The U.S. District of Columbia’s Federal Circuit Court decision in Hobson v. Hanson (1967) case eliminated racial discriminatory tracking practices in the nation’s capitol’s public schools. The court ruled that D.C. Public Schools’ tracking violated African American and low income students’ rights to equal opportunities to education under the equal protection and due process clauses of the 14th Amendment. While D.C. Public Schools eradicated school tracking, it continued in other urban schools. This article examines the Federal Court’s role in the perpetuation of school tracking practices and challenges minority students’ access to equal educational opportunities in schools with tracked classrooms. It also addresses the need for equitable schools to provide all students with the opportunity to learn.
Adams, J.Q., & Ternasky, L. ( 1998). Educational equity audit and climate report for the Urbana School District. Urbana: Illinois Staff and Curriculum Developers Association.
2.
Allport, G. ( 1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
3.
Artiles, A.J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J.J., & Higared, I. ( 2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71, 283-300.
4.
Bell, D. ( 1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism . New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
Blanchett, W.J., Mumford, V., & Beachum, F. ( 2005). Urban school failure and disproportionality in a post-Brown era: Benign neglect of the constitutional rights of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 70-81.
6.
Blanchett, W.J. ( 2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of White privilege and racism . Educational Researcher, 35, 24-28.
7.
Boykin, A.W. ( 1983). The academic performance of Afro-American children. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 321-371). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.
8.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
9.
Brown, R. ( 1995). Prejudice: It’s social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
Clark, K.B., & Clark, M.P. ( 1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children . In T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley, (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (pp. 169-178). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
11.
Committee on Education and Labor. (1967). Bilingual Education Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12.
Committee on Education and Labor. (1974). Bilingual Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. ( 1989). Stigma and self-esteem: The protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
14.
Eaton, S. ( 1994). Slipping toward segregation: Local control and eroding desegregation in Montgomery County, Maryland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
15.
Ferri, B.A., & Connor, D.J. ( 2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re) segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107, 453-474.
16.
Fierros, E.G., & Conroy, J.W. ( 2002). Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. In D. J. Losen & G. Orfield (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 39-70). Cambridge, MA : Harvard Education Press.
17.
Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP v. State of Georgia, 775 F. 2d 1403 (11th Cir.1985).
18.
Hakuta, K., Butler, Y.G., & Witt, D. ( 2000/2001). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency. Santa Barbara: Linguistic Minority Research Institute, University of California.
19.
Hallinan, M. ( 1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67, 79-84.
20.
Harris, C. ( 1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review , 106, 1709-1791.
21.
Harris, C. ( 2002). Critical race studies: An introduction. UCLA Law Review, 49, 1215-1240.
22.
Harry, B., & Klingner, J. ( 2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
23.
Harry, B., Klingner, J., & Cramer, E. ( 2007). Case studies of minority student placement in special education. New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
24.
Heller, K.A., Holtzman, W.H., & Messick, S. ( 1982). Introduction: Disproportion in special education. In K. A. Heller, W. H. Holtzman, & S. Messick (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 3-22). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
Henig, J. ( 1990). Choice in public schools: An analysis of transfer requests among magnet. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 69-82.
26.
Henig, J. ( 1995). Race and choice in Montgomery County, Maryland, magnet schools. Teachers College Record, 96, 729-734.
27.
Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 (D. D.C. 1967).
28.
Johnson v. Board of Education Champaign Unit School District 4, 188 F. Supp. 944 (C.D.Ill. 2002).
29.
Keyes v. School District 1, 413 U.S. 189 (1973).
30.
Keyes v. School District 1, 380 F. Supp. 673 (D. Colo., 1974).
31.
Kugelmass, J.W. ( 1987). Behavior, bias, and handicaps: Labeling the emotionally disturbed child. Oxford: Transaction Books.
32.
Ladson-Billings, G. ( 1998). Just what is critical race theory and what is it doing in a nice field like education? Qualitative Studies in Education , 11, 7-24.
33.
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W.F. ( 2006). Toward a critical race theory of education. In A. Dixson & C. K. Rousseau (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song (pp. 11-30). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Larry P. v. Wilson Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. C.A., 1972).
35.
Lau v. Nichols,414 U.S. 563 (1974).
36.
Lopez, M. ( 1978). Bilingual education and the Latino student. In L. A. Valverde (Ed.), Bilingual education for Latinos (pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
37.
Loveless, T. ( 1999). The tracking wars: State reform meets school policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38.
Lucas, S.R. ( 1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
Mickelson, R. ( 2003). When are racial disparities in education the result of racial discrimination?: A social science perspective. Teachers College Record, 105 (6), 1052-1086.
40.
Mitchell, R.E., & Mitchell, D.E. (2005). Student segregation and tracking in year-round schools. Teachers College Record, 107, 529-562.
41.
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS). ( 2005). Annual report on our call to action: Montgomery County Public Schools. Rockville, IN: Department of Communications for the Department of Shared Accountability.
42.
Neal, L.I., McCray, A.D., Webb-Johnson, G., & Bridgest, S.T. (2003). The effects of African American movement styles on teachers’ perceptions and reactions. Journal of Special Education, 37, 49-58.
43.
Noguera, P. ( 1995). Educational rights and Latinos: Tracking as a form of second generation discrimination. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal , 8, 25-41.
44.
Noguera, P. ( 2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45.
Oakes, J. ( 1995). More than meets the eye: Links between tracking and the culture of schools. In H. Pool & J. A. Page (Eds.), Beyond tracking: Finding success in inclusive schools (pp. 59-70). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
46.
Oakes, J. ( 2005). Keeping on track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2004 ). Twenty-sixth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
48.
Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 640 F.2d 782 (6th Cir. 1980).
49.
Oswald, D.P., Coutinho M.J., & Best, A.L. ( 2002). Community and school predictors of over representation of minority children in special education. In D. J. Losen & G. Orfield, (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, MA : Cambridge Harvard Education Press.
50.
Patton, J.M. ( 1998). The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: Looking behind the curtain for understanding and solutions . Journal of Special Education, 32, 25-31.
51.
People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, 851 F. Supp. 905 (N.D. Ill.1993).
52.
Peterkin, R., & Lucey, J. ( 1998). Educational equity audit: Findings and recommendations . Champaign, IL: Champaign County Schools Unit #4.
53.
Planty, M., Provasnik, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Hampden-Thompson, G., Dinkes, R., & Kridl. ( 2007). The condition of education 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
54.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
55.
Reid, D.K., & Knight, M.G. ( 2006). Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in disability studies. Educational Researcher, 35, 18-23.
56.
Rist, R. ( 1973). The urban school: A factory for failure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
Rist, R. ( 2007). On understanding the process of schooling: The contributions of labeling theory. In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Sociology of Education: A critical reader (pp. 71-82). New York, NY : Routledge.
58.
Romo, H.D., & Falbo, T. ( 1996). Latino high school graduation: Defying the odds. Austin: University of Texas.
59.
Skiba, R. ( 2001). When is disproportionality discrimination? The overrepresentation of Black students in school suspension. In W. Ayers, B. Dohrn, & R. Ayers (Eds.), Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools. New York: The New Press.
60.
Teresa P. v. Berkeley Unified School District, 724 F. Supp. 698 (N.D. Cal. 1989).
61.
Tropea, J.L. ( 1987). Bureaucratic order and special children: Urban schools, 1890s-1940s. History of Education Quarterly, 27, 29-53.
62.
Welner, K.G. ( 2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
63.
Westminster School Dist. of Orange County v. Mendez, 161 F.2d 774, 782 (9th Cir. 1947).
64.
Wheelock, A. ( 1992). Crossing the tracks: How untracking can save America’s schools. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
65.
Williams v. State of California, Superior Court of California, San Francisco No. 312236 (2000).
66.
Williams-Shealey, M., & Scott Lue, M. ( 2006). Why are all the Black kids still in special education? Revisiting the issue of disproportionate representation. Multicultural Perspectives, 8, 3-9.
