This article focuses on the boards of Italian top-ranked sociology journals by conceiving of them as an affiliation network formed by scholars participating in the same journals’ editorial boards as members. We consider the space formed by editorial memberships in these journals as a social space and analyse it by means of network-analytic and factorial techniques, providing a field-theoretic representation of such space. Through Cluster Correspondence Analysis, we look at how the different clusters (network positions) relate to each other and to what extent journals’ patterns of board participation differ through clusters. Our findings show how this social space is structured along dimensions that oppose journals and scholars by reason of their mutual relationships (interlocking editorships), thus highlighting the relative positions of journals with similar or distinct patterns of board membership and the positions of scholars linked by common participation in various editorial boards. We interpret this participation as a form of ‘position-taking’ in Bourdieu’s sense, reflecting the adjustment of boards’ composition to meet the recent demands of the journals’ accreditation system.
AkbaritabarATraagVACaimoA, et al. (2020) Italian sociologists: A community of disconnected groups. Scientometrics124: 2361–2382.
2.
AndrikopoulosAEconomouL (2015) Editorial board interlocks in financial economics. International Review of Financial Analysis37: 51–62.
3.
BacciniABarabesiL (2010) Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals. Scientometrics82(2): 365–389.
4.
BacciniABarabesiLKhelfaouiM, et al. (2020) Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies1(1): 277–289.
5.
BellottiEKroneggerLGuadalupiL (2016) The evolution of research collaboration within and across disciplines in Italian Academia. Scientometrics109(2): 783–811.
6.
BorgattiSPEverettMG (1992) Regular blockmodels of multiway, multimode matrices. Social Networks14(1–2): 91–120.
7.
BotteroWCrossleyN (2011) Worlds, fields and networks. Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology5(1): 99–119.
8.
BourdieuP (1983) The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics12(4–5): 311–356.
9.
BourdieuP (1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
11.
BourdieuP (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
BourdieuPWacquantLD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
13.
BreigerRL (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces53(2): 181–190.
14.
BühlmannFBenzPMachA, et al. (2017) Mapping the power of law professors: The role of scientific and social capital. Minerva55(4): 509–531.
15.
BurgessTFShawNE (2010) Editorial board membership of management and business journals: A social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. British Journal of Management21(3): 627–648.
16.
BurtRS (1976) Positions in networks. Social Forces55: 93–122.
17.
BurtRS (1978) A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates. Social Networks1(4): 415–435.
18.
CraneD (1969) Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the ‘invisible college’ hypothesis. American Sociological Review34(3): 335–352.
19.
CraneD (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
CugmasMFerligojAKroneggerL (2020) Scientific co-authorship networks. In: DoreianPBatageljVFerligojA (eds) Advances in Network Clustering and Blockmodeling. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 363–387.
21.
D’AmbrosioDSerinoMRagoziniG (2021) Studying affiliation networks through cluster CA and blockmodeling. In: BalzanoSPorzioGCSalvatoreR, et al. (eds) Statistical Learning and Modeling in Data Analysis. Methods and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 57–68.
22.
De NooyW (2003) Fields and networks. Correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory. Poetics31: 305–327.
23.
De StefanoDGiordanoGVitaleMP (2011) Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks. Quality & Quantity45(5): 1091–1107.
24.
D’EspositoMRDe StefanoDRagoziniG (2014) On the use of multiple correspondence analysis to visually explore affiliation networks. Social Networks38: 28–40.
25.
DoreianPBatageljVFerligojA (2005) Generalized Blockmodeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
EvansTSLambiotteRPanzarasaP (2011) Community structure and patterns of scientific collaboration in business and management. Scientometrics89(1): 381–396.
27.
FaustK (1997) Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks19(2): 157–191.
28.
FieldSFrankKASchillerK, et al. (2006) Identifying positions from affiliation networks. Preserving the duality of people and events. Social Networks28(2): 97–123.
29.
FriedkinNE (1978) University social structure and social networks among scientists. American Journal of Sociology83(6): 1444–1465.
30.
GmürM (2003) Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics57(1): 27–57.
31.
GoyanesMDe-MarcosLDemeterM, et al. (2022) Editorial board interlocking across the social sciences: Modelling the geographic, gender, and institutional representation within and between six academic fields. PLoS One17(9): e0273552.
32.
GreenacreMJ (1984) Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.
33.
Grothe-HammerMKohlS (2020) The decline of organizational sociology? An empirical analysis of research trends in leading journals across half a century. Current Sociology68(4): 419–442.
34.
HummonNPDoreianP (1989) Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks11: 39–63.
35.
LazegaEJourdaMTMounierL, et al. (2008) Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks30(2): 159–176.
36.
LeydesdorffLParkHWWagnerC (2014) International co-authorship relations in the social science citation index: Is internationalization leading the network?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology65(10): 2111–2126.
37.
LievrouwLARogersEMLoweCU, et al. (1987) Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks9(3): 217–248.
38.
LorrainFWhiteHC (1971) Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology1: 49–80.
39.
MacQueenJ (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: CamLNeymanJ (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.Volume I. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 281–297.
40.
MarkosAIodice D’EnzaAVan de VeldenM (2019) Beyond tandem analysis: Joint dimension reduction and clustering in R. Journal of Statistical Software91(10): 1–24.
41.
MertonRK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
MizruchiMS (1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology22(1): 271–298.
43.
MoodyJ (2004) The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review69(2): 213–238.
44.
Mosbah-NatansonSGingrasY (2014) The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009). Current Sociology62(5): 626–646.
45.
NewmanME (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences98(2): 404–409.
46.
PriceDJ de S (1965) Networks of scientific papers. Science149(3683): 510–515.
47.
SailerLD (1978) Structural equivalence. Meaning and definition, computation and application. Social Networks1: 73–90.
48.
SerinoMD’AmbrosioDRagoziniG (2017) Bridging social network analysis and field theory through multidimensional data analysis: The case of the theatrical field. Poetics62: 66–80.
49.
SmallHGriffithBC (1974) The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies4(1): 17–40.
50.
SullivanDWhiteDHBarboniEJ (1977) Co-citation analyses of science: An evaluation. Social Studies of Science7(2): 223–240.
51.
Van de VeldenMIodice D’EnzaAPalumboF (2017) Cluster Correspondence Analysis. Psychometrika82(1): 158–185.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
WhiteHCBoormanSABreigerRL (1976) Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology81(4): 730–780.
55.
WillisCLMcNameeSJ (1990) Social networks of science and patterns of publication in leading sociology journals, 1960 to 1985. Knowledge11(4): 363–381.
