This study investigated the perceptions of 345 Maine public school principals toward the effective mainstreaming within their schools of handicapped children according to type and level of handicapping condition. Compared with other handicapped pupils, mentally retarded students were generally viewed by principals as having the poorest prognosis for successful mainstreaming. Even mildly retarded pupils were seen as possessing relatively poor chances for successful integration within the regular classroom setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisW. E.Principals’ attitudes toward mainstreaming and related training needs. Orono, Maine: University of Maine Press, 1978.
2.
GearheartB. R., & WeishahnM. W.The handicapped child in the regular classroom. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1976.
3.
GrossmanH. J. (Ed.). Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1977.
4.
KaufmanM. J., GottliebJ., AgardJ. A., & KukicM. B.Mainstreaming: Toward an explication of the construct. In MeyenE. L., VergasonG. A., & WhelanR. J. (Eds.). Alternatives for teaching exceptional children, Denver: Love, 1975, pp. 35–54.
5.
MeyenE. L.Instructional planning for exceptional children in youth. In MeyenE. L. (Ed.). Exceptional children and youth. Denver: Love, 1978.
6.
PasanellaA. L., & VolkmorC. B.Coming back or never leaving: Instructional programming for handicapped students in the mainstream. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill, 1977.
7.
ReynoldsM. C., & BirchJ. W.Teaching exceptional children in all America's schools: A first course for teachers and principals. Reston, Virginia: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.
8.
Van OsdolW. R., & ShaneD. G.An introduction to exceptional children (2nd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1974.
9.
WiederholtJ. L., HammillD. D., & BrownV. B.The resource teacher: A guide to effective practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
