Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Like sustainable development, disaster resilience can be conceptualized as a collective surge in science, policy, and practice. The strength of the resilience surge is based on the concept’s usefulness as a boundary object and in particular its resonance with the discourses and practices of neoliberalization, in which the role of the state is diminished and superseded by private–public partnerships and contracts. Current U.S. resilience approaches support particular types of state–society relationships, construct particular kinds of at-risk subjects, and privilege technocratic solutions to disaster vulnerability. Neoliberal disaster risk reduction strategies and their outcomes had a profound impact on post-Katrina recovery in New Orleans.

Keywords

post-Katrina New Orleans disaster recovery disaster resilience neoliberalization resilience discourse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2012). The other road to serfdom: Recovery by the market and the affect economy in New Orleans. Public Culture, 24, 185-216.

Adams

(2013). Markets of sorrow, labors of faith: New Orleans in the wake of Katrina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Aguirre

B. E.

(2002a). Can sustainable development sustain us? International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 20, 111-126.

Aguirre

B. E.

(2002b). “Sustainable development” as collective surge. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 101-118.

Aldrich

D. P.

(2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Brand

F. S.

Jax

(2007). Focusing on the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23.

Bruneau

Chang

S. E.

Eguchi

R. T.

Lee

G. C.

O’Rourke

T. D.

Reinhorn

A. M.

. . .von Winterfeldt

(2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19, 733-752.

Buerger

Harris

(2015). How can decentralized systems solve system-level problems? An analysis of market-driven New Orleans school reforms. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(10), 1246-1262. doi:10.1177/0002764215591182

Cash

D. W.

Clark

W. C.

Alcock

Dickson

Eckley

Guston

D. H.

. . .Mitchell

R. B.

(2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8086-8091.

10.

Chandler

(2013). Resilience and the autotelic subject: Toward a critique of the societalization of security. International Political Sociology, 7, 210-226.

11.

Cutter

S. L.

Burton

C. G.

Emrich

C. T.

(2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7, 1-22.

12.

Duffield

(2011). Environmental terror: Uncertainty, resilience and the bunker (Working paper No. 06-11). Retrieved from http://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/spais/migrated/documents/duffield-0611.pdf

13.

Gavor

(2013, September 20). Post-Katrina, the great New Orleans charter tryout. Newsweek. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/2013/09/20/post-katrina-great-new-orleans-charter-tryout-237968.html

14.

Gotham

K. F.

(2012). Disaster, inc.: Privatization and post-Katrina rebuilding in New Orleans. Perspectives on Politics, 10, 633-646.

15.

Gotham

K. F.

(2015). Limitations, legacies, and lessons: Post-Katrina rebuilding in retrospect and prospect. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(10), 1314-1326. doi:10.1177/0002764215591186

16.

Gunderson

L. H.

Holling

C. S.

(2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

17.

Hobor

(2015). New Orleans’ remarkably (un)predictable recovery: Developing a theory of urban resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(10), 1214-1230. doi:10.1177/0002764215591180

18.

Jessop

(1994). Post-Fordism and the state. In Amin

(Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 251-279). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

19.

Jessop

(2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452-472.

20.

Kendra

J. M.

Wachtendorf

(2003). Elements of community resilience in the World Trade Center attack. Disasters, 27, 37-53.

21.

Kendra

J. M.

Wachtendorf

Quarantelli

E. L.

(2002, September-October). Who was in charge of the massive evacuation of lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11? No one was, yet it was an extremely successful operation. Implications? Securitas, 1(5).

22.

Klein

R. J. T.

Nicholls

R. J.

Thomella

(2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5, 35-45.

23.

Mileti

(1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

24.

Nakagawa

Shaw

(2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22, 5-34.

25.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015). Draft community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure. Retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/el/building_materials/resilience/draft-community-resilience-guide.cfm

26.

National Public Radio. (2014, September 2). The end of neighborhood schools. National Public Radio. Retrieved from http://apps.npr.org/the-end-of-neighborhood-schools/

27.

National Research Council. (2011). Building community disaster resilience through private-public collaboration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

28.

Nelson

S. H.

(2014). Resilience and the neoliberal counter-revolution: From ecologies of control to production of the common. Resilience, 2, 1-17.

29.

NOLA. (2015). Chief resilience officer. Retrieved from http://www.nola.gov/resilience/chief-resilience-officer/

30.

Norris

Stevens

S. P.

Pfefferbaum

Wyche

K. F.

Pfefferbaum

R. L.

(2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150.

31.

Peck

(2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

32.

Peck

Tickell

(2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34, 380-404.

33.

Reid

(2013). Interrogating the neoliberal biopolitics of the sustainable development-resilience nexus. International Political Sociology, 7, 353-367.

34.

Ritchie

Gill

(2011). The role of community capitals in disaster recovery. Report for an online symposium sponsored by the Public Entity Research Institute.

35.

Rodin

(2014). The resilience dividend: Being strong in a world where things go wrong. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.

36.

Smith

(1997). A synthetic framework and a heuristic for integrating multiple perspectives on sustainability. In Smith

(Ed.), Environmental sustainability: Practical global implications (pp 1-26). Boca Raton, FLA: St. Lucie Press (now CRC Press).

37.

Sparks

S. D.

(2010, August 24). Few studies track post-Katrina school changes. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/08/25/01research.h30.html

38.

Star

S. L.

Griesemer

J. R.

(1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations,’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.

39.

Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction. 2005. Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduction. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy.

40.

Tierney

(2014). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

41.

Walker

Cooper

(2011). Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42, 143-160.

42.

Welsh

(2014). Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. Geographical Journal, 180, 15-26.

43.

Wisner

Blaikie

Cannon

Davis

(2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.

Resilience and the Neoliberal Project

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References