Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates how toxic online disinhibition influences cyberbullying through the mediating roles of belonging collapse and bystander complicity. Using a cross-sectional survey of 379 Chinese university students, we tested a sequential mediation model with structural equation modeling. Results indicate that higher levels of toxic disinhibition predict lower perceived belonging and greater passive bystander behavior, both of which are associated with increased cyberbullying perpetration. The findings highlight a psychological pathway from online disinhibition to harmful online behavior and underscore the importance of fostering digital belonging and bystander accountability in cyberbullying prevention. The study contributes to the understanding of complex psychological mechanisms within online aggression and offers implications for platform design and policy.

Keywords

toxic online disinhibition sense of belonging bystander behavior cyberbullying chain mediation model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aljasir

(2023). Effect of online civic intervention and online disinhibition on online hate speech among digital media users. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), Article e202344. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13478

Altes

T. K.

Muftugil-Yalcin

Slootman

(2023). Belonging in online synchronous classrooms: Experiences of minoritized students in Dutch Higher Education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100986

Audrezet

de Kerviler

Moulard

J. G.

(2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008

Baker

(2014). Cyberbullying and the bystander: What promotes or inhibits adolescent participation? University of Exeter.

Barlińska

Szuster

Winiewski

(2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51.

Baroncelli

Perkins

E. R.

Ciucci

Frick

P. J.

Patrick

C. J.

Sica

(2020). Triarchic model traits as predictors of bullying and cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), NP3242–NP3268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934448

Bastiaensens

Vandebosch

Poels

Van Cleemput

DeSmet

De Bourdeaudhuij

(2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Brody

Vangelisti

A. L.

(2016). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1068253

10.

Cha

Haddadi

Benevenuto

Gummadi

(2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 4(1), 10–17. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14033

11.

Chan

H. C. (Oliver)

Wong

D. S. W.

(2020). The overlap between cyberbullying perpetration and victimisation: Exploring the psychosocial characteristics of Hong Kong adolescents. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 30(3), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2020.1761436

12.

Chan

T. K. H.

Cheung

C. M. K.

Benbasat

Xiao

Lee

Z. W. Y.

(2023). Bystanders join in cyberbullying on social networking sites: The deindividuation and moral disengagement perspectives. Information Systems Research, 34(3), 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1161

13.

Chen

Lin

Chan

K. L.

(2024). The effectiveness of interventions on bullying and cyberbullying bystander: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241297362

14.

Cheung

C. M. K.

Wong

R. Y. M.

Chan

T. K. H.

(2020). Online disinhibition: Conceptualization, measurement, and implications for online deviant behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-08-2020-0509

15.

Clarke

R. V.

Cornish

D. B.

(1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147–184.

16.

Crick

N. R.

Dodge

(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74

17.

Deng

Liu

Shen

(2020). Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the General Belongingness Scale in college students. Chinese Journal of Mental Health, 34(9), 790–794.

18.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.

19.

Estévez

Cañas

Estévez

J. F.

Povedano

(2020). Continuity and overlap of roles in victims and aggressors of bullying and cyberbullying in adolescence: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207452

20.

Firdaniza

Ruchjana

B. N.

Chaerani

Radianti

(2021). Information diffusion model in twitter: A systematic literature review. Information, 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010013

21.

Fowler

Beneby

D. R.

Fuller

K. L.

(2022). Aggressive reality docuseries and cyberbullying: A partial test of Glaser’s differential identification theory. International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime, 5(3), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23734577.2022.2044110

22.

Fox

Tang

W. Y.

(2016). Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: Rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1290–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816635778

23.

Gavreliuc

Semenescu

(2021). Beyond the facade of generosity-Regional stereotypes within the same national culture influence prosocial behaviors. PLoS ONE, 16(5), Article e0250125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250125

24.

Gini

Albiero

Benelli

Altoè

(2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002

25.

Goldsmith

Brewer

(2015). Digital drift and the criminal interaction order. Theoretical Criminology, 19(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480614538645

26.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

27.

Hodges

E. V.

Perry

D. G.

(1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677

28.

Hollenbaugh

Everett

(2013). The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12008

29.

Holt

T. J.

Bossler

A. M.

(2008). Examining the applicability of lifestyle-routine activities theory for cybercrime victimization. Deviant Behavior, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701876577

30.

Xiong

(2024). The relationship between relative deprivation and cyberbullying in college students: The mediating effect of moral disengagement and moderating effect of moral identity. Psychological Development and Education, 40(3), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.03.05

31.

Huang

Sun

Wang

Zhou

(2023). The severity of cyberbullying affects bystander intervention among college students: The roles of feelings of responsibility and empathy. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 893–903. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S397770

32.

Jia

Jin

Zhang

(2022). How are bystanders involved in cyberbullying? A latent class analysis of the cyberbystander and their characteristics in different intervention stages. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), Article 16083.

33.

Jones

L. M.

Mitchell

K. J.

Turner

H. A.

(2015). Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2308–2320.

34.

Joshi

Lim

W. M.

Jagani

Kumar

(2023). Social media influencer marketing: Foundations, trends, and ways forward. Electronic Commerce Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09715-3

35.

Juvonen

Gross

E. F.

(2008). Extending the school grounds? — Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00324.x

36.

Khanolainen

Semenova

Magnuson

(2021). ‘Teachers see nothing’: Exploring students’ and teachers’ perspectives on school bullying with a new arts-based methodology. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1914140

37.

Knowles

M. L.

Haycock

Shaikh

(2015). Does Facebook magnify or mitigate threats to belonging? Social Psychology, 46(6), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000246

38.

Kowalski

R. M.

Giumetti

G. W.

Schroeder

A. N.

Lattanner

M. R.

(2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618

39.

Lapidot-Lefler

Barak

(2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 434–443.

40.

Lawnik

Krucińska

(2019, May 24–25). Social support and declared aggressive behaviour among young people [Latvia]. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Vol. III, pp. 230–239). https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol3.3723

41.

Wang

Martin-Moratinos

Bella-Fernández

Blasco-Fontecilla

(2024). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying in the digital age and its associated mental health problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(9), 2895–2908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-01951-6

42.

Machackova

Dedkova

Sevcikova

(2015). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 257–267.

43.

Machackova

Pfetsch

(2016). Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12274

44.

Madoglou

Dimitriou

(2014). Bullying in Cyprus: Perceptions regarding the pupils’ involvement. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 21(2), 113–1210.

45.

Maftei

Opariuc-Dan

Grigore

A. N.

(2024). Toxic sensation seeking? Psychological distress, cyberbullying, and the moderating effect of online disinhibition among adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12956

46.

Mahanta

Khatoniyar

(2019). Cyberbullying and its impact on mental health of adolescents. IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 1, 1–10.

47.

Martinez

(2024). Conceptualizing social media contingent self-esteem: Associations between echo chambers, contingent self-esteem, and problematic social media use. Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 18(3), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2024-3-2

48.

May

(2011). Self, belonging and social change. Sociology, 45(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511399624

49.

Midgett

Doumas

D. M.

(2019). The impact of a brief bullying bystander intervention on depressive symptoms. Journal of Counseling & Development, 97(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12267

50.

Navarro-Rodríguez

C. D.

Bauman

Vera Noriega

J. Á.

Lagarda Lagarda

A. E.

(2023). Psychometric properties of a cyberaggression measure in Mexican students. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010019

51.

Ngo

A. T.

Tran

A. Q.

Tran

B. X.

Nguyen

L. H.

Hoang

M. T.

Nguyen

T. H. T.

Doan

L. P.

G. T.

Nguyen

T. H.

H. T.

Latkin

C. A.

R. C. M.

C. S. H.

(2021). Cyberbullying among school adolescents in an urban setting of a developing country: Experience, coping strategies, and mediating effects of different support on psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661919. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661919

52.

Oksanen

Oksa

Savela

Kaakinen

Ellonen

(2020). Cyberbullying victimization at work: Social media identity bubble approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, Article 106363.

53.

Palmer

S. B.

Rutland

Cameron

(2015). The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12092

54.

Piccoli

Carnaghi

Grassi

Stragà

Bianchi

(2020). Cyberbullying through the lens of social influence: Predicting cyberbullying perpetration from perceived peer-norm, cyberspace regulations and ingroup processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.001

55.

Postmes

Spears

Lea

(1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006006

56.

Pozzoli

Gini

(2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9

57.

Pozzoli

Gini

Vieno

(2012). Individual and class moral disengagement in bullying among elementary school children. Aggressive Behavior, 38(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21442

58.

Runions

K. C.

(2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2

59.

Salmivalli

Lagerspetz

Björkqvist

Österman

Kaukiainen

(1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T

60.

Salmivalli

Voeten

Poskiparta

(2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090

61.

Sela-Shayovitz

Levy

Hasson

(2024). The role of self-control in cyberbullying bystander behavior. Social Sciences, 13(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010064

62.

Slonje

Smith

P. K.

Frisén

(2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32.

63.

Smith

P. K.

Mahdavi

Carvalho

Fisher

Russell

Tippett

(2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01961.x

64.

Stenseng

Belsky

Skalická

Wichstrøm

(2014). Preschool social exclusion, aggression, and cooperation: A longitudinal evaluation of the need-to-belong and the social-reconnection hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1637–1647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214554591

65.

Suler

(2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

66.

Tam

M. J.

Brown

C. S.

(2020). Early adolescents’ responses to witnessing gender-based harassment differ by their perceived school belonging and gender typicality. Sex Roles, 83(7–8), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01126-0

67.

Thornberg

Jungert

(2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483.

68.

Tokunaga

R. S.

(2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–286.

69.

Twenge

J. M.

Baumeister

R. F.

Tice

D. M.

Stucke

T. S.

(2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058

70.

Udris

(2014). Cyberbullying among high school students in Japan: Development and validation of the online disinhibition scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 253–261.

71.

Underwood

M. K.

Ehrenreich

S. E.

(2014). Bullying may be fueled by the desperate need to belong. Theory into Practice, 53(4), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947217

72.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5.

73.

Wachs

Wright

M. F.

(2018). Associations between bystanders and perpetrators of online hate: The moderating role of toxic online disinhibition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), Article 2030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092030

74.

Wachs

Wright

M. F.

Vazsonyi

A. T.

(2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2116

75.

Wang

Jiang

Zhou

Z. Y.

Fei

W. Y.

Wang

W. Y.

(2024). Online disinhibition and adolescent cyberbullying: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 156, Article 107352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107352

76.

Williams

K. D.

(2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641

77.

Wright

M. F.

(2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 662–674.

78.

Wright

M. F.

Wachs

(2020). Does empathy and toxic online disinhibition moderate the longitudinal association between witnessing and perpetrating homophobic cyberbullying? International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00042-6

79.

Xie

Zheng

Xiao

Liu

Shapka

J. D.

(2022). Examining the validity and reliability of the short form of cyberbullying and Cybervictimization (CAV) Scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(5), 1155–1153. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.05.029

80.

Yang

J. P.

Wang

Gao

Wang

X. C.

(2021). Deviant peer affiliation and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Online disinhibition and perceived social support as moderators. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, Article 106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106066

81.

You

(2023). The bystander effect: Why do witnesses refrain from acting in cyberbullying cases? OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/zrqp6

82.

Zhao

(2023). The causes and measures of online deviance. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 22, 415–420. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v22i.12491

The Invisible Catalyst: How Belonging Collapse and Bystander Complicity Mediate Toxic Disinhibition’s Path to Cyberbullying

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References