The “achievement gap” between African American and Latino students and those of their White counterparts continues to evoke national cries of consternation and condemnation of the public schools, particularly those in urban areas. This article posits that the achievement gap will never be resolved because it is an artifact of the process of measurement in which flawed tests have been used to assess pupil progress. In particular, IQ and its derivative achievement tests cousins have always shown that socioeconomic status (SES) is a crucial variable in explaining test score variance. SES is part of the concept of cultural capital, and this form of capital is a potent predictor of student success.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowles, S.
, & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Carnoy, M.
(1999). Globalization and educational reform: What planners need to know. Paris, France: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
3.
Davenport, C.
(1911). Heredity in relation to eugenics. New York: Henry Holt.
4.
English, F.
(1991). Visual traces in schools and the reproduction of social inequities. In K. Borman, P. Swami, & L. Wagstaff (Eds.), Contemporary issues in U.S. education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
English, F.
, Frase, L., Melton, R., Steffy, B., Downey, C., Kaplan, M., Poston, W., & Wilkerson, D. (1999, February). A curriculum management audit ofthe Waterloo Community Schools, Waterloo, Iowa. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
6.
English, F.
, & Steffy, B. (2001). Deep curriculum alignment: Creating a level playing field for all children on high-stakes tests ofeducational accountability. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Educational Press.
7.
Fine, B.
(1975). The stranglehold ofthe IQ. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
8.
Foucault, M.
(1972). The archaeology ofknowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.
9.
Gardner, H.
(1983). Frames ofmind: The theory ofmultiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Giroux, H.
(1981). Ideology, culture and the process ofschooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
11.
Giroux, H.
(1994, October). The challenge of cultural studies to colleges of education. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(4), 464-469.
12.
Goddard, H.
(1917). Mental tests and the immigrant. Journal of Delinquency, 2, 243-277.
13.
Gould, S.
(1981). The mismeasure ofman. New York: Norton.
14.
Hernstein, R.
, & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
15.
Jencks, C.
, & Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16.
Jensen, A.
(1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
17.
Kincheloe, J.
(1999). How do we tell the workers? The socioeconomic foundations of work and vocational education. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Lenhardt, G.
, Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Education Research Journal, 18(3), 343-361.
19.
Macedo, D.
(1994). Literacies ofpower: What Americans are not allowed to know. Boulder, CO: Westview.
20.
Madaus, G.
, & Kellaghan, T. (1992). Curriculum evaluation and assessment. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook ofresearch on curriculum (pp. 119-156). New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
21.
Marks, R.
(1981). The idea of IQ. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
22.
McLaren, P.
(1989). Life in schools. New York: Longman.
23.
Moss-Mitchell, F. (1998, May). The effects of curriculum alignment on the mathematics achievement ofthird-grade students as measured by the Iowa Test of Basic Skills: Implica tions for educational administrators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Clark University.
24.
National Commission on Testing and Public Policy
. (1990). Reforming assessment: From gatekeepers to gateway to education. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
25.
Poston, W.
, Mitchell, J., Stevenson, Z., Kirland, C., Chernosky, C., Nichols, B., & Marx, G. (2000, September). A curriculum management audit ofmathematics education in the Mont gomery County Public Schools, Rockville, Maryland. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
26.
Robinson, G.
, & Brandon, D. (1994). NAEP test scores: Should they be used to compare and rank state educational quality?Reston, VA: Educational Research Service.
27.
Rose, M.
(2000). Darwin’s spectre: Evolutionary biology in the modern world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Sacks, P.
(1997, March/April). Standardized testing: Meritocracy’s crooked yardstick. Change, pp. 25-28.
29.
Sapon-Shevin, M.
(1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
30.
Steffy, B.
, English, F., McLendon, D., Profitt, E., Heard, D., Matrox-Hall, D., Perkins, H., & Wilkerson, D. (1999, September). A curriculum management audit ofthe Rockford Public Schools, Rockford, Illinois. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
31.
Sternberg, R.
(1992). Metaphors ofmind: Conceptions ofthe nature ofintelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Thorndike, R.
(1951). Community variables as predictors of intelligence and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 321-338.
33.
Usher, R.
, & Edwards, R. (1996). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.
34.
Wang, J.
(1998, Fall). Opportunity to learn: The impacts and policy implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(3), 137-156.
35.
Wilkins, J. (2000). Characteristics ofdemographic opportunity structures and their relationship to school-level achievement: The case of Virginia’s standards oflearning. Unpublished manuscript, American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LO.
36.
World Bank
. (1995). Strategies for education. Washington, DC: Author.
