This study contributes to our understanding of the origins and development of the human relationship with nature. The authors interviewed 120 participants (aged approximately 10 years, 5 months; 13 years, 6 months; 16 years, 7 months; and 19 years, 4 months) in Lisbon, Portugal, about environmental moral issues that involved water pollution, air pollution, forest fires, and logging. Results showed that participants conceived of polluting their localwaterway as a violation of a moral obligation. Participants’ justifications for these and other evaluations included both anthropocentric appeals (e.g., to personal interests, human welfare, and aesthetics) and biocentric appeals (e.g., that nature has intrinsic value or rights). Participants’ conceptions of living in harmony with nature showed a developmental trend. Finally, cross-cultural comparisons with studies conducted in the United States and the Brazilian Amazon support theproposition that therearesubstantial similarities in the environmental moral reasoning of young people across diverse cultures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brechin, S. R. (1999). Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 793-809.
2.
Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1994). Global environmentalism: A challenge to the post-materialism thesis? Social Science Quarterly, 75, 245-269.
3.
Bunting, T. E. , & Cousins, L. R. (1985). Environmental dispositions among school-age children. Environment and Behavior, 17(6), 725-768.
4.
Chawla, L. (1988). Children’s concern for the natural environment. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 13-20.
5.
Clayton, S. (1998). Preference for macrojustice versus microjustice in environmental decisions. Environment & Behavior, 30, 162-183.
6.
Daily, G. , & Ehrlich, P. (1997/1998). Population extinction and the biodiversity crisis. Wild Earth, 7(4), 35-45.
7.
Damon, W. (1977). The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Davidson, P. , Turiel, E., & Black, A. (1983). The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children’s social reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 49-65.
9.
Dunker, K. (1939). Ethical relativity? An enquiry into the psychology of ethics. Mind, 48, 39-57.
10.
Eisenberg, N. , & Fabes, R. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 710-778). New York: John Wiley.
11.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Grant, L. (1996). Juggernaut: Growth on a finite planet. Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press.
14.
Hatch, E. (1983). Culture and morality. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
Helwig, C. C. (1997). The role of agent and social context in judgments of freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 68, 484-495.
16.
Hertsgaard, M. (1998). Earth odyssey: Around the world in search of our environmental future. New York: Broadway Books.
17.
Howe, D. , Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Friedman, B. (1996). Along the Rio Negro: Brazilian children’s environmental views and values. Developmental Psychology, 32, 979-987.
18.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics, 28, 57-72.
19.
Irvine, S. (1997/1998, Winter). The great denial: Puncturing pro-natalist myths. Wild Earth, 7(4), 8-17.
20.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1991). Bounding the controversies: Foundational issues in the study of moral development. Human Development, 34, 325-340.
21.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1992). Children’s obligatory and discretionary moral judgments. Child Development, 63, 416-430.
22.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1997a). Children’s moral and ecological reasoning about the Prince William Sound oil spill. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1091-1096.
23.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1997b). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliation with nature. Developmental Review, 17, 1-61.
24.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. , & Friedman, B. (1995). Environmental views and values of children in an innercity Black community. Child Development, 66, 1403-1417.
26.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. , & Friedman, B. (1998). On nature and environmental education: Black parents speak from the inner city. Environmental Education Research, 4, 25-39.
27.
Kahn, P. H., Jr. , & Kellert, S. R. (in press). (Eds.). Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Kellert, S. R. (1996). The value of life. Washington, DC: Island Press.
29.
Killen, M. (1996). Justice and care: Dichotomies or coexistence?Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 2(1), 42-58.
30.
Killen, M. , & Turiel, E. (1998). Adolescents’and young adults’evaluations of helping and sacrificing for others. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 355-375.
31.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays in moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
32.
Laupa, M. (1991). Children’s reasoning about three authority attributes: Adult status, knowledge, and social position. Developmental Psychology, 27, 321-329.
33.
Lourenço, O. (1990). From cost-perception to gain-construction: Toward a Piagetian explanation of the development of altruism in children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 119-132.
34.
Lourenço, O. M. (1993). Toward a Piagetian explanation of the development of prosocial behavior in children: Theforceof negational thinking. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 91-106.
35.
Marascuilo, L. A. , & McSweeney, M. (1977). Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36.
McKibben, B. (1998). Maybe one: A personal and environmental argument for single-child families. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
Miller, J. G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the morality of caring: Individually oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 3-39.
38.
Mohai, P. (1997). Gender differences in the perception of most important environmental problems. Race, Gender & Class, 5, 153-169.
39.
Nelson, R. (1989). The island within. New York: Random House.
40.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Nucci, L. (1996). Morality and the personal sphere of actions. In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 41-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Piaget, J. (1960). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co. (Original work published 1929)
43.
Piaget, J. (1969). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
44.
Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. History, theory, and methods (4th ed., pp. 103-128). New York: John Wiley.
45.
Shweder, R. A. , Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. B. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1-82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Smetana, J. G. (1995). Morality in context: Abstractions, ambiguities and applications. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 10, pp. 83-130). London: Jessica Kingsley.
47.
Snarey, J. (1985). The cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202-232.
48.
Stone, C. D. (1986). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. In D. VanDeVeer & C. Pierce (Eds.), People, penguins, and plastic trees (pp. 83-96). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
49.
Tisak, M. S. (1995). Domains of social reasoning and beyond. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 11, pp. 95-130). London: Jessica Kingsley.
50.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Turiel, E. (1998). Moral development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863-932). New York: John Wiley.
52.
Turiel, E. , Killen, M., & Helwig, C. C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions and vagaries. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 155-244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Wainryb, C. (1995). Reasoning about social conflicts in different cultures: Druze and Jewish children in Israel. Child Development, 66, 390-401.
54.
Wainryb, C. (2000). Values and truths: The making and judging of moral decisions. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & M. Laupa (Ed.), Rights and wrongs: How children and young adults evaluate the world. New directions for child development (pp. 33-46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
