This study investigated the relationship between empathy and felony recidivism among juvenile offenders, with a focus on sex differences. Utilizing a sample of 4,372 incarcerated juveniles, we analyzed four empathy measures derived from the PACT assessment. Our findings revealed that male violent offenders exhibited higher levels of empathy and responsibility acceptance compared to their female counterparts. Notably, male sex offenders who respected authority demonstrated significantly lower recidivism rates, while female violent offenders who respected others’ property were also less likely to recidivate. No other empathy measures were related to male or female recidivism. These results enhance our understanding of empathy’s role in juvenile recidivism, offering valuable implications for research and practice in the juvenile justice system.
AlwardL. (2024). Procedural justice and probation officer legitimacy: Testing the process-based model in community supervision. Journal of Criminal Justice, 92, 102187.
2.
AlwardL.BakerT.GordonJ. (2021). Procedural justice and incarcerated people’s obligation to obey institutional rules: An examination of current, former, and never-gang members. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73, 10157.
3.
BalyA.ButlerS. (2017). Empathy deficits and adolescent sexual offending: A systematic review of the evidence base. Aggression and violent behavior, 36, 81–97.
4.
BarnettG. D.MannR. E. (2013). Cognition, empathy, and sexual offending. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), 22–33.
5.
BockE. M.HosserD. (2014). Empathy as a predictor of recidivism among young adult offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(2), 101–115.
6.
BroidyL.CauffmanE.EspelageD. L.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (2003). Sex differences in empathy and its relation to juvenile offending. Violence and Victims, 18(5), 503–516.
7.
BurkeD. M. (2001). Empathy in sexually offending and nonoffending adolescent males. Journal of interpersonal violence, 16(3), 222–233.
8.
CaseyW. M.SiennickS. E. (2023). Juvenile recidivism: an examination of state measurement strategies. American journal of criminal justice, 48(3), 786–807.
9.
ChambersJ. C.WardT.EcclestonL.BrownM. (2009). The pathways model of assault: A qualitative analysis of the assault offender and offense. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1423−1449.
10.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P.BalesW. D.StewartE. A. (2014). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1044–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.736526
11.
DayA.CaseyS.GeraceA. (2010). Interventions to improve empathy awareness in sexual and violent offenders: Conceptual, empirical, and clinical issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(3), 201–208.
12.
EisenbergN.StrayerJ. (Eds.). (1987). Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press.
13.
FaganJ.PiqueroA.R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748.
14.
FernandezY. M.MarshallW. L. (2003). Victim empathy, social self-esteem, and psychopathy in rapists. Sexual abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 11–26.
15.
FeshbackN. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. Counseling Psychology, 4, 25–30.
16.
FineA.FountainE.VidalS. (2019). Juveniles’ beliefs about and perceptions of probation predict technical violations and delinquency. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(2), 116–125.
17.
HayC.WiddowsonA. O.BatesM.BaglivioM. T.JackowskiK. J.GreenwaldM. A. (2018). Predicting recidivism among released juvenile offenders in Florida: An evaluation of the residential positive achievement change tool. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 16(1), 97–116.
18.
HoffmanM. L. (1977). Empathy: Its development and prosocial implications. In KeaslyC. B. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 169–218). University of Nebraska Press.
19.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476.
20.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611.
21.
KolivoskiK.ShookJ.JohnsonH.GoodkindSFuscoR.DeLisiM.VaughnM. (2016). Applying legal socialization to the child welfare system: Do youths’ perceptions of caseworkers matter?Child Youth Care Forum, 45, 65–83.
22.
LindseyR. E.CarlozziA. F.EellsG. T. (2001). Differences in the dispositional empathy of juvenile sex offenders, non-sex-offending delinquent juveniles, and nondelinquent juveniles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(6), 510–522.
23.
MannR. E.BarnettG. D. (2013). Victim empathy intervention with sexual offenders: Rehabilitation, punishment, or correctional quackery?Sexual Abuse, 25(3), 282–301.
24.
McCarthyD.Brunton-SmithI. (2018). The effect of penal legitimacy on prisoners’ postrelease desistance. Crime & Delinquency, 64(7), 917–938.
25.
McLeanK.WolfeS.PrattT. (2019). Legitimacy and the life course: An age-graded examination of changes in legitimacy attitudes over time. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 42–83.
26.
MillerP. A.EisenbergN. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 324.
27.
NarveyC. S.PerezK. L.WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T.PiqueroA. R. (2023). Gender differences in the empathy–recidivism relationship. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(5), 688–707.
28.
NarveyC.YangJ.WolffK. T.BaglivioM.PiqueroA. R. (2021). The interrelationship between empathy and adverse childhood experiences and their impact on juvenile recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(1), 45–67.
29.
O’NeillK. K. (2020). Adolescence, empathy, and the gender gap in delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 15(4), 410–437.
30.
PennerE. K.ViljoenJ. L.DouglasK. S.RoeschR. (2014). Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: Predicting recidivism in youth. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 225–237.
31.
SmithD. K.LeveL. D.ChamberlainP. (2006). Adolescent girls’ offending and health-risking sexual behavior: The predictive role of trauma. Child Maltreatment, 11(4), 346–353.
32.
TisakM.GoldsteinS. (2023). Criminality, cognitive distortions, empathy, and legitimacy of laws: Behaviors and perspectives of youth offenders. Current Psychology, 42, 7049–7059.
33.
TrulsonC.HaerleD.CaudillJ.DelisiM. (2016). Lost causes: Blended sentencing, second chances, and the Texas Youth Commission. University of Texas Press.
34.
TylerT. R. (2000). Multiculturalism and the willingness of citizens to defer to law and to legal authorities. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(4), 983–1019.
35.
van HallM.DirkzwagerA.van der LannP.NieuwbeertaP. (2023). Procedural justice, perceived legitimacy, and reoffending behavior in police and court setting. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 50(12), 1874–1892.
36.
van LangenM. A.StamsG. J. J.Van VugtE. S.WissinkI. B.AsscherJ. J. (2014). Explaining female offending and prosocial behavior: The role of empathy and cognitive distortions. Laws, 3(4), 706–720.
37.
van LangenM. A.WissinkI. B.van VugtE. S.Van der StouweT.StamsG. J. J. (2014). The relation between empathy and offending: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(2), 179-189.
38.
WallaceD. M.PapachristosA. V.MearesT.FaganJ. (2016). Desistance and legitimacy: The impact of offender notification meetings on recidivism among high risk offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1237–1264.
39.
WaltersG. D. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy beliefs, and moral disengagement in emerging adulthood: Explaining continuity and desistance in the moral model of criminal lifestyle development. Law and Human Behavior, 42(1), 37–49.
40.
WaltersG. D.BolgerP. C. (2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, 341–372.
41.
ZhaoJ.WangX.ZhangH. (2020). The role of perceived legitimacy and its effect on prison adaption: A longitudinal study on a Chinese juvenile prison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64, 100–123.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
