Using data from the Minnesota sexual assault kit initiative (MN SAKI) project, we examined the predictors of victim notifications, processes, and the outcomes. Findings indicated cases selected for victim notification (n = 80; 19.8%) were more likely to involve victims who were non-White and not cooperative; suspects who were strangers, adults, and non-White; and SAKs with DNA evidence, but not CODIS hits. While most victims were located and notified (n = 69; 86.2%), few re-engaged (n = 8; 10%) and cases rarely resulted in prosecution (n = 2) or conviction (n = 1). Findings help build the evidence base regarding victim notification protocols. Downstream impacts of notification protocols on SAKI projects’ goals and victims’ needs and expectations are discussed.
AhrensC.DahlgrenS.HowardR. (2020). Rape kit notification: Recommendations and barriers to reconnecting with survivors. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 21(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.1770911
CampbellR.EngletonJ.GregoryK.Goodman-WilliamsR.JavorkaM. (2024). “It made me feel like someone wasn’t doing their job.” Sexual assault kit (SAKs) victim notifications and institutional betrayal by the criminal legal system. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 25(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2023.2231914
7.
CampbellR.FeeneyH. (2023). “On the shelves, covered in dust”: The history of untested sexual assault kits in the United States. In LovellR.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (Eds.), Sexual assault kits and reforming the response to rape (pp. 9–23). Routledge.
8.
CampbellR.GregoryK.Goodman-WilliamsEngletonJ.JavorkaM. (2023). Victim notification protocols for untested sexual assault kits: Survivors’ and advocates’ perspectives on law enforcement-led outreach methods. Violence Against Women, 29(15-16), 3101–3125. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231200479
9.
CampbellR.GregoryK.Goodman-Williams, EngletonJ.JavorkaM. (2024). Community-based advocacy in “cold case” sexual assault prosecutions: A qualitative exploration of survivors’ and advocates’ experiences. Qualitative Social Work, 23(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250231207344
10.
CampbellR.GregoryK.JavorkaM.EngletonJ.Goodman-WilliamsR.FishwickK. (2022). Evaluating a victim notification protocol for untested sexual assault kits (SAKs): How do survivors define justice years after an assault? [Final Research Report]. Office on Violence Against Women, 2018-SE-AX-0001.
11.
CampbellR.ShawJ.Fehler-CabralG. (2018). Evaluation of a victim-centered, trauma-informed victim notification protocol for untested sexual assault kits (SAKs). Violence Against Women, 24(4), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217699090
12.
DavisR. C.AuchterB.WellsW.CampT.HowleyS. (2020). The effects of legislation mandating DNA testing in sexual assault cases: Results in Texas. Violence Against Women, 26(5), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219838330
13.
DavisR. C.WellsW. (2019). DNA testing in sexual assault cases: When do the benefits outweigh the costs. Forensic Science International, 299(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.031
14.
FeeneyH.CampbellR.CainD. (2018). Do you wish to prosecute the person who assaulted you?: Untested sexual assault kits and victim notification of rape survivors assaulted as adolescents. Victims & Offenders, 13(5), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1426668
15.
FrohmannL. (1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/800530
16.
Hardeberg BachM.AhrensC.HowardR.DahlgrenS. (2022). Hope shattered: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of survivors’ experiences with untested rape kits. Violence Against Women, 28(15–16), 3886–3909. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221083335
17.
JavorkaM.CampbellR. (2024). Exploring survivors’ decisions to re-engage with the criminal legal system in cold case sexual assault investigations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 49(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843241304770
18.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.LathanE. M. C.StefurakT.DuncanJ. (2023). Transforming police response to sexual assault from the inside out: A case study of the Mobile, Alabama sexual assault kit promise initiative. In LovellR.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (Eds.), Sexual assault kits and reforming the response to rape (pp. 185–201). Routledge.
19.
LapseyD.S.Jr.McMahonK.M.CampbellB.A. (2025). Regional differences in police officer misperceptions: A quasi-experimental evaluation of sexual assault investigations training in Kentucky. Policing and Society, 35(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2024.2379960
20.
LovellR.LuminaisM.FlanneryD.J.BellR.KykerB. (2018). Describing the process and quantifying the outcomes of the Cuyahoga County sexual assault kit initiative. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.05.012
MeltonH.LathanE. C.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2023). Current victim notification procedures: Victim and process impacts across two SAKI sites. In LovellR.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (Eds.), Sexual assault kits and reforming the response to rape (pp. 143–164). Routledge.
23.
MourtgosS. M.AdamsI. T.NixJ.RichardsT. N. (2021). Mandatory sexual assault kit testing policies and reporting and arrest trends: A natural experiment. Justice Evaluation Journal, 4(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2021.1881410
RichardsT.N.NixJ.WrightE.BranscumC.CampbellB.A. (2025). The minnesota sexual assault kit initiative (SAKI): Lessons learned from a decade of SAKI evaluations. Justice Evaluation Journal, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2025.2517545
Sexual Assault Kit Initiative. (2025). SAKI home. Retrieved July 23, 2025, from https://www.sakitta.org/
29.
ShawJ.LeeH. (2019). Race and the criminal justice system response to sexual assault: A systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 64(1–2), 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12334
30.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2014). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault: Inside the criminal justice system. Lynne Rienner Publishers. ISBN 1-62637-413-9.
31.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2019). Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly, 36(3), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1429645
32.
SulleyC.WoodL.HeffronL. C.WestbrookL.LevyN.DondeS. D.Busch-ArmendarizN. (2021). “At least they’re workin’ on my case?” Victim notification in sexual assault “cold” cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 4360–4380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518789905
33.
SulleyC.BassettM.McCarty-HarrisY.SussweinM.Busch-ArmendarizN. (2023). The notification for victims of assault (NoVA): Innovating future practice through change. In LovellR.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (Eds.), Sexual assault kits and reforming the response to rape (pp. 327–345). Routledge.
34.
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). (2024, May). Framework for prosecutors to strengthen our national response to sexual assault & domestic violence involving adult victims. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/media/1352371/dl?inline
35.
WellsW.CampbellB. A.FranklinC. (2016). Unsubmitted sexual assault kits in Houston, TX: Case characteristics, forensic testing results, and the investigation of CODIS hits, final report. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, NCJ 249812. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/249812.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
