Results of a survey of parents who carried out sensorimotor patterning therapy programs in their homes are reported for 274 respondents (49 percent) among a reduced sample of 559 families. Findings included a low reported incidence of harmful effects on family relationships, low occurrence of promises that definite benefits would result, and overall beliefs that the programs were worth trying. However, parents could not cite specific functional changes in significant numbers. Problems in interpreting parents’ evaluation of change in their children and limitations in the generalizability of the results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Medical Association, Department of Mental Health. Form letter on the Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential (Philadelphia) for M. D.Chicago: American Medical Association, 1972.
2.
AttwellA. A., & ClabbyD. A.The retarded child: Answers to questions parents ask. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1971.
3.
BeckJ.Unlocking the secrets of the brain. Chicago Tribune Magazine, 1964 (reprinted from articles on Sept. 13 and 27, 1964).
4.
BirdJ.When children can't learn. Saturday Evening Post, 1967, 240, 72–74.
5.
CohenH. J., BirchH. G., & TaftL. T.Some considerations for evaluating the Doman-Delacato “patterning” method. Pediatrics, 1970, 45, 302–314.
6.
DelacatoC. H.Diagnosis and treatment of speech and reading problems. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1963.
7.
DelacatoC. H.Neurological organization and reading. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1966.
8.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.
9.
FreemanR. D.Controversy over “patterning” as a treatment for brain damage in children. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1967, 202, 385–388.
10.
GlassE. V., & RobbinsM. P.Neurological organization and reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 1967, 3, 7–52.
11.
LeWinnE. B., DomanG., DelacatoC. H., DomanR. J., SpitzE. B., & ThomasE. W.Neurological organization: The basis for learning. In HellmuthJ. (Ed.), Learning disorders. Vol. 2. Seattle: Child Publications, Inc.1966, 49–93.
12.
MaiselA. Q.Hope for brain-injured children. Reader's Digest, 1964, 85, 135–140.
13.
NeifertJ., & GaytonW.Parents and the home program approach in the remediation of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973, 6, 85–89.
14.
NemanR.A reply to Zigler and Seitz. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975, 79, 493–505.
15.
NemanR., RoosP., McCannB. M., MenolascinoF. J., & HealL. W.Experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning used with mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975, 79(4), 372–384.
16.
NemanR., RoosP., MenolascinoF. J., McCannB. M., & HealL. W.Final report: Sensori-motor training project. NARC, 1973.
17.
TaylorR. G.Jr. & NoldeS. V. L.Correlative study between reading laterality, mobility, and binocularity. Exceptional Children, 1969, 35, 627–631.
18.
WhitsellL. J.Delacato's “neurological organization”: A medical appraisal. California School Health, 1967 (fall issue), 1–11.
19.
ZiglerE., & SeitzV.On “an experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning”: A critique. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975, 79, 483–492.
