Consequences of Identity Theft Victimization: Disabilities and Mental Distress

Abstract

This study contributes to the growing literature on consequences of identity theft victimization as well as the broader literature on disabilities and victimization by exploring the connection between mental distress and disability status of an identity theft victim. This study analyzes data from the 2018 iteration of the National Crime Victimization Survey Identity Theft Supplement. Specifically, through logistic regression analysis, this study examines if severe mental distress experienced by identity theft victims varies in relation to their disability status and disability type. Identity theft victims with physical disabilities and multiple forms of disabilities are more likely than individuals with no disabilities to experience severe mental distress after their identity theft victimization. Practice and research implications are discussed.

Keywords

identity theft disability distress mental health the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2002). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Missing data. Sage.

Allison

P. D.

(2012). Logistic regression for rare events. https://statisticalhorizons.com/logistic-regression-for-rare-events/

Betz

A. E.

(2012). The experiences of adult/child identity theft victims [Doctoral dissertation]. Iowa State University.

Bouffard

L. A.

Koeppel

M. D.

(2014). Understanding the potential long-term physical and mental health consequences of early experiences of victimization. Justice Quarterly, 31(3), 568–587.

Britt

C. L.

(2001). Health consequences of criminal victimization. International Review of Victimology, 8(1), 63–73.

Bronson

Maruschak

L. M.

Berzofsky

(2015). Disabilities among prison and jail inmates, 2011–12. US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Brownridge

D. A.

(2006). Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women, 12(9), 805–822.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. National Crime Victimization Survey: Identity Theft Supplement, [United States], 2018. (2021a). Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37923.v1

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2021b). Identity theft. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=42

10.

Centers for Disease Control. (2023). Disability impacts all of US. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/infographic-disability-impacts-all.html

11.

Cree

R. A.

Okoro

C. A.

Zack

M. M.

Carbone

(2020). Frequent mental distress among adults, by disability status, disability type, and selected characteristics—United States, 2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(36), 1238.

12.

Deem

(2018). International financial crimes: How do we turn the tide and help older victims? Federal Bureau of Investigations.

13.

DeLiema

Burnes

Langton

(2021). The financial and psychological impact of identity theft among older adults. Innovation in Aging, 5(4), igab043.

14.

DeLisi

Jones-Johnson

Johnson

W. R.

Hochstetler

(2014). The aftermath of criminal victimization: Race, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 60(1), 85–105.

15.

Dembo

R. S.

Mitra

McKee

(2018). The psychological consequences of violence against people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 11(3), 390–397.

16.

Federal Trade Commission. (2004). FTC issues final rules on FACTA identity theft definitions, active duty alert duration, and appropriate proof of identity. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2004/10/ftc-issues-final-rules-facta-identity-theft-definitions-active

17.

Glodstein

S. L.

Fornaro

(2010). Fraud trauma syndrome: The victims of the Bernard Madoff scandal. Journal of Forensic Studies in Accounting & Business, 2(1), 1–9.

18.

Golladay

Holtfreter

(2017). The consequences of identity theft victimization: An examination of emotional and physical health outcomes. Victims & Offenders, 12(5), 741–760.

19.

Green

Gies

Bobnis

Piquero

N. L.

Piquero

A. R.

Velasquez

(2020). The role of victim services for individuals who have experienced serious identity-based crime. Victims & offenders, 15(6), 720–743.

20.

Harrell

(2017). Victims of identity theft, 2014. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit14.pdf

21.

Harrell

(2019). Victims of identity theft, 2016. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit16.pdf

22.

Harrell

(2021). Victims of identity theft, 2018. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit18.pdf

23.

Harrell

Langton

(2013). Victims of identity theft, 2012. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit12.pdf

24.

Hayes

B. E.

Powers

R. A.

(2022). Heterogeneity of disabilities and the consequences of victimization: Findings from a nationally representative sample. Justice Quarterly, 39(5), 1059–1078.

25.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2003). Identity theft: The aftermath 2003. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/page-docs/IdentityTheftTheAftermath2003.pdf

26.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2005). Identity theft: The aftermath 2004. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2004.pdf

27.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2007). Identity theft: The aftermath 2006. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2006.pdf

28.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2008). Identity theft: The aftermath 2007. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2007.pdf

29.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2009). Identity theft: The aftermath 2008. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2008.pdf

30.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2010). Identity theft: The aftermath 2009. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2009.pdf

31.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2014). Identity theft: The aftermath 2013. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2013.pdf

32.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2015). Identity theft: The aftermath 2014. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/surveys_studies/Aftermath2014FINAL.pdf

33.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2017). Identity theft: The aftermath 2016. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/page-docs/AftermathFinal_2016.pdf

34.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2018a). Identity theft: The aftermath 2017. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/images/page-docs/Aftermath_2017.pdf

35.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2018b). The aftermath: The non-economic impacts of identity theft. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ITRC_Aftermath-2018_Web_FINAL.pdf

36.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2021). ITRC 2021 consumer aftermath report. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/publication/identity-theft-the-aftermath-study

37.

Identity Theft Resource Center. (2023). Taking identity crime victimization seriously. https://www.idtheftcenter.org/post/taking-identity-crime-victimization-seriously-call-for-comprehensive-support/

38.

Irvin-Erickson

Ricks

(2019). Identity theft and fraud victimization: What we know about identity theft and fraud victims from research-and practice-based evidence. https://victimresearch.org/research/research-syntheses/

39.

Johnson

M. C.

Kercher

G. A.

(2009). Identifying predictors of negative psychological reactions to stalking victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(5), 866–882.

40.

Karp

Kirkman

(2016). Financial frauds and scams against elders: Government responses and resources. National Consumer Law Center. Retrieved from https://www.nclc.org/national-elder-rights-training-project/consumer-fraud-scams/financial-frauds-scams-against-elders.html

41.

Langton

Planty

(2010). Victims of identity theft, 2008. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit08.pdf

42.

National Center for Victims of Crime and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Investor Education Foundation. (2013). Taking action: An advocate’s guide to assisting victims of financial fraud.

43.

Okoro

C. A.

Hollis

N. D.

Cyrus

A. C.

Griffin-Blake

(2018). Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type among adults—United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(32), 882.

44.

OVC. (2012). Multidisciplinary response to crime victims with disabilities. https://ovc.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh226/files/pubs/victimswithdisabilities/stateguide/overview.html

45.

Padden

(1980). The deaf community and the culture of deaf people. In Baker

Pattison

(Eds.), Sign language and the deaf community (pp. 89–103). National Association of the Deaf.

46.

Pascual

Marchini

Miller

(2018). 2018 identity fraud: Fraud enters a new era of complexity. https://javelinstrategy.com/research/2018-identity-fraud-fraud-enters-new-era-complexity

47.

Petersilia

J. R.

(2001). Crime victims with developmental disabilities: A review essay. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(6), 655–694.

48.

Ponemon Institute. (2013). 2013 survey on medical identity theft. https://www.ponemon.org/local/upload/file/2013MedicalIdentityTheftReportFINAL11.pdf

49.

Powers

R. A.

Hayes

B. E.

(2023). Victim and third-party reporting of violent victimization to the police in incidents involving victims with disabilities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(23–24), 12135–12160.

50.

Rand

M. R.

Harrell

(2009). Crime against people with disabilities, 2007: National Crime Victimization Survey. U.S. Department of Justice.

51.

Randa

Reyns

B. W.

(2019). The physical and emotional toll of identity theft victimization: A situational and demographic analysis of the National Crime Victimization Survey. Deviant Behavior, 41(10), 1290–1304.

52.

Reyns

B. W.

Scherer

(2018). Stalking victimization among college students: The role of disability within a lifestyle-routine activity framework. Crime & Delinquency, 64(5), 650–673.

53.

Reyns

B. W.

Scherer

(2019). Disability type and risk of sexual and stalking victimization in a national sample: A lifestyle-routine activity approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 628–647.

54.

Synovate. (2007). Federal trade commission – 2006 identity theft survey report. https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-tradecommission-2006-identity-theft-survey-report-preparedcommission-synovate/synovatereport.pdf

55.

Tucker

C. J.

Finkelhor

Turner

(2017). Victimization by siblings in children with disability or weight problems. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 38(6), 378–384.

56.

Wallace

(2021). Criminology, criminal justice, and 30 years of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Where is the research from our field? The Criminologist, 46(2), 1–6.

57.

Zablotsky

Black

L. I.

Maenner

M. J.

Schieve

L. A.

Danielson

M. L.

Bitsko

R. H.

Blumberg

S. J.

Kogan

M. D.

Boyle

C. A.

(2019). Prevalence and trends of developmental disabilities among children in the United States: 2009–2017. Pediatrics, 144(4), e20190811.