Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in Military Services: Culture,Hypermasculinity,and the Futility of Zero-Tolerance Approaches

Abstract

This introduction to the Special Forum on Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in Military Services begins with a discussion of zero-tolerance approaches to sexual assault and sexual harassment, arguing that such approaches tend to be ineffective and result in problematic outcomes. Furthermore, zero-tolerance approaches are associated with the same hypermasculine cultural practices that contribute to the prevalence of sexual assault and sexual harassment within the military. The articles that are summarized in this Forum cover a range of inquiries, which apply differing substantive, theoretical, and methodological approaches to address issues related to sexual assault and sexual harassment. Together, the articles in this compendium demonstrate the importance of aligning structural interventions with the cultures of the institutions in which the interventions will be implemented. They also reinforce the futility of zero-tolerance approaches and the importance of recognizing the significant complexities associated with sexual assault and sexual harassment in military services.

Keywords

sexual assault sexual harassment zero-tolerance hypermasculinity gender issues military culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Åkerström

(1991). Betrayal and betrayers: The sociology of treachery. Transaction.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362

Bonnes

(2024). Hardship duty: Women’s experiences with sexual harassment, sexual assault, and discrimination in the U.S. military. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197636244.001.0001

Breede

H. C.

Davis

K. D.

(2021). Eliminate or calibrate? Reflecting and recasting the warrior identity in the Canadian military. Centre for International and Defence Policy. https://medium.com/centre-for-international-and-defence-policy/eliminate-or-calibrate-reflecting-and-recasting-the-warrior-identity-in-the-canadian-military-b9c5936302e

Breslin

R. A.

Davis

Hylton

Hill

Klauberg

Petusky

Klahr

(2019). 2018 Workplace and gender relations survey of active duty members. Office of People Analytics. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1071721.pdf

Cotter

Burczycka

(2023). Sexual misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces, 2022. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/85-603-X2023001

Doob

A. N.

Webster

C. M.

Gartner

(2014). Issues related to harsh sentences and mandatory minimum sentences: General deterrence and incapacitation. Criminological Highlights. http://criminology.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/DWG-GeneralDeterrenceHighlights14Feb2013.pdf

Dursun

Fossey

(2024). Sexual violence in the military, Technical report AC/323(HFM-295)TP/1129. The NATO Science and Technology Organization.

Eichler

(2014). Militarized masculinities in international relations. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1), 81–93.

10.

Enloe

(1988). Does khaki become you?: The militarization of women’s lives. University of California.

11.

Feldblum

C. R.

Lipnic

(2016). Select Task Force on the study of harassment in the workplace. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/select-task-force-study-harassment-workplace#_Toc453686298

12.

Gendreau

Goggin

Cullen

F. T.

(1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Solicitor General Canada.

13.

Hunt

Davidson

Fielden

Hoel

(2007). Sexual harassment in the workplace: A literature review. Manchester Business School, University of Manchester & Equal Opportunities Commission.

14.

Johnstone

Tait-Signal

(2023). Sexual misconduct, civil-military relations, and the Canadian Armed Forces. Armed Forces & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221148498

15.

Jonson

C. L.

(2010). The impact of imprisonment on reoffending a meta-analysis [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Cincinnati. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/ucin1285687754/inline

16.

Kovandzic

T. V.

Sloan

J. J.

Vieraitis

L. M.

(2002). Unintended consequences of politically popular sentencing policy: The homicide promoting effects of “Three Strikes” laws in U.S. cities (1980–1999). Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00100.x

17.

Lade

Brown

Ritchie

Milman

Park

Heber

Lanius

Davis

K. D.

McNeely

H. E.

McKinnon

(2026). The impact of military sexual misconduct on the deployment experiences of woman-identifying Canadian veterans. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 714–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X241312206

18.

Lucas

J. W.

Hanges

P. J.

Beavan

Epistola

Forgo

Shapiro

D. L.

(2026). Perceptions of espoused versus enacted culture around sexual misconduct and other offenses among U.S. military service members. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 549–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X231153434

19.

MacKenzie

(2023). Good soldiers don’t rape. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009273985

20.

Marvell

T. B.

Moody

C. E.

(2001). The lethal effects of three strikes laws. The Journal of Legal Studies, 30, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/468112

21.

Masse

(2023). Military masculinity at a crossroads: Soldiering beyond the warrior ethos. In Eichler

Whelan

Aluie

Smith-Evans

(Eds.), Military masculinity and culture change in the Canadian Armed Forces [Briefing paper] (pp. 31–35). Centre for Social Innovation and Community Engagement in Military Affairs, Mount Saint Vincent University.

22.

Miller

L. L.

Farris

Williams

K. M.

(2018). Challenges to evaluating U.S. military policy on sexual assault and sexual harassment. Military Psychology, 30(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2017.1421821

23.

Monin

Sawyer

P. J.

Marquez

M. J.

(2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.76

24.

Nagin

D. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

(2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime & Justice, 38, 115–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/599202

25.

Njoku

E. T.

Dery

Romaniuk

S. N.

(2026). Moral injury: A framework for understanding conflict-related sexual violence against men. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X241259708

26.

Pearce

Silins

(2025). Key results from the sexual misconduct section of the programs & policies 2023 your say survey [Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis presentation]. Defence Research and Development Canada.

27.

Ritchie

(2011). Does imprisonment deter? A review of the evidence. Sentencing Advisory Council. http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/1128_sac.pdf

28.

Roehling

M. V.

(2020). The effective use of zero-tolerance sexual harassment policies: An interdisciplinary assessment. Labor Law Journal, 71(2), 89–96.

29.

Rosen

L. N.

Knudson

K. H.

Fancher

(2003). Cohesion and the culture of hypermasculinity in U.S. Army Units. Armed Forces & Society, 29(3), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0302900302

30.

Rubenfeld

LeBlanc

M. M.

Messervey

D. L.

Howell

G. T.

Houle

S. A.

(2026). Sexual misconduct in the military: The impact of situational factors on bystander intervention strategies. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X251316266

31.

Rubenfeld

Russell

(2021). Sexual misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces: Senior non-commissioned members’ perspectives (Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2021-R128). Defence Research and Development Canada.

32.

Silins

(2026). “I just don’t want to be part of it anymore”: How harm and betrayal erode cohesion in the aftermath of military sexual misconduct. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 628–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X241257515

33.

Smith

Goggin

Gendreau

(2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences. Solicitor General Canada.

34.

Spijkers

A. S.

Snoek

Molewijk

van Baarle

(2026). Complexities and possibilities of strengthening the social inclusion of military women in the Netherlands Armed Forces: Findings from an action research project. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 576–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X241279184

35.

Stockdale

M. S.

Bisom-Rapp

O’Connor

Gutek

B. A.

(2004). Coming to terms with zero-tolerance sexual harassment policies. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v04n01_05

36.

Tosto

S. A.

Bonnes

(2026). “She clearly thought that something bad had happened to her”: How military lawyers construct narratives of victim legitimacy and perceived harm in sexual assault cases. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221108526

37.

Wang

Murnighan

J. K.

(2017). The dynamics of punishment and trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1385–1402. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000178

38.

Winerip

(2013, May 13). Revisiting the military’s “Tailhook scandal.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/13/booming/revisiting-the-militarys-tailhook-scandal-video.html

39.

M. E.

Nicol

A. A. M.

Ralph

C. S.

(2026). Masculine conformity and social dominance’s relation with organizational culture change. Armed Forces & Society, 52(2), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X231178522