Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
The need for a sexual safety framework: Deployment-related sexual violence against US servicewomen and implications for the women,peace,and security agenda
This article examines the elevated risk of sexual violence experienced by US servicewomen during deployment and the implications of internal military sexual violence for the prevention of conflict-related sexual violence against civilians. Drawing on qualitative interviews with servicewomen, this study highlights how deployment environments amplify harassment and assault, perpetuated by a culture of warrior masculinity and institutional tolerance for gendered aggression. I show that predeployment briefings and informal mentorships warn women of sexual danger on deployment. In deployment settings, women are instructed to rely on hypervigilant individual strategies, such as walking in pairs or living near other women, rather than being supported by systemic institutional safeguards. These informal and gendered risk-management practices reflect an organizational awareness of sexual threat that coexists with institutional inaction or dismissal when violence occurs. The article situates these findings within the framework of the United Nations’ women, peace, and security agenda and the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, emphasizing that militaries’ capacity to protect civilians from conflict-related sexual violence should account for how they address sexual violence within their own ranks. It argues that internal sexual violence is not distinct from conflict-related sexual violence but interconnected through shared environments of militarized aggression. The article calls for a systemic lens of sexual safety to be integrated into leadership, operations, practices, and policies, finding this is essential to ensure institutional accountability for sexual violence against servicemembers and civilians.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4(2): 139–158.
2.
AckerJ (1992) From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology21(5): 565–570.
3.
AllardCBNunninkSGregoryAM, et al (2011) Military sexual trauma research: A proposed agenda. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation12: 324–345.
4.
AllsepM (2013) The myth of the warrior: Martial masculinity and the end of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Journal of Homosexuality60(2–3): 381–400.
5.
AntecolHCobb-ClarkD (2001) Men, women and sexual harassment in the U.S. military. Gender Issues19(1): 3–18.
6.
BarrettFJ (1996) The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the U.S. Navy. Gender, Work & Organization3(3): 129–142.
7.
BarthSKKimerlingREPavaoJ, et al (2016) Military sexual trauma among recent veterans. American Journal of Preventive Medicine50: 77–86.
8.
BastickMGrimmKKunzR (2007) Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict: Global Overview and Implications for the Security Sector. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
9.
Bayard de VoloLHallL (2015) ‘I wish all the ladies were holes in the road’: The U.S. Air Force Academy and the gendered continuum of violence. Signs40(4): 865–889.
10.
BelkinA (2012) Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
BonnesS (2017) The bureaucratic harassment of U.S. servicewomen. Gender & Society31(6): 804–829.
12.
BonnesS (2022) Femininity anchors: Heterosexual relationships and pregnancy as sites of harassment for U.S. servicewomen. American Sociological Review87(4): 618–643.
13.
BonnesS (2024) Hardship Duty: Women’s Experiences with Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, and Discrimination in the U.S. Military. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
BonnesS (2025) Sacrificing the feminine to fit in and embracing the feminine to stand out: Servicewomen’s response to the essentialist gendered practices of the U.S. military. Journal of Femininities2(1): 1–35.
15.
BonnesSTostoS (2023) Prosecuting military sexual assault: The entanglement of military discourse and victim stereotypes in prosecutor case strategies. Feminist Criminology18(5): 459–489.
16.
BostockDJDaleyG (2007) Lifetime and current sexual assault and harassment: Victimization rates of active-duty United States Air Force women. Violence Against Women13: 927–944.
17.
BuchananNTSettlesIHHallATO’ConnorRC (2014) A review of organizational strategies for reducing sexual harassment: Insights from the U. S. military. Journal of Social Issues70: 687–702.
18.
CallahanJ (2009) Manifestations of power and control: Training as the catalyst for scandal at the United States air force academy. Violence Against Women15(10): 1149–1168.
19.
CampbellR (2002) Emotionally Involved: The Impact of Researching Rape. New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
21.
CharmazK (2012) The power and potential of grounded theory. Medical Sociology Online6: 2–15.
22.
CohenDK (2013a) Explaining rape during civil war: Cross-national evidence (1980–2009). American Political Science Review107(3): 461–477.
23.
CohenDK (2013b) Female combatants and the perpetration of violence: Wartime rape in the Sierra Leone civil war. World Politics65(3): 383–415.
24.
CohenDKNordåsR (2014) Sexual violence in armed conflict: Introducing the SVAC dataset, 1989–2009. Journal of Peace Research51(3): 418–428.
25.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
26.
ConnellC (2022) A Few Good Gays: The Gendered Impact of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell on Military Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
ConnellRW (2005) The social organization of masculinity. In: ConnellR (ed.) Masculinities, 2nd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp.67–81.
DeterdingNMWatersMC (2021) Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first century approach. Sociological Methods & Research50(2): 708–739.
31.
DuncansonC (2009) Forces for good? Narratives of military masculinity in peacekeeping operations. International Feminist Journal of Politics11(1): 63–80.
32.
EdmondsSWMengelingMSyropC, et al (2021) Associations between sexual assault and reproductive and family planning behaviors and outcomes in female veterans. Obstetrics & Gynecology137(3): 461–470.
33.
EmersonR (2001) Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
34.
EnloeC (2000) Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
EnloeC (2013) Combat and ‘combat’: A feminist reflection. Critical Studies on Security1(2): 260–263.
36.
EsterbergKG (2002) Qualitative Methods in Social Research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
37.
FineMWeisLWeseenS, et al (2000) For whom? Qualitative research representations and social responsibilities. In: DenzinNLincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.107–131.
38.
FontanaAFreyJ (1994) Interviewing: The art of science. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.361–376.
39.
GeertzC (1973) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: GeertzC (ed.) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic Books, pp.3–30.
40.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
41.
HaleHC (2012) The role of practice in the development of military masculinities. Gender, Work & Organization19(6): 699–722.
42.
HartCG (2021) Trajectory guarding: Managing unwanted, ambiguously sexual interactions at work. American Sociological Review86(2): 256–278.
HigatePR (2002) Traditional gendered identities: National service and the all-volunteer force. In: MjøsetL.van HoldeS. (eds) The Comparative Study of Conscription in the Armed Forces. Comparative Social Research, vol. 20, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp.229–235.
45.
HinojosaR (2010) Doing hegemony: Military, men, and constructing a hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Men’s Studies18(2): 179–194.
HoskinRA (2019) Femmephobia: The role of anti-femininity and gender policing in LGBTQ+ people’s experiences of discrimination. Sex Roles81: 686–703.
48.
HoskinRA (2020) ‘Femininity? It’s the aesthetic of subordination’: Examining femmephobia, the gender binary, and experiences of oppression among sexual and gender minorities. Archives of Sexual Behavior49: 2319–2339.
49.
HumphreysMWeinsteinJM (2006) Handling and manhandling civilians in civil war. American Political Science Review100(3): 429–447.
50.
HutchingsK (2008) Making sense of masculinity and war. Men and Masculinities10(4): 389–404.
51.
Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military (2021) Report of the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
52.
JeffreysS (2007) Double jeopardy: Women, the U.S. military and the war in Iraq. Women’s Studies International Forum30(1): 16–25.
53.
Karazi-PreslerT (2021) Gendered power at work: Constituting moral worth in a hyper-masculine organizational culture. Cultural Sociology15(3): 409–429.
54.
Karazi-PreslerTWassermanV (2022) ‘Hold your nose and harness these men’: Sexual vulnerability in a hyper-masculine organization: A barrier or a resource?Organization31(3): 547–566.
55.
KimerlingRGimaKSmithMW, et al (2007) The Veterans Health Administration and military sexual trauma. American Journal of Public Health97(12): 2160–2166.
56.
KimerlingRStreetAEPavaoJ, et al (2010) Military-related sexual trauma among Veterans Health Administration patients returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. American Journal of Public Health100(8): 1409–1412.
57.
KoosC (2015) What do we know about sexual violence in armed conflicts? Recent empirical progress and remaining gaps in peace and conflict research. GIGA working paper no. 275. Available at: https://pure.giga-hamburg.de/ws/files/21213223/wp275_koos.pdf
58.
LareauA (2021) Listening to People: A Practical Guide to Interviewing, Participant Observation, Data Analysis, and Writing It All Up. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
LeathermanJ (2007) Sexual violence and armed conflict: Complex dynamics of re-victimization. International Journal of Peace Studies12(1): 53–71.
60.
LetherbyG (2003) Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
61.
LoflandJSnowDAndersonL, et al (2006) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 4th edn. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
62.
Lomsky-FederESasson-LevyO (2018) Women Soldiers and Citizenship in Israel: Gendered Encounters with the State. Abingdon: Routledge.
63.
MartinPY (2004) Gender as social institution. Social Forces82(4): 1249–1273.
64.
McKinneyK (1992) Contrapower sexual harassment: The effects of student sex and type of behavior on faculty perceptions. Sex Roles27(11–12): 627–643.
MillarKMTidyJ (2017) Combat as a moving target: Masculinities, the heroic soldier myth, and normative martial violence. Critical Military Studies3(2): 142–160.
67.
MonteithLLBahrainiNHMatarazzoBB, et al (2016) Perceptions of institutional betrayal predict suicidal self-directed violence among veterans exposed to military sexual trauma. Journal of Clinical Psychology72(7): 743–755.
68.
PascoeCJ (2007) Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
69.
RismanBJ (2004) Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society18(4): 429–450.
70.
RubinHJRubinIS (2012) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
SadlerABBoothBCookBL, et al (2003) Factors associated with women’s risk of rape in the military environment. American Journal of Industrial Medicine43(3): 262–273.
72.
SadlerABMengelingMBoothB, et al (2017) The relationship between US military officer leadership behaviors and risk of sexual assault of reserve, national guard, and active component servicewomen in non-deployed locations. American Journal of Public Health107(1): 147–155.
73.
Sasson-LevyO (2003) Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in ‘masculine’ roles. Sociological Inquiry73(3): 440–465.
74.
SeifertR (1996) The second front: The logic of sexual violence in wars. Women’s Studies International Forum19(1–2): 35–43.
75.
SilinsS (2024) ‘“I just don’t want to be part of it anymore”: How harm and betrayal erode cohesion in the aftermath of military sexual misconduct. Armed Forces & Society.
76.
SkinnerKKressinNFrayneS, et al (2000) The prevalence of military sexual assault among female veterans’ administration outpatients. Journal of Interpersonal Violence15(3): 291–310.
77.
SmallMLCalarcoJ (2022) Qualitative Literacy: A Guide to Evaluating Ethnographic Interview Research. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
78.
SnyderCGabbardWMayJD, et al (2006) On the battleground of women’s bodies: Mass rape in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work21(2): 184–195.
79.
StanderVAThomsenCJ (2016) Sexual harassment and assault in the U.S. military: A review of policy and research trends. Military Medicine181: 20–27.
80.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
SteidlCRBrookshireAR (2018) ‘Just one of the guys until shower time’: How symbolic embodiment threatens women’s inclusion in the U.S. military. Gender, Work & Organization25(5): 1–18.
82.
TexeiraM (2002) ‘Who protects and serves me?’ A case study of sexual harassment of African American women in one U.S. law enforcement agency. Gender & Society16(4): 524–545.
TimmermansSTavoryI (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory30(3): 167–186.
85.
TostoSBonnesS (2025) ‘She clearly thought that something bad had happened to her’: How military lawyers construct narratives of victim legitimacy and perceived harm in sexual assault cases. Armed Forces and Society52(2): 695–713.
86.
TurchikJWilsonS (2010) Sexual assault in the U.S. military: A review of the literature and recommendations for the future. Aggression and Violent Behavior15(4): 267–277.
87.
United Nations (1995) Beijing declaration and platform for action. In: Adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, China, 15 September.
United States Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (2024) Department of Defense fiscal year 2023 annual report on sexual assault in the military. Washington, DC: United States Department of Defense.
WarnerCArmstrongM (2020) The role of military law and systemic issues in the military’s handling of sexual assault cases. Law & Society Review54(1): 265–300.
99.
WhitworthS (2008) Militarized masculinity and post-traumatic stress disorder. In: ParpartJLZalewskiM (eds) Rethinking the Man Question: Sex, Gender and Violence in International Relations. London: Zed Books, pp.109–126.
100.
WilsonLC (2016) The prevalence of military sexual trauma: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse19(5): 584–597.
101.
WingfieldAHChavezK (2020) Getting in, getting hired, getting sideways looks: Organizational hierarchy and perceptions of racial discrimination. American Sociological Review85(1): 31–57.
