This article looks at the construction and performance of gendered identity through a sub-section of Facebook web pages belonging to the Slut Walk movement. The authors’ analysis suggests that gender is constructed through the subjects’ participation in the ‘post-feminist masquerade’ through which their gendered identity is defined in relation to a hegemonic masculine ideal. This situates the web pages within a space characterized through the ambivalent and appropriative treatment of feminism and further, coiled within an acute tension between feminist and post-feminist discourses. Acts of resistance are framed as individual, momentary ruptures of Judith Butler’s heterosexual matrix of ‘cultural intelligibility’. The online context of these ruptures is found to vest a creative potential, by removing the constraints of time and location, indicating that the impact of these ruptures may extend beyond its immediate environment.
BakardjievaM (2008) Bulgarian online forums as carnival: Popular political forms and new media. In: SudweeksFEssC (eds) Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology. Melbourne: Murdoch, pp. 286–300.
2.
Bechar-IsraeliH (1995) From <Bonehead> to <cLoNehEAd>: Nicknames, play, and identity on internet relay chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication1(2).
3.
BornsteinK (1998) My Gender Workbook. New York: Routledge.
4.
boydDEllisonNB (2008) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 210–230.
5.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
6.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies That Matter. New York: Routledge.
7.
ButlerJ (2006) Responses to special issue: Troubling identities: Reflections on Judith Butler’s philosophy for the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education27(4): 529–534.
8.
ButlerJ (2013) For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion. Feminist Formations25(1): 35–58.
9.
ConnellRW (2005) Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CrenshawK (1994) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of colour. In: FinemanMAMykitiukR (eds) The Public Nature of Private Violence. New York: Routledge.
11.
DanetB (1998) Text as mask: Gender and identity on the internet. In: JonesSG (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
FaircloughN (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
13.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
14.
GoodK (2013) From scrapbook to Facebook: A history of personal media assemblage and archives. New Media and Society15(4): 557–573.
15.
HerringSC (1993) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication3(2).
16.
JurgensonN (2012) When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet4(1): 83–91.
17.
Knorr CetinaK (2009) The synthetic situation: Interactionism for a global world. Symbolic Interaction32(1): 61–87.
18.
KofoedJRingroseJ (2012) Travelling and sticky affects: Exploring teens and sexualized cyberbullying through a Butlerian-Deleuzian-Guattarian lens. Discourse: Study in the Cultural Politics of Education33(1): 5–20.
19.
LloydM (2007) Judith Butler: From Norms to Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
20.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
21.
MarwickAEboydD (2010) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society13(1): 114–133.
22.
MurthyD (2008) Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology42(5): 837–855.
23.
MurthyD (2012) Towards a sociological understanding of social media: Theorizing Twitter. Sociology46(6): 1059–1073.
24.
NiedererSVan DijckJ (2010) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media and Society12(8): 1368–1387.
25.
ReidE (1993) Electronic chat: Social issues on internet relay chat. Media Information Australia67(1): 62–70.
26.
RenoldERingroseJ (2008) Regulation and rupture: Mapping tween and teenage girls’ resistance to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory9(3): 313–338.
27.
RenoldERingroseJ (2012) Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualization’: Thinking through the politics of the international Slut Walks with teen girls. Gender and Education24(3): 333–343.
28.
RingroseJBarajasKE (2011) Gendered risks and opportunities? Exploring teen girls’ digitized sexual identities in post-feminist media contexts. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics7(2): 121–138.
29.
RodinoM (1997) Breaking out of binaries: Reconceptualizing gender and its relationship to language in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(3).
30.
SavageE (2011) Politics of Slut Walk. Eureka Street21(10): 29–30.
31.
SelfeCLMeyerPR (1991) Testing claims for online conferences. Written Communications8(2): 163–192.
32.
VitakJZubePSmockA. (2011) It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior and Social Networking14(3): 107–114.
33.
ZunigaHGJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
