school-level data-A synthesis of multiple perspectives . Journal of Education Finance, 22, 225-245.
11.
Cade, B.S., & Noon, B.R. ( 2003). A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists . Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 412-420.
12.
Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 57 Supp. 2d 228 (1999).
Chubb, J.E., & Moe, T.M. ( 1991). Politics, Markets and America’s Schools . New York: Brookings.
15.
Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vidor, J. ( 2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377-392.
16.
Condron, D.J., & Roscigno, V.J. (2003). Disparities within: Unequal spending and achievement in an urban school district. Sociology of Education, 76, 18-36.
17.
Eide, E., & Showalter, M.H. (1998). The effect of school quality on student performance: A quantile regression approach. Economic Letters, 58, 345-350.
18.
Freeman, C., Scafidi, B., & Sjoquist, D.L. (2002, August 30). Racial segregation in Georgia public schools, 1994-2001: Trends, causes and impact on teacher quality. Paper presented at Resegregation of Southern schools? A crucial moment in the history (and the future) of public schooling in America. Chapel Hill, NC.
19.
Fusarelli, L.D. ( 2004). The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18, 71-94.
20.
Galvin, P. ( 2000). Organizational boundaries, authority and school district organization. In N. Theobald & B. Malen (Eds.), Balancing local control and state responsibility for K-12 education, The 2000 Yearbook of the American Education Finance Association (pp. 279-310). Larchmont, NY : Eye on Education.
21.
Goertz, M., & Duffy, M. ( 2003). Mapping the landscape of high-stakes testing and accountability programs. Theory Into Practice, 42, 4-11.
22.
Goldring, E.G., Cohen-Vogel, L., Smrekar, C., & Taylor, C. ( 2006). Schooling closer to home: Desegregation policy and neighborhood contexts. American Journal of Education,112, 335-362.
23.
Goldring, E.B., & Houck, E.A. ( 2005, April 14). Teacher resources and mobility under unitary status. Presentation at the American Education Research Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
24.
Goldring, E.B., & Smrekar, C. ( 2002, August 30). Shifting from court-ordered to court-ended desegregation in Nashville: Student assignment and teacher resources. Paper presented at Resegregation of Southern schools? A crucial moment in the history (and the future) of public schooling in America. Chapel Hill, NC.
Hanushek, E.A. ( 1981). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance . Educational Researcher, 18, 45-62.
27.
Hanushek, E.A. ( 1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
28.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. ( 1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? ( National Bureau of Economic Research working paper #7082). Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7082
29.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. ( 2001a). Why public schools lose teachers ( National Bureau of Economic Research working paper #8599). Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8599
30.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. ( 2001b, January) How much does school integration affect student achievement? Unpublished manuscript presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, New Orleans, LA.
31.
Hanushek, E.A.Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. ( 2002). New Evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The Complex Effects of School Racial Composition on Achievement. tests . Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved August 7, 2010, from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/nbrnberwo/8741.htm .
32.
Hedges, L.V., Laine, R.D., & Greenwald, R. ( 1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
33.
Hertert, L. ( 1995). Does equal funding for districts mean equal funding for classroom students? Evidence from California. In L. Picus & J. Wattenbarger (Eds.), Where does the money go? Resource allocation in elementary and secondary schools (pp. 71-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34.
Honig, M.I. ( 2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators’ roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 292-338.
35.
Houck, E.A. ( 2010). Teacher quality and school resegregation: A resource allocation case study. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1): 49-77.
36.
Hoxby, C. ( 2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
Iatarola, P., & Stiefel, L. ( 2003). Intradistrict equity of public education resources and performance. Economics of Education Review, 22, 69-78.
38.
Ingersoll, R.M. ( 2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
39.
Kelly v. Metropolitan Board of Education (1998). 139 F. Supp. 578 (M.D. Tenn 1956).
40.
Keyes v. Denver School District No. I, 902 F. Supp. 1274 (1995).
41.
Koenker, R. ( 2005). Quantile regression. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
42.
Koenker, R., & Basset, G. ( 1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica , 46, 33-50.
43.
Laine, R.D., Greenwald, R., & Hedges, L.V. ( 1996). Money does matter: A research synthesis of a new universe of education production function studies. In L. Picus & J. Wattenbarger (Eds.), Where does the money go? (pp. 44-70).Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
44.
Lambert, P.J., & Aronson, J.R. ( 1993). Inequality decomposition analysis and the Gini coefficient revisited. Economic Journal, 103, 1221-1227.
45.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37-62.
46.
Latarola, P., & Stiefel, L. ( 2003). Intradistrict equity of public education resources and performance. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 69-78.
47.
Lee, V.E., & Bryk, A.S. ( 1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.
48.
Levin, J. ( 2001). For whom the reductions count: A quantile regression analysis of class size and peer effects on scholastic achievement. Empirical Economics, 26, 221-246.
49.
Loeb, S., & Page, M.E. ( 2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 393-408.
50.
Mills v. Freeman, 942 F. Supp. 1449, 1464 (NDGa. 1996)
51.
Odden, A.R., Picus, L.O.,( 2003). School Finance: A Policy Perspective (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
Orfield, G. ( 2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation . Civil Rights Project. Available from http://www.law.harvard.edu/groups/civilrights/publications/resegregation01/schoolsseparate.pdf
53.
Orfield, G., & Eaton, S. ( 1999). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown V. Board of Education. New York, NY: New Press.
54.
Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E.D., & Lee, C. ( 2003). The resurgence of school segregation. Educational Leadership, 60, 16-20.
55.
Owens, T., & Maiden, J. ( 1999). A comparison of interschool and interdistrict funding equity in Florida. Journal of Education Finance, 24, 503-518.
56.
Roza, M. ( 2005). Strengthening Title I to help high poverty schools . Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington, DC: United States.
57.
Roza, M., & Evans, D.J. ( 2005, February 22-27). Many a slip between cup and lip: District fiscal practices and their effect on school spending. Seattle, WA: Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs .
58.
Roza, M., & Hill, P.T. ( 2004). How within-district spending inequities help some schools to fail. Brookings Papers on Education Policy. Seattle, WA: Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs .
59.
Roza, M., Miller, L., & Hill, P. ( 2005, August 18). Strengthening Title I to help high-poverty schools: How Title I funds fit into district allocation patterns. Working paper, Center on Reinventing Public Education. Seattle, WA: Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs .
60.
Rubenstein, R. ( 1998). Resource equity in the Chicago Public Schools: A school-level approach. Journal of Education Finance, 23, 468-489.
61.
Schoenfeld, A.H. ( 2006). What Doesn’t Work: The Challenge and Failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to Conduct Meaningful Reviews of Studies of Mathematics Curricula. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 13-21.
62.
Schröder, H.K., Andersen, H.E., & Kiehl, K. ( 2005). Rejecting the mean: Estimating the response of fen plant species to environmental factors by non-linear quantile regression . Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 373-382.
63.
Schwartz, A.E., Steifel, L., & Amor, H.B. ( 2005). Measuring school performance using cost functions . In Stiefel, L., Schwartz, A.E., and Rubenstein, R. (Eds.), Measuring school performance and efficiency: Implications for practice and research-2005 Yearbook of the American Education Finance Association (pp. 67-92). New York, NY: Eye on Education.
64.
Serrano v. Priest (1971). 5 Cal.3d 584.
65.
Spillane, J.P. ( 1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10, 63-87.
66.
Spillane, J.P. ( 1998). State Policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations . American Educational Research Journal, 35, 33-63.
67.
Stiefel, L., Rubenstein, R., & Berne, R. ( 1998). Intra-district equity in four large cities: Data, methods and results. Journal of Education Finance, 23, 447-467.
68.
Stiefel, L., Rubenstein, R., & Schwartz, A. ( 2004). From districts to schools: The distribution of resources across schools in big city school districts. New York, NY: Education Finance Research Consortium .
69.
Summers, A.A., & Wolfe, B.L. ( 1976). Intradistrict distribution of school inputs to the disadvantaged: Evidence for the courts. Journal of Human Resources, 11, 328-342.
70.
Tiebout, C. ( 1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 65, 416-424.
71.
WakeCares v. Wake County Board of Education, NCSup 07-CVS-04020 (2007).
72.
Walker, V.S. ( 1996). Their highest potential: An African American school community in the segregated South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
73.
Walberg, H.J., & Walberg, H. ( 1994). Losing local control. Educational Researcher , 23, 19-26.
74.
Wells, A.S., & Crain, R.L. ( 1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64531-555.
75.
Wells, A.S., & Frankenberg, E. (2007). The Public Schools and the Challenge of the Supreme Court’s Integration Decision. The Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 178-188.
