This article examines the gender equality component of Prospera, a conditional cash transfer program in Mexico that provides cash contingent on three nodes of civic engagement: health, nutrition, and education. This article draws on ethnographic research in La Gloria, a settlement of indigenous Mayan refugees from Guatemala in the Mexican state of Chiapas. The article identifies the Prospera program’s neoliberal features, the impact its gender equality measures have in the lives of women, their families, and in the political structure of the community of La Gloria. The findings reveal how Prospera reinforces gender and racial hierarchy, and fosters community divisions that undercut efforts to promote community autonomy, which raises questions about the ability of conditional cash transfers to promote development and gender equality in indigenous communities in Mexico.
AdatoMCoadyDRuelM (2000) An Operations Evaluation of PROGRESA from the Perspective of Beneficiaries, Promotras, School Directors, and Health Staff. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
2.
BandoRGLopez-CalvaLFPatrinosHA (2005) Child labor, school attendance, and indigenous households: Evidence from Mexico. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC.
3.
BehrmanJRParkerSWToddPE (2011) Do conditional cash transfers for schooling generate lasting benefits? A five-year followup of PROGRESA/Oportunidades. The Journal of Human Resources46(1): 93–122.
4.
BlackwellM (2012) The practice of autonomy in the age of neoliberalism: Strategies from indigenous women’s organising in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies44(04): 703–732.
5.
Borja-VegaCLundeTGarcía MorenoV (2007) Economic Opportunities for Indigenous Peoples in Latin America. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
6.
BrownW (2003) Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory and Event7(1).
7.
BrownerC (1986) Gender roles and social change: A Mexican case study. Ethnology25(2): 89–106.
8.
CancianF (1967) Political and religious organizations. In: WauchopeRNashM (eds) Social Anthropology. Volume 6: Handbook of Middle American Indians. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9.
CastañedaTAldez-CarrollE (1999) The Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty: Some Causes and Policy Implications. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
10.
CastlesS (2003) Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology37(1): 13–34.
11.
CohenEFrancoR (eds) (2006) Transferencias con corresponsabilidad: Una mirada latinoamericana. San Jose, Costa Rica: FLACSO.
12.
CorbozJ (2013) Third-way neoliberalism and conditional cash transfers: The paradoxes of empowerment, participation and self-help among poor Uruguayan women. The Australian Journal of Anthropology24(1): 64–80.
13.
DeWaltBR (1975) Changes in the cargo systems of Mesoamerica. Anthropological Quarterly48(2): 87–105.
14.
DurandJMasseyDSZentenoRM (2001) Mexican immigration to the United States: Continuities and changes. Latin American Research Review36(1): 107–127.
15.
EscobarA (2010) Latin America at the crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development?Cultural Studies24(1): 1–65.
16.
EZLN (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional) (2014) Resistencia autónoma. Cuaderno de texto de primer grado del curso de ‘La Libertad segun l@s Zapatistas’. Caracol II.
17.
FiszbeinASchadyN (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
FoucaultM (1988) The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
20.
FoxJ (2007) Rural democratization and decentralization at the state/society interface: What counts as ‘local’ government in the Mexican countryside?The Journal of Peasant Studies34(3-4): 527–559.
21.
GarcíaMC (2006) Seeking Refuge: Central American Migration to Mexico, the United States, and Canada. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
García FalconiSC (2004) Las representaciones sociales en torno al Progresa/Oportunidades en Santiago Mexquititlán, Amealco, Querétaro. PhD, Universidad de Guadalajara.
23.
GiddensA (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
24.
GiugaleMMLafourcadeONguyenVH (eds) (2001) Mexico: A Comprehensive Development Agenda for the New Era. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
25.
GledhillJ (2001) Disappearing the poor?: A critique of the new wisdoms of social democracy in an age of globalization. In: EdelmanMHaugerudA (eds) The Anthropology of Development and Globalization: From Classical Political Economy to Contemporary Neoliberalism. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 382–390.
26.
González de la RochaMParedes BañuelosPSánchez LópezG (2008) External evaluation of Oportunidades 2008. 1997–2007: 10 Years of Intervention in Rural Areas. México, DF: Secretaría de Desarrollo Social.
27.
González MontesSMojarroM (2012) Género y alivio a la pobreza en México: el caso de la salud y los derechos reproductivos de las mujeres en regiones indígenas. In: OrtaleMMRosasS (eds) Política social en América Latina y género: Configuraciones/reconfiguraciones en la participación de las mujeres. México: Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores del Occidente.
28.
GreenhalghSWincklerEA (2005) Governing China’s Population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
HaleC (1996) Mestizaje, hybridity, and the cultural politics of difference in post-revolutionary Central America. Journal of Latin American Anthropology2(1): 34–61.
30.
HaleCR (2005) Neoliberal multiculturalism: The remaking of cultural rights and racial dominance in Central America. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review28(1): 10–28.
31.
HernándezAR (2002) Indigenous law and identity politics in Mexico: Indigenous men’s and women’s struggles for a multicultural nation. Political and Legal Anthropology Review25(1): 90–109.
32.
KleinN (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books.
33.
Largaespada FredersdorffC (2006) Nicaragua: Red de protección social y sistema de atención a crisis. In: CohenEFrancoR (eds) Transferencias con corresponsabilidad: Una mirada Latinoamericana. San Jose, Cosa Rica: FLACSO.
34.
LindA (2003) Gender and neoliberal states: Feminists remake the nation in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives30(1): 181–207.
35.
LomelíEV (2008) Conditional cash transfers as social policy in Latin America: An assessment of their contributions and limitations. Annual Review of Sociology34: 475–498.
36.
MallonF (1996) Constructing mestizaje in Latin America: Authenticity, marginality, and gender in the claiming of national identities. Journal of Latin American Anthropology2(1): 170–181.
37.
ManagoAMGreenfieldPM (2011) The construction of independent values among Maya women at the forefront of social change: Four case studies. Ethos39(1): 1–29.
38.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39.
MolyneuxM (2006) Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme. Social Policy and Administration40(4): 425–449.
40.
MolyneuxM (2008a) Conditional Cash Transfers: A ‘Pathway to Women’s Empowerment’?Brighton: Pathways to Women’s Empowerment, Institute of Development Studies.
41.
MolyneuxM (2008b) The ‘neoliberal turn’ and the new social policy in Latin America: How neoliberal, how new?Development and Change39(5): 775–797.
42.
MoraM (2008) Decolonizing politics: Zapatista indigenous autonomy in an era of neoliberal governance and low intensity warfare. PhD, University of Texas at Austin.
43.
MorleySCoadyD (2003) From Social Assistance to Social Development: Targeted Education Subsidies in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics and International Food Policy Research Institute.
44.
NelsonDM (1999) A Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
OngA (2006) Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46.
PastorM (1987) The effects of IMF programs in the third-world: Debate and evidence from Latin America. World Development15(2): 249–262.
47.
PastorMJ (1989) Latin America, the debt crisis, and the International Monetary Fund. Latin American Perspectives16(1): 79–110.
48.
PastorMWiseC (2004) Picking up the pieces: Comparing the impact of financial crisis in Mexico and Argentina. In: Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
49.
PeckJTheodoreN (2010) Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: Transnationalizing ‘fast’ social policy. Geoforum41(2): 195–208.
50.
PessarPR (2001) Women’s political consciousness and empowerment in local, national, and transnational contexts: Guatemalan refugees and returnees. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power7(4): 461–500.
51.
RamírezA (2006) Mexico. In: HallGPatrinosHA (eds) Indigenous Peoples, Poverty and Human Development in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
Ruíz LagierV (2007) Ser Mexicano en Chiapas: Identidad y ciudadanización entre los refugiados Guatemaltecos en La Trinitaria, Chiapas. PhD, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.
53.
RusJ (2009) La nueva ciudad Maya en el Valle de Jovel: Urbanización rápida, comunidad, y juventud Maya en San Cristóbal de Las Casas. In: SaavedraMAE (ed.) Chiapas después de la tormenta. Estudios sobre economía, sociedad y política. México, DF: Colegio de México/ COCOPA/Cámara de Diputados.
54.
Saldaña-PortilloMJ (2005) In the shadow of NAFTA: Y tu mamá también revisits the national allegory of mexican sovereignty. American Quarterly57(3): 751–777.
55.
SchildV (2000) ‘Gender equity’ without social justice: Women’s rights in the neoliberal age. NACLA Report on the Americas34(1): 25–28.
56.
SchlesingerSKinzerSCoatsworthJHNuccioRA (eds) (2006) Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
SchultzTP (2004) School subsidies for the poor: Evaluating the Mexican Progresa poverty program. Journal of Development Economics74(1): 199–250.
58.
SkoufiasEMcClaffertyB (2001) Is Progresa Working? Summary of the Results of an Evaluation by IFPRI. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
59.
SmithA (2003) Not an Indian tradition: The sexual colonization of native peoples. Hypatia18(2): 70–85.
60.
SmithA (2010) Queer Theory and native studies: The heteronormativity of settler colonialism. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies16(1-2): 41–68.
61.
SmithC (ed.) (1990) Guatemalan Indians and the State, 1540–1988. Austin: University of Texas.
62.
Smith-OkaV (2009) Unintended consequences: Exploring the tensions between development programs and indigenous women in Mexico in the context of reproductive health. Social Science and Medicine68(11): 2069–2077.
63.
Smith-OkaV (2013) Shaping the Motherhood of Indigenous Mexico. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
64.
SpeedSCollierJF (2000) Limiting indigenous autonomy in Chiapas, Mexico: The state government’s use of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly22(4): 877–905.
65.
StavenhagenR (2004) Indigenous peoples in comparative perspective: Problems and policies. Occasional Paper, United Nations Development Program.
66.
StecklovGWintersPStampiniMDavisB (2005) Do conditional cash transfers influence migration? A study using experimental data from the Mexican PROGRESA program. Population Association of America.
67.
TaylorMJMoran-TaylorMJRuizDR (2006) Land, ethnic, and gender change: Transnational migration and its effects on Guatemalan lives and landscapes. Geoforum37(1): 41–61.
68.
TetreaultDV (2010) Alternative pathways out of rural poverty in Mexico. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe/European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies88: 77–94.
69.
US Committee for Refugees (1993) El Retorno: Guatemala’s Risky Repatriation Begins. Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees.
70.
VillarrealA (2014) Ethnic identification and its consequences for measuring inequality in Mexico. American Sociological Review79(4): 775–806.
71.
VillatoroP (2005) Los programas de protección social asistencial en América Latina y sus impactos en las familias: algunas reflexiones. In: Políticas hacia las familias, protección e inclusión sociales, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Santiago, Chile, 28– 29June2005.
72.
WolfER (1957) Closed corporate communities in Mesoamerica and Java. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology13(1): 1–18.
73.
World Bank (2001) World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
74.
World Bank (2009) Evaluación social y plan de acción para la definición del modelo alternativo de la operación y gestión del Programa Oportunidades para población indígena. Washington, DC: World Bank.
75.
YaschineI (1999) The changing anti-poverty agenda. What can the Mexican case tell us?IDS Bulletin30(2): 47–60.
76.
ZavaladeCosioME (1992) Cambios de fecundidad en México y políticas de población. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
