Racial demographic changes can influence racially motivated crime rates, often explained by group threat theories. These theories suggest that dominant groups may exhibit antagonistic behaviors towards minorities when perceived as threats to resources like political, economic, or social goods. This threat is usually measured by the proportion of minorities relative to white residents, but recent studies of racial threat in relation to legal mobilization have expanded to consider larger ecological units beyond local areas, emphasizing the role of geographically mediated racial threat. Using hate crime data from the UCR, this study finds limited evidence for a top-down spatial transmission of racial threat. Instead, it suggests that racially motivated hate crime is prevalent in white-dominated areas within larger white locales, driven by geographically reinforced power differentials.
AndrewsK. T.SeguinC. (2015). Group threat and policy change: The spatial dynamics of prohibition politics, 1890–1919. American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 475–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/682134
2.
BaileyC. M. (2023). The evolution of anti-Blackness in the American south: How slavery and segregation perpetuates the victimization of Black people. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 60(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221120811
3.
BalboniJ. M.McDevittJ. (2001). Hate crime reporting: Understanding police officer perceptions, departmental protocol, and the role of the victim is there such a thing as a “love” crime?Justice Research and Policy, 3(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.3.1.2001.1
4.
BaumerE. P.MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (2003). Explaining spatial variation in support for capital punishment: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1086/367921
5.
BehrensA.UggenC.ManzaJ. (2003). Ballot manipulation and the “menace of negro domination”: Racial threat and felon disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850–2002. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 559–605. https://doi.org/10.1086/378647
6.
BellJ. (2002). Policing hatred: Law enforcement, civil rights, and hate crime. NYU Press.
7.
BellJ. (2013). Hate thy neighbor: Move-in violence and the persistence of racial segregation in American housing. NYU Press.
8.
BenierK.WickesR.HigginsonA. (2016). Ethnic hate crime in Australia: Diversity and change in the neighbourhood context. British Journal of Criminology, 56(3), 479-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv067
9.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. Capricorn Books.
10.
BoessenA.HippJ. R. (2015). Close-ups and the scale of ecology: Land uses and the geography of social context and crime. Criminology, 53(3), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12074
11.
BorgM. J.HolderE. (2025). Hate crime as social control: Integrating Black’s theories of conflict management and social time. Sociological Inquiry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.70005
12.
DishaI.CavendishJ. C.KingR. D. (2011). Historical events and spaces of hate: Hate crimes against Arabs and Muslims in post-9/11 America. Social Problems, 58(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2011.58.1.21
13.
FeldmeyerB.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 238–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810391538
14.
FeldmeyerB.WarrenP. Y.SiennickS. E.NeptuneM. (2015). Racial, ethnic, and immigrant threat: Is there a new criminal threat on state sentencing?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814548488
15.
GladfelterA. S.LantzB.RubackR. B. (2017). The complexity of hate crime and bias activity: Variation across contexts and types of bias. Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1096952
16.
GrattetR. (2009). The urban ecology of bias crime: A study of disorganized and defended neighborhoods. Social Problems, 56(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.1.132
17.
GrattetR.JennessV. (2005). The reconstitution of law in local settings: Agency discretion, ambiguity, and a surplus of law in the policing of hate crime. Law & Society Review, 39(4), 893–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2005.00248.x
18.
GrattetR.JennessV. (2008). Transforming symbolic law into organizational action: Hate crime policy and law enforcement practice. Social Forces, 87(1), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0122
19.
GreenD. P.StrolovitchD. Z.WongJ. S. (1998). Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 372–403. https://doi.org/10.1086/210042
20.
GusfieldJ. R. (1986). Symbolic crusade: Status politics and the American temperance movement. University of Illinois Press.
21.
HippJ. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200501
22.
HippJ. R.TitaG. E.BoggessL. N. (2009). Intergroup and intragroup violence: Is violent crime an expression of group conflict or social disorganization?Criminology, 47(2), 521-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00150.x
23.
HolderE. (2024). The convergence of hate: An analysis of UCR–NCVS hate crime trends, 2003 to 2020. Crime & Delinquency, 70(6–7), 1864–1892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221131001
24.
HolderE.EdwardsB.OsborneD. (2024). An exploratory study on the structural and demographic predictors of hate crime across the rural-urban divide. Victims & Offenders, 19(3), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2117751
25.
HolmesM. D.PainterM. A.II. (2023). Hispanic threat and police strength in U.S. Municipalities: The moderating influences of nativity and region. Social Problems, 70(2), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab051
26.
JennessV.GrattetR. (2005). The law-in-between: The effects of organizational perviousness on the policing of hate crime. Social Problems, 52(3), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.3.337
27.
JohnstonR. J.GregoryD.SmithD. M. (1994). The dictionary of human geography (3rd ed.). Blackwell.
28.
KaplanJ. (2025a). Summary Reporting System (SRS)—Hate crime data [Dataset]. Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data (Version V1). Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/doi:10.7910/DVN/TCB5UG
29.
KaplanJ. (2025b). Summary Reporting System (SRS) – Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) [Dataset]. Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program (Version V1). Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AHDIWG
KimY.-A.WoJ. C. (2022). Revisiting the relationship between racial heterogeneity and neighborhood crime: Do spatial scale and functional form matter?Crime & Delinquency, 68(11), 1977–2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221074969
32.
KingR. D. (2007). The context of minority group threat: Race, institutions, and complying with hate crime law. Law & Society Review, 41(1), 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00295.x
33.
KingR. D.MessnerS. F.BallerR. D. (2009). Contemporary hate crimes, law enforcement, and the legacy of racial violence. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400207
34.
LantzB.GladfelterA. S.RubackR. B. (2019). Stereotypical hate crimes and criminal justice processing: A multi-dataset comparison of bias crime arrest patterns by offender and victim race. Justice Quarterly, 36(2), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1399211
35.
LautenschlagerR.OmoriM. (2019). Racial threat, social (dis) organization, and the ecology of police: Towards a macro-level understanding of police use-of-force in communities of color. Justice Quarterly, 36(6), 1050–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1480792
36.
LegewieJ. (2018). Living on the edge: Neighborhood boundaries and the spatial dynamics of violent crime. Demography, 55, 1957–1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0708-1
37.
LegewieJ.SchaefferM. (2016). Contested boundaries: Explaining where ethnoracial diversity provokes neighborhood conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 122(1), 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1086/686942
38.
LeVineR. A.CampbellD. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. Wiley.
39.
LongS. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage.
40.
LopezJ. J.JangW.PrewP. A.LepeL.MataitisR. (2023). The geography of Hate: Spatial patterns of bias-Motivated crimes in Minnesota, 2015–18. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(1), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09647-4
41.
LyonsC. J. (2007). Community (dis)organization and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 815–863. https://doi.org/10.1086/521846
42.
LyonsC. J. (2008). Defending turf: Racial demographics and hate crime against blacks and whites. Social Forces, 87(1), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0071
43.
MaltzM. D.TargonskiJ. (2002). A note on the use of county-level UCR data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016060020848
44.
MansonS.SchroederJ.Van RiperD.KnowlesK.KuglerT.RobertsF.RugglesS. (2023). National historical geographic information system: Version 18.0 (Version 18.0) [Dataset]. IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V18.0
MartinS. E. (1995). “A cross-burning is not just an arson”: Police social construction of hate crimes in Baltimore County. Criminology, 33(3), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01180.x
47.
MartinS. E. (1996). Investigating hate crimes: Case characteristics and law enforcement responses. Justice Quarterly, 13(3), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093051
McNeeleyS.OverstreetS. (2018). Lifestyle-routine activities, neighborhood context, and ethnic hate crime victimization. Violence and Victims, 33(5), 932–948. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00136
50.
McVeighR.WelchM. R.BjarnasonT. (2003). Hate crime reporting as a successful social movement outcome. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 843–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240306800603
51.
MedlicottC. (2004). One social milieu, paradoxical response: A geographical examination of the Ku Klux Klan and the Daughters of the American Revolution in the early twentieth century. In FlintC. (Ed.), Spaces of hate: Geographies of discrimination and intolerance in the USA (pp. 21–47). Routledge.
52.
MillsC. E. (2020a). A common target: Anti-Jewish hate crime in New York City communities, 1995-2010. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(6), 643–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820902832
53.
MillsC. E. (2020b). Hatred simmering in the melting pot: An analysis of hate crime in New York City, 1995–2010. Justice Quarterly, 37(3), 486–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1606271
54.
MillsC. E. (2021). Gay visibility and disorganized and strained communities: A community-level analysis of anti-gay hate crime in New York City. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), 8070–8091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519848784
55.
MillsJ. M.LantzB.WengerM. R. (2024). Understanding community hate crimes as an incorrigible proposition: Local political attitudes, path dependence, and the ceremonious reporting of hate crime statistics. Criminology, 62(3), 381–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12378
56.
MorrisK. T. (2023). A right restricted: Racial threat and the sponsorship of restrictive voting laws. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 8(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2023.26
NolanJ. J.AkiyamaY.BerhanuS. (2002). The hate crime statistics act of 1990: Developing a method for measuring the occurrence of hate violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202046001009
60.
OpenshawS.TaylorP. J. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In WrigleyN. (Ed.), Statistical applications in the spatial sciences (pp. 127–144). Pion.
61.
PiatkowskaS. J.MessnerS. F. (2022). Group threat, same-sex marriage, and hate crime based on sexual orientation. Justice Quarterly, 39(4), 802–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1854833
62.
PiatkowskaS. J.MessnerS. F.HövermannA. (2020). Black out-group marriages and hate crime rates: A cross-sectional analysis of U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(1), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427819864142
63.
PiatkowskaS. J.MessnerS. F.YangT.-C. (2018). Xenophobic and racially motivated crime in Belgium: Exploratory spatial data analysis and spatial regressions of structural covariates. Deviant Behavior, 39(11), 1398–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1479917
64.
PiatkowskaS. J.MessnerS. F.YangT.-C. (2019). Understanding the relationship between relative group size and hate crime rates: Linking methods with concepts. Justice Quarterly, 36(6), 1072–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1482942
65.
RubackR. B.GladfelterA. S.LantzB. (2018). Hate crime victimization data in Pennsylvania: A useful complement to the Uniform Crime Reports. Violence and Victims, 33(2), 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.v33.i2.173
66.
SouleS. A. (2013). Diffusion and scale shift. In SnowD. A.della PortaD.McAdamD.KlandermansB (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of social and political movements. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm430
67.
StaceyM.Carbone-LópezK.RosenfeldR. (2011). Demographic change and ethnically motivated crime: The impact of immigration on anti-Hispanic hate crime in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211412560
SuttlesG. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. University of Chicago Press.
70.
SweeneyM. M.ChenaneJ. L.PerligerA. (2022). The role of demographic diversification of the police force in curbing hate crimes: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Police Practice and Research, 23(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2021.1919109
71.
SwyngedouwE. (1997). Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In CoxK. R. (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). The Guilford Press.
72.
VogelM.LentzT. S.SteenbeekW. (2024). Contested neighborhood boundaries and intergroup and intragroup violence. Crime & Delinquency, 70(11), 2906–2931. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231202783
WangX.MearsD. P. (2010). A multilevel test of minority threat effects on sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9076-8
76.
WengerM. R. (2019). Clarifying the relationship between racial diversity and crime: Neighborhoods versus cities. Crime & Delinquency, 65(11), 1513–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718768726
77.
WengerM. R. (2021). Omitted level bias in multilevel research: An empirical test distinguishing block group, tract, and city effects of disadvantage on crime. Justice Quarterly, 8(5), 792–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1649449
78.
WengerM. R.LantzB. (2022). Hate crime and place: The spatial and temporal concentration of bias-motivated crime in Washington, DC. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP10683–NP10708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520987817
