This article examines support for school bonds among minority group members in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, which includes the city of Charlotte. Asurveywas conducted shortly after a bitter court case and shortly before a proposed bond referendum. Support for bonds in the minority community was fairly moderate. Support was not related to self-interest. Rather, support for bonds was most closely associated with confidence in public officials.
Aberbach, J. D., & Walker, J. L. (1970). The attitudes of Blacks and Whites toward city services: Implications for public policy. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), Financing the metropolis: Public policy in urban economics (pp. 172-189). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Beck, P. A., & Dye, T.R. (1982). Sources of public opinion on taxes: The Florida case. Journal of Politics, 44, 172-182.
3.
Beck, P. A., Rainey, H. G., Nicholls, K., & Traut, C. (1987). Citizen views of taxes and services: A tale of three cities. Social Science Quarterly, 68, 223-243.
4.
Brodsky, D. M., & Thompson, E., III. (1993). Ethos, public choice, and referendum voting. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 286-299.
5.
Brokaw, A. J., Gale, J. R., & Merz, T. E. (1990). Explaining voter behavior toward local school expenditures: The impact of public attitudes. Economics of Education Review, 9, 67-72.
6.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
7.
Button, J. W. (1992). A sign of generational conflict: The impact of Florida’s aging voters on local school and tax referenda. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 787-797.
8.
Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 97-CV-482-P, 3:65-CV-1974-P (WDNC, September, 1999).
9.
Cenziper, D. (1997, September 6). Magnet admissions challenged. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1A-1A, 15A-15A.
10.
Cenziper, D. (1999, May 19). Witness: Schools still not balanced. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1C-1C, 7C-7C.
11.
Cenziper, D., & Griffin, A. (1997, November 5). Bonds OK’d by big margins. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1A-1A, 11A-11A.
12.
Chew, K. S. Y. (1992). The demographic erosion of political support for public education: Asuburban case study. Sociology of Education, 65, 280-292.
13.
City Publishing Company (2000). Cross reference directory: Greater Charlotte. Independence, Kansas: City Publishing.
14.
Fitzgerald, M. R., & Durant, R. F. (1980). Citizen evaluations and urban management: Service delivery in an era of protest. Public Administration Review, 40, 585-594.
15.
Goldring, E., & Smrekar, C. (2000). Magnet schools and the pursuit of racial balance. Education and Urban Society, 33, 17-35.
16.
Harris, M., Jackson, N., & Rydingsword, C. (1975). The integration of American schools. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Mecklenburg County Board of Elections (1999). 1999 Voting Precincts: Mecklenburg County, NC. Mecklenburg County, NC: Mecklenburg County Geographic Information Systems.
18.
Morrill, J. (1999, April 23). 30-year-old ruling still echoes in court today. The Charlotte Observer, p. 4C-4C.
19.
Muir, E., & Schneider, K. (1999). State initiatives and referenda on bonds: Acomparative analysis of one solution for the school infrastructure crisis. Journal of Educational Finance, 24, 415-434.
20.
Olsen, M. E. (1965). Alienation and political opinions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 200-212.
21.
Piele, P. K, & Hall, J. S. (1973). Budgets, bonds, and ballots: Voting behavior in school finance elections. Lexington, MA: Heath.
22.
Pilla, J. (2000a, March 21). Board official questions school funding delay. The Charlotte Observer, p. 3B-3B.
23.
Pilla, J. (2000b, April 3). School bond referendum up for vote. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1B-1B, 4B-4B.
24.
Reed, D. S. (2001). Not in my schoolyard: Localism and public opposition to funding schools equally. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 34-50.
25.
Rothacker, J. W., & Helms, A. D. (1999, December 31). Schools get time to plan. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1A-1A, 4A-4A.
26.
Rothacker, J. W., & Smith, C. (1999, December 8). Reject assignment plan, coalition urges. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1C-1C, 5C-5C.
27.
Sanders, A. (1988). Rationality, self-interest, and public attitudes on public spending. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 311-324.
28.
Sears, D., & Citrin, J. (1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Sears, D., Hensler, C. P., & Speer, L. K. (1979). Whites’ opposition to busing: Self-interest or symbolic politics. American Political Science Review, 73, 369-384.
30.
Shabman, L., & Stephenson, K. (1994). Acritique of the self-interested voter model: The case of a local single issue referendum. Journal of Economic Issues, 28, 1173-1186.
31.
Smith, C. (1999a, April 23). Witnesses at trial place blame on busing for disruption, tensions, falling grades. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1C-1C, 4C-4C.
32.
Smith, C. (1999b, May 21). Witness faults racial-balance choices. The Charlotte Observer, pp. 1C-1C, 8C-8C.
33.
Smith, C., & Cenziper, D. (1999, September 11). Judge to schools: No racial assignment. The Charlotte Observer, p. 1A-1A, 19A-19A.
34.
Smith, C., & Rothacker, J. W. (2000, November 8). Mecklenburg OK’s school bonds. The Charlotte Observer, p. 15A-15A.
35.
Smith, T. W. (1982). Public support for educational spending: Trends, rankings, and models, 1971-1978. In K. J. Gilmartin & R. J. Rossi (Eds.), Monitoring educational outcomes and public attitudes (pp. 164-198). New York: Human Sciences.
36.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 404 U.S. 811 (1971).
37.
Tedin, K. L. (1994). Self-interest, symbolic values, and the financial equalization of the public schools. Journal of Politics, 56, 628-649.
38.
Wainscott, S. H., & Woodard, J. D. (1986). School finance and school desegregation: Ten-year effects in southern school districts. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 587-595.
