This article examines the experiences of disabled women in the context of sexuality and motherhood. Disability is a highly stigmatised identity and women with disability are viewed as asexual, dependent, in need of care, and therefore incapable of performing the culturally approved ‘womanly’ role of a sexual partner and nurturing mother. This article cites a range of cross-cultural studies that demonstrate how disabled women engage with sexuality and procreation. It examines how patriarchal social structures regulate the sexuality and fertility of women with disabilities and define and construct their humanity and personhood. It argues for a nuanced approach that respects the rights of women with disabilities to bodily integrity and personal dignity and at the same time takes cognisance of their need for support and assistance while making decisions about their bodies and lives.
AddlakhaR. (2007). Gender, subjectivity and sexual identity: How young people with disabilities conceptualise the body, sex and marriage in urban India (Occasional Paper). New Delhi: CWDS.
2.
AddlakhaR. (2008a). Introduction: Disability, gender and society.Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Special Issue, 15(2), 191–207.
3.
AddlakhaR. (2008b). Deconstructing mental illness: An ethnography of psychiatry, women and the family.New Delhi: Zubaan Books.
4.
AddlakhaR. (Ed.). (2013). Disability studies in India: Global discourses, local realities.New Delhi: Routledge.
5.
BhambaniM. (2009). Societal responses to women with disabilities in India. In AddlakhaR., BlumeS., DevliegerP., NagaseO. & WinanceM. (Eds), Disability and society: A reader (pp. 233–245). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
6.
ChibM. (2015). I feel normal inside. Outside, my body isn’t! In HansA. (Ed.), Disability, gender and the trajectories of power (pp. 93–112). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
7.
DavarB. (1999). Mental health of Indian women: A feminist agenda.New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
8.
DavarB. (2001). Mental health from a gender perspective.New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
DhandaA. (2008). Sameness and difference: Twin track empowerment for women with disabilities.Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Special Issue, 15(2), 209–32.
11.
Forum for Women’s Health. (1994). In the guise of human dignity. Retrieved 11November2014, from http://www.unipune.ac.in/snc/cssh/HumanRights/07%20STATE%20AND%20GENDER/12.pdf
12.
GeraSonal (2015). TV actress Sonal Vengurlekar not happy with ‘sexuality’ in ‘Margarita, with a straw’, writes open letter to Shonali Bose. Retrieved 25April2015, from indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/entertainment-others/tvactress
13.
GhaiA. (2002). Disabled women: An excluded agenda of Indian feminism.Hypatia, 17(3), 49–66.
GhoshNandini (2013). Bhalo Meye: Cultural construction of gender and disability in Bengal. In AddlakhaRenu (Ed.), Disability studies in India: Global discourses, local realities. London, New York, New Delhi: Routledge.
16.
GrueL., & LaerumK.T. (2002). Doing motherhood: Some experiences of mothers with physical disabilities.Disability & Society, 17(6), 671–83.
17.
GuptaS. (2013). No looking back.New Delhi: Rupa Publications.
18.
HaldarS. (2015). Tale of married women with disabilities: An oxymoron reality? In HansA. (Ed.), Disability, gender and the trajectories of power (pp. 121–32). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
19.
HansA. (Ed.). (2015). Disability, gender and the trajectories of power. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
KakarS. (2008). The inner world: A psycho-analytic study of childhood and society in India (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
22.
KallianesV., & RubenfeldP. (1997). Disabled women and reproductive rights.Disability & Society, 12(2), 203–22.
23.
KhanalN.A. (2013). Status of reproductive health and experience of motherhood of disabled women in Nepal (Report submitted to the Social Inclusion Research Fund (SIRF) Kathmandu, Nepal). Kathmandu, Nepal: Social Inclusion Research Fund (SIRF). Retrieved from http://www.socialinclusion.org.np/new/files/Neeti%20Aryal%20Khanal_1380089047dW5d.pdf
24.
LimayeS. (2008). The inner world of adolescent girls with hearing impairments: Two case studies.Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Special Issue,15(2), 387–406.
25.
LimayeS. (2015). A disabled mother’s journey in raising her child. In HansA. (Ed.), Disability, gender and the trajectories of power (pp. 133–54). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
26.
MalacridaC. (2009). Performing motherhood in a disablist world: Dilemmas of motherhood, femininity and disability.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,22(1), 99–117.
27.
MehrotraN. (2004). Women, disability and social support in rural Haryana.Economic and Political Weekly, 39(52), 5640–44.
28.
MehrotraN. (2006). Negotiating gender and disability in rural Haryana.Sociological Bulletin, 55(3), 406–26.
29.
MehrotraN. (2013). Disability, gender and state policy: Exploring margins.Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
30.
MehrotraN., & NayarM. (2013). Women and psycho-social disabilities among the urban poor. In MehrotraN. (Ed.), Disability, gender and state policy: Exploring margins (pp. 208–36). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
31.
MehrotraN., & NayarM. (2015). Women with psycho-social disabilities: Shifting the lens from medical to social. In HansA. (Ed.), Disability, gender and the trajectories of power (pp. 72–90). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
32.
MehrotraN., & VaidyaS. (2008). Exploring constructs of intellectual disability and personhood in Haryana and Delhi.Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Special Issue, 15(2), 317–40.
33.
MorrisJ. (1995). Creating a space for absent voices: Disabled women’s experience of receiving assistance with daily living activities.Feminist Review,51(Autumn), 68–93.
34.
RastogiP., & YadavM. (2010). Issue of consent for MTP by orphan, major and mentally retarded: A critical review.Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine,32(3), 267–74.
35.
Sunder RajanR. (2005). Beyond the hysterectomies scandal: Women, the institution, family and state. In KannabiranK. (Ed.), The violence of normal times (pp. 121–171). New Delhi: Women Unlimited.
36.
TARSHI. (2010). Sexuality and disability in the Indian context (Working Paper). New Delhi: TARSHI.
37.
The Punekar. (2008, January22). At peace in Shirur, site of mass hysterectomies. The Indian Express report. Retrieved 11November2014, from http://www.thepunekar.com/at-peace-in-shirur-site-of-masshysterectomies/2008/01/
38.
ThomasC. (1997/2009). The baby and the bath water: Disabled women and motherhood in social context. In AddlakhaR., BlumeS., DevligerP., NagaseO. and WinanceM. (Eds), Disability and society: A reader (pp. 246–270). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.
39.
TilleyE., WalmsleyJ., EarleS., & AtkinsonD. (2012). The silence is roaring: Sterilisation reproductive rights and women with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 27(3), 413–26.
40.
TripathiD. (2014, 7February). Her story. Retrieved 11November2014, from http://www.frontline.in/social-issues/general-issues/her-story/article5601365.ece?homepage=true
41.
VaidyaS. (2013). Disability, sexuality and motherhood (Unit-2, Block-2 Course MWG004, MA in Women’s and Gender Studies). New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Open University, School of Gender and Development Studies.
