CegelkaW. J., & TylerJ. L. (1970). The efficacy of special class placement for the mentally retarded in proper perspective. Training School Bulletin, 67(1), 33–67.
2.
CormanL., & GottliebJ. (1978). Mainstreaming mentally retarded children: A review of research. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 9, pp. 251–275). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Diana v. State Board of Education (1970). C-70-37 (RFP, District Court for Northern California).
4.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
5.
GerberM. M. (1984). The Department of Education's sixth annual report to Congress on PL 94-142: Is Congress getting the full story?Exceptional Children, 51, 209–224.
6.
GrossmanH. J. (1973, 1977). Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, Special Publication No. 2.
7.
GrossmanH. J. (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
8.
HeberR. (1959, 1961). A manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Monograph Supplement, American Journal of Mental Deficiency.
9.
KiddJ. W. (1984). The 1983 AAMD definition and classification of mental retardation: The apparent impact of the CEC-MR position. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 18, 243–244.
10.
Larry P. v. Riles (1972). C-71-2270 (RFP, District Court for Northern California).
11.
MacMillanD. L. (1982). Mental retardation in school and society (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
12.
MacMillanD. L., & BorthwickS. (1980). The new educable mentally retarded population: Can they be mainstreamed?Mental Retardation, 18, 155–158.
13.
MacMillanD. L., JonesR. L., & AloiaG. F. (1974). The mentally retarded label: A theoretical analysis and review of research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 241–261.
14.
MercerJ. R., & LewisJ. P. (1977). System of multicultural pluralistic assessment: Parent interview manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
15.
PollowayE. A. (1984). The integration of mildly retarded students in the schools: An historical review. Remedial and Special Education, 5(4), 18–28.
16.
PollowayE. A., & SmithJ. D. (1983). Changes in mild mental retardation: Population, programs, and perspectives. Exceptional Children, 50, 149–159.
17.
President's Committee on Mental Retardation (1970). The six-hour retarded child. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
ReschlyD. J. (1982). Assessing mild retardation: The influence of adaptive behavior, sociocultural status, and prospects for non-biased assessment. In ReynoldsC. R. & GutkinT. B. (Eds.), The handbook for school psychology (pp 209–242). New York: John Wiley.
19.
ReschlyD. J. (1981). Evaluation of the effects of SOMPA measures on classification of students as mildly mentally retarded. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 16–20.
20.
ReschlyD. J., & LamprechtM. J. (1979). Expectancy effects of labels: Fact or artifact?Exceptional Children, 46, 55–58.
21.
SargentL. R. (1981, Jan.). Assessment, documentation and programming for adaptive behavior: An Iowa task force report. Des Moines, IA: State of Iowa, Department of Instruction.
22.
SobseyD. (1984). Stigma and words of obscure origin. TASH Newsletter, 10(2), 1, 8.
23.
ZiglerE., & BallaD. (1981). Issues in personality and motivation in mentally retarded persons. In BegabM. J., HaywoodH. C., & GarberH. L. (Eds.), Psychosocial influences in retarded performance: Issues and theories of development (Vol. 1, pp. 197–218). Baltimore: University Park Press.
24.
ZiglerE., BallaD., & HodappR. (1984). On the definition and classification of mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 215–230.