Governing and societal media for building resilience: A sociocybernetic study of the disaster recovery in Japan

Abstract

Spanish

French

How can society deal with a severe disaster that entails wide-ranging societal problems? This article aims to elaborate a sociocybernetic approach to describe and improve collective efforts which are tackling such problems. First, a concept of ‘governing’ will be introduced to describe efforts of not only public actors but also private actors. A case study of recovery efforts which were made in response to the large-scale disasters in 1995 and 2011 in Japan shows that governing can and needs to be empowered by the media. Focusing on one disaster-hit area in Japan, this article examines in what way and to what extent the media (the mass media and the Internet) supported local non-profit organizations (NPOs) working for their communities. The supportive use of the media will be defined as ‘societal media’. Making use of these key terms (governing and societal media), this article concludes that combining a variety of efforts with the supportive use of media is an essential component of building resilience in contemporary society.

Keywords

Disaster recovery governing Japan resilience societal media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich

(2012) Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Ali

(2016) Governing Disasters: Engaging Local Populations in Humanitarian Relief. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Avenell

(2012) From Kōbe to Tōhoku: The potential and the peril of a volunteer infrastructure. In: Kingston

(ed.) Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan’s 3/11. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 53–77.

Buchinger

(2007) Applying Luhmann to conceptualize public governance of autopoietic organizations. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 4(2–3): 173–187.

Cabinet Office (2018) Heisei 29 nendo tokutei hieiri katsudō hōjin jittai chōsa [The FY2017 specified non-profit corporation survey]. Available at: www.npo-homepage.go.jp/uploads/h29_houjin_houkoku.pdf (accessed 28 August 2018).

Cavallo

Ireland

(2014) Preparing for complex interdependent risks: A system of systems approach to building disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 9: 181–193.

Dunsire

(1996) Tipping the balance: Autopoiesis and governance. Administration and Society 28(3): 299–334.

Fire and Disaster Management Agency (2015) Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai Kakutei-hō [The final report of the Hanshin-Awaji Great Earthquake]. Available at: www.fdma.go.jp/bn/1995/detail/941.html (accessed 22 March 2018).

Fire and Disaster Management Agency (2018) Heisei 23 nen Tōhoku-chihō Taiheiyō-oki jishin (Higashi Nihon Daishinsai) ni tsuite dai 157 hō [The 157th report of the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011]. Available at: www.fdma.go.jp/bn/higaihou/pdf/jishin/157.pdf (accessed 22 March 2018).

10.

FMYY (2018) History of Radio FMYY. Available at: tcc117.jp/fmyy/english/history-english/ (accessed 17 April 2018).

11.

Fukushima

(2014) Post-disaster recovery and the cultural dimension of human security. In: Bacon

Hobson

(eds) Human Security and Japan’s Triple Disaster: Responding to the 2011 Earthquake, Tsunami and Fukushima Nuclear Crisis. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 141–159.

12.

Fukushima Medical University (2013) Radiation Disaster Medical Center. Available at: www.fmu-rdmc.jp/en/rule.html (accessed 22 March 2018).

13.

Gamson

(2004) Bystanders, public opinion and the media. In: Snow

Soule

Kriesi

(eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 242–261.

14.

Gamson

Wolfsfeld

(1993) Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 114–125.

15.

Gibson

(2007) Sociocybernetics. In: Bevir

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Governance, Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 897–901.

16.

Graf

(2016) Buddhist responses to the 3.11 disasters in Japan. In: Mullins

Nakano

(eds) Disasters and Social Crisis in Contemporary Japan: Political, Religious, and Sociocultural Responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 156–184.

17.

Honma

Deguchi

(eds) (1996) Borantia Gannen: Daishinsai de no keiken o shimin katsudou he [The first year of volunteering: The experience of the Great Earthquake and civic activities]. Tokyo: Toyokeizaishimposha.

18.

(2016) The role of legal services after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami. In: Kaneko

Matsuoka

Toyoda

(eds) Asian Law in Disasters: Toward a Human-centered Recovery. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 223–233.

19.

in’t Veld

Termeer

CJAM

Schaap

Van Twist

MJW

(eds) (1991) Autopoiesis and Configuration Theory: New Approaches to Societal Steering. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

20.

International Sociological Association (2018) XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology. Available at: www.isa-sociology.org/en/conferences/world-congress/yokohama-2014/ (accessed 22 March 2018).

21.

Japan Sociological Society (2018) International Journal of Japanese Sociology. Available at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14756781 (accessed 22 March 2018).

22.

Japan Times (2012) Crowd funding breathes new life into art. 28 March, p. 3.

23.

Kahoku Shimpo (2013) Saisei ni idomu: Tōhoku hisai kigyō no huntō [Striving for reconstruction: Struggles of damaged companies in Tōhoku]. 16 February.

24.

Kanayama

(2012) Community radio and the Tōhoku earthquake. International Journal of Japanese Sociology 21(1): 30–36.

25.

Kawato

Pekkanen

Tsujinaka

(2012) Civil society and the triple disasters: Revealed strengths and weaknesses. In: Kingston

(ed.) Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan’s 3/11. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 78–93.

26.

Kooiman

(2003) Governing as Governance. London: Sage.

27.

Lindell

(2013) Disaster studies. Current Sociology 61(5–6): 797–825.

28.

Lindell

Prater

(2003) Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Natural Hazards Review 4(4): 176–185.

29.

Lindell

Prater

Perry

(2006) Introduction to Emergency Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

30.

Little

(2001) Autopoiesis and governance: Societal steering and control in democratic societies. In: Geyer

van der Zouwen

(eds) Sociocybernetics: Complexity, Autopoiesis, and Observation of Social Systems. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 159–170.

31.

Lucini

(2014) Disaster Resilience from a Sociological Perspective: Exploring Three Italian Earthquakes as Models for Disaster Resilience Planning. Cham: Springer.

32.

Luhmann

(1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

33.

Mancilla

(2012) Introduction to sociocybernetics (Part 2): Power, culture and institutions. Journal of Sociocybernetics 10(1/2): 45–71.

34.

Miyagi University of Education (2018) Center for Disaster Education and Recovery Assistance. Available at: fukkou.miyakyo-u.ac.jp/english/index.html (accessed 22 March 2018).

35.

Nakano

(2005) Community Volunteers in Japan: Everyday Stories of Social Change. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

36.

Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (9th edn) (2015) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

37.

Pekkanen

(2006) Japan’s Dual Civil Society: Members without Advocates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

38.

Pierre

(2000) Introduction: Understanding governance. In: Pierre

(ed.) Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–10.

39.

Ramalingam

Jones

Reba

Young

(2008) Exploring the Science of Complexity: Ideas and Implications for Development and Humanitarian Efforts, 2nd edn. London: Overseas Development Institute. Available at: www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/833.pdf (accessed 31 August 2018).

40.

Ranghieri

Ishiwatari

(eds) (2014) Learning from Megadisasters: Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake. Washington, DC: World Bank.

41.

Rhodes

RAW

(1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

42.

Rikuzentakata City (2018) Higai jōhō [Damage information]. Available at: www.city.rikuzentakata.iwate.jp/shinsai/oshirase/hazard1.pdf (accessed 22 March 2018).

43.

Scott

(2009) The role of sociocybernetics in understanding world futures. Kybernetes 38(6): 863–878.

44.

Slater

Kindstrand

Nishimura

(2016) Crisis and opportunity: Social media in Kobe, Tohoku, and Tokyo. In: Mullins

Nakano

(eds) Disasters and Social Crisis in Contemporary Japan: Political, Religious, and Sociocultural Responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–237.

45.

Slater

Nishimura

Kindstrand

(2012) Social media in disaster Japan. In: Kingston

(ed.) Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan’s 3/11. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 94–108.

46.

Takahashi

(2015) Political crisis and societal governance: How media can be ‘societal media’? Journal of Sociocybernetics 13(2): 84–92.

47.

Takezawa

(2008) The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and town-making towards multiculturalism. In: Graburn

NHH

Ertl

Tierney

(eds) Multiculturalism in the New Japan: Crossing the Boundaries Within. New York, NY: Berghahn Books, pp. 32–42.

48.

Taniyama

(2014) Chaplaincy work in disaster areas: Potential and challenges. In: Harding

Iwata

Yoshinaga

(eds) Religion and Psychotherapy in Modern Japan. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 250–266.

49.

Thygesen

(ed.) (2012) The Illusion of Management Control: A Systems Theoretical Approach to Managerial Technologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

50.

Tohoku University (2018) Tohoku University Reconstruction Action: Leading the Restoration of Tohoku and the Regeneration of Japan, Vol. 7. Available at: www.idrrr.tohoku.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/action7.pdf (accessed 22 March 2018).

51.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2015) Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015. Available at: www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/gar-pdf/GAR2015_EN.pdf (accessed 2 April 2018).

52.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2017) Terminology: resilience. Available at: www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology (accessed 2 April 2018).

53.

Volunteer Platform (2018) About. Available at: b.volunteer-platform.org/about (accessed 22 March 2018).

54.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1993) Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

55.

World Bank (2018) World Bank open data. Available at: data.worldbank.org/ (accessed 2 April 2018).

56.

Yomiuri Shimbun (2014) Kodomo āto de machi irodoru: Minamisōma shisestu no kabe nado nurikae [Children and art colored the town: Children repaint public facilities in Minamisōma]. Fukushima edition, 16 June, p. 32.