Guardianship is a multidimensional concept that influences the risk of victimization. However, the influence of the household—central to people’s routines—has been overlooked. Using data from the NCVS (2017–2022), this study employs a multilevel analysis of household guardianship to investigate residents’ risk of violent victimization and domestic violence, controlling for individual-level factors. Living in single-unit households, marriage, and owning a home reduce the risk of violent victimization. Conversely, owning a business and residing in urban areas increase this risk. For domestic violence, living in single-unit households increases the risk, whereas gated communities lower the risk. Implications for crime prevention and future directions on guardianship are discussed.
AddingtonL. A.RennisonC. M. (2015). Keeping the barbarians outside the gate? Comparing burglary victimization in gated and non-gated communities. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.760644
2.
AdmireA.RamirezB. (2021). Violence and disability: Experiences and perceptions of victimization among deaf people. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), NP1–NP25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517730564
BirksD.DaviesT. (2017). Street network structure and crime risk: An agent-based investigation of the encounter and enclosure hypotheses. Criminology, 55(4), 900–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12163
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2020a, February27). National Crime Victimization Survey [United States], 2018, User Guide (ICPSR 37297). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37297.v1
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2020b, September21). National Crime Victimization Survey [United States], 2019, User Guide (ICPSR 37645). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37645.v1
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2021, October18). National Crime Victimization Survey [United States], 2020, User Guide (ICPSR 38090). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38090.v1
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2022, September19). National Crime Victimization Survey [United States], 2021, User Guide (ICPSR 38429). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38429.v1
9.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2023, September18). National Crime Victimization Survey [United States], 2022, User Guide (ICPSR 38603). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38603.v1
ClarkeR. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150.
12.
CohenL. E.KluegelJ. R.LandK. C. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review,46, 505–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094935
13.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rates trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
14.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.ClearE. R.BrancatoC. J.McCauleyH. L. (2020). Bystander program effectiveness to reduce violence and violence acceptance within sexual minority male and female high school students using a cluster RCT. Prevention Science, 21, 434–444.
15.
CokerA. L.BushH. M.Cook-CraigP. G.DeGueS. A.ClearE. R.BrancatoC. J.FisherB. S.RecktenwaldE. A. (2017). RCT testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 566–578.
16.
CookA.LeclercB.ReynaldD. M.WortleyR. (2021). The micro-situational context of sexual offences against adult women: Unpacking the role of guardianship intensity in disruption. Crime & Delinquency, 67(6–7), 839–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720954348
17.
CoupeT.BlakeL. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44(2), 431–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00054.x
18.
EckJ. E. (1994). Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. University of Maryland.
19.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. Crime and Place, 4, 53–66.
HarrellE., (2021). Crime against persons with disabilities, 2009-2019 – Statistical tables. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/capd0919st.pdf
23.
HartT. C.RennisonC. M.GibsonC. (2005). Revisiting respondent “fatigue bias” in the National Crime Victimization Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(3), 345–363. DOI: 10.1007/s10940-005-4275-4
24.
HayesB. E. (2018). Repeat victimization among intimate partner violence victims: The impact of guardianship. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116651714
25.
HayesB. E. (2022). Development and application of individual and national opportunity to the experience of intimate partner violence among married women in the Global South. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(3), 327–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211049940
26.
HeronR. L.EismaM.BrowneK. (2022). Why do female domestic violence victims remain in or leave abusive relationships? A qualitative study. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 31(5), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2021.2019154
27.
Hollis-PeelM. E.ReynaldD. M.Van BavelM.ElffersH.WelshB. C. (2011). Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9309-2
28.
Hollis-PeelM. E.WelshB. C. (2014). What makes a guardian capable? A test of guardianship in action. Security Journal, 27, 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2012.32
29.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
30.
KenneyC. T.McLanahanS. S. (2006). Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages?Demography, 43, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0007
KinneyJ. B.BrantinghamP. L.WuschkeK.KirkM. G.BrantinghamP. J. (2008). Crime attractors, generators and detractors: Land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environment, 34(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.34.1.62
33.
LevittS. D. (1999). The changing relationship between income and crime victimization. Economic Policy Review, 5(3), 87–98. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1014080
34.
LindbladM. R.ManturukK. R.QuerciaR. G. (2013). Sense of community and informal social control among lower income households: The role of homeownership and collective efficacy in reducing subjective neighborhood crime and disorder. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9507-9
35.
LinningS. J.EckJ. E. (2021). Whose ‘eyes on the street’ control crime? Expanding place management into neighborhoods. Cambridge University Press.
36.
MacMillanR. (2001). Violence and the life course: The consequences of victimization for personal and social development. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 1–22.
37.
MahoneyB.DaviesM.Scurlock-Evans. (2014). Victimization among female and male sexual minority status group: Evidence from the British Crime Survey 2007-2010. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(10), 1435–1461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.928575
38.
McCabeB. J. (2013). Are homeowners better citizens? Homeownership and community participation in the United States. Social Forces, 91(3), 929–954.
39.
MietheT. D.MeierR. F. (1990). Opportunity, choice, and criminal victimization: A test of a theoretical model. Journal of research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(3), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427890027003003
40.
MietheT. D.MeierR. F. (1994). Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. SUNY Press.
MorganR. E.ThompsonA. (2021). Crime victimization, 2020. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
43.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (1998). Predicting risks of larceny theft victimization: A routine activity analysis using refined lifestyle measures. Criminology, 36(4), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01267.x
44.
NewmanO. (1972). Defensible space: People and design in the violent city. Architectural Press.
45.
OrfilaF.Coma-SoléM.CabanasM.Cegri-LombardoF.Moleras-SerraA.Pujol-RiberaE. (2018). Family caregiver mistreatment of the elderly: Prevalence of risk and associated factors. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5067-8
46.
PalmerJ. E.NicksaS. C.McMahonS. (2018). Does who you know affect how you act? The impact of relationships on bystander intervention in interpersonal violence situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2623–2642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516628292
47.
PiqueroA. R. (2024). Racial inequality in firearm homicide victimization—but not other types of US violence. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-023-00093-2
48.
ReuterT. R.NewcombM. E.WhittonS. W.MustanskiB. (2017). Intimate partner violence victimization in LGBT Young adults: Demographic differences and associations with health behaviors. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000031
49.
ReynaldD. M. (2009). Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2008.19
50.
ReynaldD. M. (2010). Guardians on guardianship: Factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 358–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810365904
51.
ReynaldD. M. (2011). Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 110–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810384138
52.
ReynaldD. M.ElffersH. (2015). The routine activity of guardianship: Comparing self-reports of guardianship intensity patterns with proxy measures. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 17, 211–232. doi:10.1057/cpcs.2015.9
53.
Salas-EljatibC.Fuentes-RamirezA.GregoireT. G.AltamiranoA.YaitulV. (2018). A study on the effects of unbalanced data when fitting logistic regression models in ecology. Ecological Indicators, 85, 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.030.
54.
SampsonR. J. (1986). Crime in cities: The effects of formal and informal social control. Crime and Justice, 8, 271–311.
55.
SampsonR. J.WooldredgeJ. D. (1987). Linking the micro-and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066837
56.
ShimH. (2023). Victimization of others: Race, ethnicity, crime victimization, and shielded routines [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1704980855863776
57.
SidebottomA.TompsonL.ThorntonA.BullockK.TilleyN.BowersK.JohnsonS. D. (2018). Gating alleys to reduce crime: A meta-analysis and realist synthesis. Justice Quarterly, 35(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1293135
58.
SkardhamarT.SavolainenJ.AaseK. N.LyngstadT. H. (2015). Does marriage reduce crime?Crime and Justice, 44(1), 385–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/681557
59.
SmithD. A.JarjouraG. R. (1989). Household characteristics, neighborhood composition and victimization risk. Social forces, 68(2), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.2.621
60.
ThompsonA.TappS. (2023). Crime victimization, 2022. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
61.
TurnerH. A.FinkelhorD.HambyS. L.ShattuckA. (2013). Family structure, victimization, and child mental health in a nationally representative sample. Social Science & Medicine, 87, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.034
62.
WhiteG. F. (2001). Home ownership: Crime and the tipping and trapping processes. Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973016
63.
WilcoxP.MadensenT. D.TillyerM. S. (2007). Guardianship in context: Implications for burglary victimization risk and prevention. Criminology, 45(4), 771–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00094.x
64.
WilcoxP.QuisenberryN.JonesS. (2003). The built environment and community crime risk interpretation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(3), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803253801
65.
Wilson-DoengesG. (2000). An exploration of sense of community and fear of crime in gated communities. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972694
66.
XieM.BaumerE. P. (2021). Immigrant status, citizenship, and victimization risk in the United States: New findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology, 59(4), 610–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12278
