The goal of the present study was to evaluate the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as an explanation for bystanders’ intention to help cyberbullying victims among college students. Participants completed an online survey in which their intention, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control toward helping cyberbullying victims were assessed. In addition to these traditional TPB variables, empathy toward cyberbullying victims and anticipated regret from not helping victims were included in the model. Results showed that empathy and anticipated regret significantly predicted intention to help cyberbullying victims over and above the traditional TPB variables. Results also showed that gender altered how traditional TPB variables, empathy, and anticipated regret predict bystander’s intention to help cyberbullying victims: Empathy and anticipated regret were most robust predictors for males and females, respectively. These results suggest that the TPB is a useful theoretical framework for understanding bystanders’ intention to help cyberbullying victims. Implications for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies are discussed.
AbrahamC.SheeranP. (2004). Deciding to exercise: The role of anticipated regret. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910704773891096
AlhabashS.McAlisterA. R.HagerstromA.QuilliamE. T.RifonN. J.RichardsJ. I. (2013). Between likes and shares: Effects of emotional appeal and virality on the persuasiveness of anticyberbullying messages on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0265
4.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
BarlettC. P. (2017). From theory to practice: Cyberbullying theory and its application to intervention. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.060
7.
BarlińskaJ.SzusterA.WiniewskiM. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137
8.
BarlińskaJ.SzusterA.WiniewskiM. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(799). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799
9.
BastiaensensS.PabianS.VandeboschH.PoelsK.CleemputK. VanDeSmetA.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2016). From normative influence to social pressure: How relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying. Social Development, 25, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12134
10.
BastiaensensS.VandeboschH.PoelsK.CleemputK. VanDeSmetA.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites: An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
11.
BastiaensensS.VandeboschH.PoelsK.CleemputK. VanDeSmetA.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2015). “Can I afford to help?” How affordances of communication modalities guide bystanders’ helping intentions towards harassment on social network sites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.983979
12.
BrewerN. T.DeFrankJ. T.GilkeyM. B. (2016). Anticipated regret and health behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35, 1264–1275. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000294
CleemputK. VanVandeboschH.PabianS. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534
16.
DeSmetA.BastiaensensS.CleemputK. VanPoelsK.VandeboschH.CardonG.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051
17.
DeSmetA.BastiaensensS.CleemputK. VanPoelsK.VandeboschH.DeboutteG.HerrewijnL.MallietS.PabianS.BroeckhovenF. VanDe TroyerO.DeglorieG.HoeckeS. VanSamynK.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2018). Psychometric data of a questionnaire to measure cyberbullying bystander behavior and its behavioral determinants among adolescents. Data in Brief, 18, 1588–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.087
18.
DeSmetA.VeldemanC.PoelsK.BastiaensensS.CleemputK. VanVandeboschH.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2014). Determinants of self-reported bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents amongst adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0027
19.
DoaneA. N.EhlkeS.KelleyM. L. (2020). Bystanders against cyberbullying: A video program for college students. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00051-5
20.
DoaneA. N.KelleyM. L.PearsonM. R. (2016). Reducing cyberbullying: A theory of reasoned action-based video prevention program for college students. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21610
21.
DoaneA. N.PearsonM. R.KelleyM. L. (2014). Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the Theory of Reasoned Action. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.051
22.
ErreygersS.PabianS.VandeboschH.BaillienE. (2016). Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.003
23.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
24.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
25.
FisherR. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351
26.
GahaganK.VaterlausJ. M.FrostL. R. (2016). College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: Conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.019
27.
GauldC. S.LewisI.WhiteK. M. (2014). Concealing their communication: Exploring psychosocial predictors of young drivers’ intentions and engagement in concealed texting. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 62, 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.016
HayashiY.ForemanA. M.FriedelJ. E.WirthO. (2019). Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213453
30.
HayashiY.TahmasbiN. (2020). Decision-making process underlying bystanders’ helping cyberbullying victims: A behavioral economic analysis of role of social discounting. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106157
31.
HeirmanW.WalraveM. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24, 614–620.
32.
HeirmanW.WalraveM.VandeboschH.WeggeD.EggermontS.PabianS. (2016). Cyberbullying research in Belgium: An overview of generated insights and a critical assessment of the mediation of technology in a web 2.0 world. In R. Navarro, S. Yubero & E. Larrañaga (Eds.),Cyberbullying across the globe: Gender, family, and mental health (pp. 169–191). Springer International Publishing.
33.
JafarkarimiH.SaadatdoostR.SimA. T. H.HeeJ. (2017). Determinant factors of cyberbullying: An application of Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95, 6472–6482.
34.
JenaroC.FloresN.FríasC. P. (2018). Systematic review of empirical studies on cyberbullying in adults: What we know and what we should investigate. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.12.003
KochE. J. (2014). How does anticipated regret influence health and safety decisions? A literature review. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.935379
37.
KokkinosC. M.AntoniadouN.MarkosA. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.001
38.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, S13–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
39.
KowalskiR. M.TothA.MorganM. (2018). Bullying and cyberbullying in adulthood and the workplace. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158, 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1302402
40.
KyriacouC.ZuinA. (2018). Cyberbullying bystanders and moral engagement: A psychosocial analysis for pastoral care. Pastoral Care in Education, 36, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2018.1453857
41.
MacaulayP.J. R.BoultonM. J.BettsL. R. (2019). Comparing early adolescents’ positive bystander responses to cyberbullying and traditional bullying: The impact of severity and gender. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0082-2
42.
MacháčkováH.DedkovaL.SevcikovaA.CernaA. (2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2135
Olenik-ShemeshD.HeimanT.EdenS. (2017). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal–socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515585531
45.
PabianS.VandeboschH. (2014). Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.858626
46.
PabianS.VandeboschH.PoelsK.CleemputK. VanBastiaensensS. (2016). Exposure to cyberbullying as a bystander: An investigation of desensitization effects among early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.022
47.
ParkerD.StradlingS. G.MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Modifying beliefs and attitudes to exceeding the speed limit: An intervention study based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01835.x
48.
PattersonL. J.AllanA.CrossD. (2016). Adolescent bystanders’ perspectives of aggression in the online versus school environments. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.02.003
49.
PattersonL. J.AllanA.CrossD. (2017). Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 19, 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815606369
50.
PeluchetteJ. V.KarlK.WoodC.WilliamsJ. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization: Do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem?Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.028
RashidM. S. B. A.MohamedS. B.AzmanT. A. T. M. (2017). Predicting the intention to cyberbully and cyberbullying behaviour among the undergraduate students at the International Islamic University Malaysia. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2, 257–270.
53.
RosenthalS. R.BukaS. L.MarshallB. D. L.CareyK. B.ClarkM. A. (2016). Negative experiences on Facebook and depressive symptoms among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59, 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.023
SandbergT.ConnerM. (2008). Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X258704
56.
SchenkA. M.FremouwW. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.630310
57.
SelkieE. M.KotaR.ChanY.-F.MorenoM. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0371
58.
SelyaA. S.RoseJ. S.DierkerL. C.HedekerD.MermelsteinR. J. (2012). A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(111). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111
59.
ShevlinB. R. K.GoodwinK. A. (2019). Past behavior and the decision to text while driving among young adults. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.027
60.
ShultzE.HeilmanR.KathleenJ. H. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An exploration of bystander behavior and motivation. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(4). https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4324/3374
SmithA. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
63.
SmithJ.YoonJ. (2013). Cyberbullying presence, extent, and forms in a midwestern post-secondary institution. Information Systems Education Journal, 11, 52–78.
64.
SongJ.OhI. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008
65.
SteinmetzH.KnappsteinM.AjzenI.SchmidtP.KabstR. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior?: A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 224, 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255
66.
SticcaF.PerrenS. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3
67.
Wong-LoM.BullockL. M. (2014). Digital metamorphosis: Examination of the bystander culture in cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.007
68.
ZeelenbergM. (1999). The use of crying over spilled milk: A note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/095150899105800
