This ethnographic study examines how Korean mothers of young adults with severe developmental disabilities reinterpret Western notions of independent living through locally embedded frameworks of selfhood. Drawing on 2 years of fieldwork with the Korean Parents’ Network for People with Disabilities and in-depth interviews with 31 activist mothers, this article argues that activist mothers reframe independence not only as self-sufficiency but also as the capacity to claim socially recognized roles through community participation based on a sociocultural understanding of personhood. Concretely, through the vision of a ‘meaningful daytime’, mothers seek pathways for their children to restore their independent selves by entitling social titles and responsibilities embedded in social relationships. This reinterpretation further prompted mothers to reflect on their own erosion of identity as long-term caregiving extended. Foregrounding fluid, contextual, and performative approaches to selfhood, this article concludes by theorizing the cultural translation of mobilizing ideas within non-Western disability justice and human rights movements, expanding current sociological debates on globalization, intersectionality, and rights discourse.
AbrutynSZhangJ (2024) Morality, affect, and reputation in the making of a motivated social self. Sociological Theory42(1): 73–96.
2.
AddlakhaR (2020) Kinship destabilized! Disability and the micropolitics of care in urban India. Current Anthropology61(S21): S46–S54.
3.
AppaduraiA (2000) Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture12(1): 1–19.
4.
BorsayA (1990) Disability and attitudes to family care in Britain: Towards a sociological perspective. Disability, Handicap & Society5(2): 107–122.
5.
BoscoFJ (2006) The Madres de Plaza de Mayo and three decades of human rights activism: Embeddedness, emotions, and social movements. Annals of the Association of American Geographers96: 342–365.
6.
BurrV (2015) Social Constructionism, 3rd edn.London: Routledge.
7.
CallahanD (1988) Families as caregivers: The limits of morality. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation69: 13–18.
8.
CallusA-MCamilleri-ZahraA (2017) Nothing about us without us: Disabled people determining their human rights through the UNCRPD. Mediterranean Review of Human Rights1: 1–26.
9.
ChangH (2016) From housewives to activists: Lived experiences of mothers for disability rights in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies3: 34–59.
10.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
11.
ChoiCO’BrienM (2019) The impact of familism on future care planning for Korean parents caring for their children living with disabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development29(4): 264–277.
12.
ChouY-CChenB-WKrögerT (2023) Lost in translation: Implementing personal assistance in an East Asian context. Disability & Society38(4): 587–609.
13.
CloughB (2021) Disability and care: Theoretical antagonisms revisited. In: CloughBHerringJ (eds) Disability, Care and Family Law. London: Routledge, pp.13–30.
EnglundH (2006) Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
16.
FinchJMasonJ (2003) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.
17.
FritschK (2010) Intimate assemblages: Disability, intercorporeality, and the labour of attendant care. Critical Disability Discourses10(1): 2025.
18.
GinsburgFRappR (2013) Disability worlds. Annual Review of Anthropology42: 53–68.
19.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
20.
GlennEN (2010) Forced to Care: Coercion and Caregiving in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
22.
GoodaleM (2009) Surrendering to Utopia: An Anthropology of Human Rights. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
GoodleyDSwartzL (2016) The place of disability. In: GrechSSoldaticK (eds) Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook. Cham: Springer, pp. 69–83.
24.
GrechS (2015) Disability and Poverty in the Global South: Renegotiating Development in Guatemala. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
GriffithsM (2023) Declare independence. The International Journal of Disability and Social Justice3(1): 24–41.
26.
GrinkerR (2020) Autism, ‘stigma’, disability: A shifting historical terrain. Current Anthropology61(S21): S55–S67.
27.
HarpurP (2012) Embracing the new disability rights paradigm: The importance of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Disability & Society27(1): 1–14.
28.
HayashiROkuhiraM (2008) The independent living movement in Asia: Solidarity from Japan. Disability & Society23(5): 417–429.
29.
HeineSJ (2001) Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality69(6): 881–905.
30.
Hillcoat-NallétambyS (2014) The meaning of ‘independence’ for older people in different residential settings. Journal of Gerontology69(3): 419–430.
31.
HolnessW (2022) Parent-led activism and children with disabilities in South Africa. In: RiouxMHVieraJBuettgenA, et al (eds) Handbook of Disability. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp.1–43.
32.
HwangSKKimKMLeeCE (2024) Current debates regarding deinstitutionalisation for disabled people in South Korea. Disability & Society39(9): 2447–2452.
33.
IngstadBWhyteSR (eds) (2007) Disability in Local and Global Worlds. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
34.
JungM (2024) Rights project: A relational sociology of rights in globalization. Sociological Theory42(3): 256–281.
KimE (2011) Heaven for disabled people: Nationalism and international human rights imagery. Disability & Society26(10): 93–106.
37.
KimE (2017) Curative Violence: Rehabilitating Disability, Gender, and Sexuality in Modern Korea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
KondoDK (1990) Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. University of Chicago Press.
39.
KittayEF (2015) A theory of justice as fair terms of social life given our inevitable dependency and our inextricable interdependency. In: EngsterDHamingtonM (eds) Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.51–71.
40.
LatherP (1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy Within/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
41.
LevitskySR (2014) Caring for Our Own: Why There Is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
LindemannH (2009) Holding one another (well, wrongly, clumsily) in time of dementia. Metaphilosophy40(3–4): 416–424.
43.
LovernL (2021) Indigenous concepts of difference: An alternative to western disability labeling. Disability Studies Quarterly41(4).
44.
McDonaldGOxfordM (1995) History of Independent Living. Dayton, OH: Access Center for Independent Living.
45.
McLaughlinJ (2012) Understanding disabled families: Replacing tales of burden with ties of interdependency. In: WatsonNRoulstoneAThomasC (eds) Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Routledge, pp.402–413.
46.
McLaughlinJGoodleyDClaveringEK, et al (2008) Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
MarksD (1997) Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation19(3): 85–91.
48.
MarkusHRKitayamaS (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review98(2): 224–253.
49.
MendozaEFO (2023) Maternal activism in comparative perspective: Past, present, and future. Sociology Compass17(6): e13088.
50.
MerrySE (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
MilesS (1996) Engaging with the disability rights movement: The experience of community-based rehabilitation in Southern Africa. Disability & Society11(4): 501–517.
52.
MladenovTCojocariuIBAngelova-MladenovaL, et al (2023) Independent living in Europe and beyond: Past, present, and future [Special issue editorial]. International Journal of Disability and Social Justice3(1): 4–23.
53.
MutuaM (2001) Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphors of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal42(1): 201–245.
54.
NaplesNA (1992) Activist mothering: Cross-generational continuity in the community work of women from low-income urban neighborhoods. Gender & Society6(3): 441–463.
55.
NicolaisenI (1995) Persons and nonpersons: Disability and personhood among the Punan Bah of Central Borneo. In: IngstadBWhyteSR (eds) Disability and Culture. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp.38–55.
56.
OhJ (2023) Between ‘devoted mothers’ and ‘disability advocates’: When Korean mothers of developmentally disabled adults become committed to social change. Ethos51(4): 416–431.
57.
OliverMBarnesC (2012) The New Politics of Disablement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
ParkSJAbelmannN (2004) Class and cosmopolitan striving: Mothers’ management of English education in South Korea. Anthropological Quarterly77(4): 645–672.
59.
PriestleyM (1999) Disability Politics and Community Care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
60.
QuY (2020) Understanding the body and disability in Chinese contexts. Disability & Society35(5): 738–759.
61.
ReindalSM (1999) Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability & Society14(3): 353–367.
ShapiroJ (1994) No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Three Rivers Press.
64.
SmithSR (2001) Distorted ideals: ‘The problem of dependency’ and the mythology of independent living. Social Theory and Practice27(4): 579–598.
65.
SuiJChangHLShihuiH (2009) Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition. Social Neuroscience4(5): 402–411.
66.
TarrantA (2022) Independent living as a counter-narrative. The International Journal of Disability and Social Justice2(1): 48–73.
67.
TaylorC (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
TraustadottirR (1991) Mothers who care: Gender, disability, and family life. Journal of Family Issues12(2): 211–228.
69.
TurmusaniM (2001) Work and adulthood: Economic survival in the majority world. In: PriestlyM (ed.) Disability and the Life Course: Global Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.192–205.
70.
YouHKMcGrawL (2011) The intersection of motherhood and disability: Being a ‘good’ Korean mother to an ‘imperfect’ child. Journal of Comparative Family Studies42(4): 579–598.
