BradleyB. & HundziakM.TMI-Grolier time telling program for the mentally retarded.Exceptional Children, 1965, 32, 17–20.
3.
CampbellV. N.Adjusting self-instruction pro-grams to individual differences: Studies of cueing, responding and by-passing.American Institute for ResearchSan Mateo, Ca.AIR-C41-7/61-SR, 1961.
4.
CarrW. J.A functional analysis of self-instructional devices. In LumsdaineA. A. & GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book.Washington, D.C.:National Education Association, 1960.
5.
GreenE. J.The learning process and programmed instruction.New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1962.
6.
HaringN. G. & HaydenA. H.Workshop in instructional improvement: Behavior modification.University of WashingtonSupported through ESEA Title VI-A funds, Project No. 57-27-400-8-602, 1968.
7.
KlausmeierH. & LambertP.Teaching machines and the learning process.Educational Leader-ship, 1961, 13(4),278–283.
8.
LumsdaineA. A.Some theoretical and practical problems in programmed instruction. In De CeccoJ. P. (Ed.) Educational technology-readings in programmed instruction.New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1964.
9.
MooreJ. W., SmithW. I., & TeevanR. C.Motivational variables in programmed learning.Monograph. Final Report. USOE, Title VII, Grant No. 7-48-0070-149.1, 1965.
10.
PorterD.Teaching machines. In LumsdaineA. A. & GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book.Washington, D.C.:National Education Association, 1960.
11.
TrowW. C.Teacher and technology: New designs for learning.New York:Meredith Publishing Co., 1963.