This article analyses the stark contrast between the revolutionary shift in LGBT rights and the maternalistic shadow still cast over childcare-related family policies in Argentina. It analyses family law and recent developments in the recognition of women and the LGBT population as equal rights holders in the realm of the family. Then it examines family policies aimed at working parents with childcare responsibilities, exploring whether or not the enactment of the Egalitarian Marriage Act shifted the consideration of working mothers and fathers’ rights and obligations regarding childcare. Finally, it discusses the challenges in implementing policies that can disentangle the gender and social inequalities embedded in them. The author argues that different logics are found in different family regulations. Family laws introduced gender neutral language and equal parental responsibilities, but family policies still distinguish rights and responsibilities according to gender even after the postpartum period. These not only misrecognize the LGBT population, but they also reaffirm maternalistic assumptions that do not reflect the new family dynamic and recent legal advances. In addition, in the most unequal region of the world, reinforce a system of socioeconomic and gender inequalities.
BacinGGemetroF (2015) Reconocimiento igualitario de niños y niñas de familias comaternales. In: Dossier. Sistema argentino de información jurídica. Buenos Aires: INFOJUS, pp. 71–79.
2.
BarrancosD (2007) Mujeres en la sociedad argentina: una historia de cinco siglos. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
3.
BarrancosD (2017) Feminismos y agencias de las sexualidades disidentes. In: FaurE (ed.) Mujeres y varones en la Argentina de hoy. Géneros en movimiento. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
4.
BlofieldMMartínez FranzoniJ (2014) Maternalism, co-responsibility and social equity: A typology of work–family policies. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society22(1): 38–59. Available at: academic.oup.com/sp/article/22/1/38/1734581 (accessed 16 August 2017).
5.
ConnellRW (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
CreightonC (1999) The rise and decline of the ‘male breadwinner family’ in Britain. Cambridge Journal of Economics Special Issue on the Family 23(5).
7.
CromptonR (1999) The decline of the male breadwinner: Explanations and interpretations. In: CromptonR (ed.) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Díaz LangouGFloritoJ (2017) ¿Cómo promover un cambio en el régimen de licencias por maternidad, paternidad y familiares? Lecciones aprendidas del análisis de casos provinciales, Available at: www.cippec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1071.pdf (accessed 15 August 2017).
9.
EsquivelV (2011) La economía del cuidado en América latina. Poniendo a los cuidados en el centro de la agenda. Panamá: PNUD
10.
EsquivelVFaurE (2012) Beyond maternalism? The political and social organization of childcare in Argentina. In: RazaviSStaabS (eds) Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care. Worlds Apart. Routledge/UNRISD Research in Gender and Development. New York and London: Routledge/UNRISD, pp. 103–121.
11.
FaurE (2006) Gender and family–work reconciliation: Labour legislation and male subjectivities in Latin America. In: MoraLMorenoMJ (eds) Social Cohesion, Reconciliation Policies and Public Budgeting: A Gender Approach. Mexico City: United Nations Population Fund-GTZ, pp. 127–150.
12.
FaurE (2011) A widening gap? The political and social organization of childcare in Argentina. Development and Change42(4): 967–994.
13.
FaurE (2014) El cuidado infantil en el siglo XXI. Mujeres malabaristas en una sociedad desigual. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
14.
FigariC (2014) Queer Argie. American Quarterly66(3): 621–631.
15.
FolbreN (1994) Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London and New York: Routledge.
16.
FolbreN (2001) The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: The New Press.
17.
FraserN (1997a) Iustitia Interrupta. Reflexiones críticas desde la posición ‘post-socialista’. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
18.
FraserN (1997b) Heterosexism, misrecognition, and capitalism: A response to Judith Butler. Social Text52–3 (Fall/Winter): 279–289.
19.
HerreraMde la TorreNSilvaSA (forthcoming) Impacto de las relaciones de familia del Código Civil y Comercial en el Derecho del Trabajo. In: OjedaRH (ed.) Tratado práctico de Derecho del Trabajo (Title II Relaciones Individuales del Trabajo). Buenos Aires: Editorial Errejus.
20.
HtunMWeldonL (2017) States and gender justice. In: MorganKJOrloffAS (eds) Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
INADI (2015) Hacia una redistribución igualitaria de las tareas de cuidado. Buenos Aires: INADI, Secretaría de Derechos Humanos.
22.
JelinE (2010) Pan y afectos. La transformación de las familias. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
23.
JelinE (2017) Familia. Un modelo para desarmar. In: FaurE (ed.) Mujeres y varones en la Argentina de hoy. Géneros en movimiento. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
24.
LayaA (2014) El Derecho al Cuidado en los Convenios Colectivos de Trabajo del Sector Privado. Análisis comparativo de Convenios Colectivos en las ramas de actividades con mayor índice de feminización del sector privado. Buenos Aires: ADC-CIEPP-ELA.
25.
LindAShareJ (2003) Queering development: Institutionalized heterosexuality in development theory, practice and politics in Latin America. In: BhavnaniKKForanJKurianPA (eds) Feminist Futures: Re-imagining Women, Culture and Development. London: Zed Books, pp. 55–73.
26.
MorganKJOrloffAS (2017) Introduction: The many hands of the state. In: MorganKJOrloffAS (eds) Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
NariM (2004) Políticas de maternidad y maternalismo político. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
28.
PechenyMde la DehesaR (2010) Sexualidades y políticas en América Latina: el matrimonio igualitario en contexto. In: CléricoLAldaoM (eds) Matrimonio igualitario en Argentina. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA, pp. 7–58.
29.
RazaviSStaabS (eds) (2012) Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care. New York: Routledge/UNRISD.
30.
RicoNRoblesC (2016) Políticas de cuidado en América Latina. Forjando la igualdad. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-Cooperación Alemana.
31.
SainsburyD (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SainsburyD (1999) Gender and social-democratic welfare status. In: SainsburyD (ed.) Gender and Welfare State Regimes. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
ThévenonO (2011) Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review37(1): 57–87.
34.
TrontoJC (2015) Who Cares? How to Reshape a Democratic Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
UNDP (2014) Género en el trabajo. Brechas en el acceso a puestos de decisión, Aportes para el desarrollo humano en Argentina, 8. Buenos Aires: PNUD.
36.
WainermanC (2003) Familia y trabajo. La reestructuración de las fronteras de género. In: WainermanC (ed.) Familia, trabajo y género. Un mundo de nuevas relaciones. Buenos Aires: UNICEF-Fondo de Cultura Económica.
