Students in central-city schools face many hardships and problems when compared to their suburban counterparts. To a large extent these problems and hardships prevent students in central-city schools from achieving their fullest potential. Students in central-city schools also typically score lower than students in other school locations on national assessments. This study used data from several National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reports to compare achievement of students in central-city schools, rural schools, and suburban schools in many content areas and in different years. Such comparisons led to the identification of the “Significantly Worse Phenomenon.”
Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. (1995). Problems of urban America: Hearings before the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, January 25 and March 12, 1991. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
Hummel, R. C., & Nagle, J. M. (1973). Urban education in America: Problems and prospects. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Crown.
4.
Lippman, L., Burns, S., & McArthur, E. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 96-184).
5.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
6.
Ornstein, A. C. (1972). Urban education: Student unrest, teacher behaviors, and Black power. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
7.
Passow, A. H. (Ed.). (1971). Urban education in the 1970’s: Reflections and a look ahead. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Recruiting New Teachers, Inc., et al. (2000). The urban teacher challenge: Teacher demand and supply in the great city schools. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
9.
Tharpe, D. I. (1997). The unique problems of inner city and urban districts: School business officials voice their concerns. School Business Affairs, 63 (4), 29-36.
10.
Thirunarayanan, M. O. (2002). The “significantly worse” phenomenon: A study of student achievement in different content areas by school location. Miami, FL: Florida International University, College of Education, Center for Urban Education and Innovation.
11.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. (1992). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
12.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. (1994). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
13.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. (1996). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
14.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. (1998). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
15.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
16.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
