This study explores the recidivism outcomes of 1,804 serious and violent delinquents sentenced under a blended sentencing statute and released early by juvenile correctional authorities without continuing their blended sentence in adult prisons. Released at an average age of 19, roughly 50% of releases were rearrested for a felony-level offense postrelease. The remaining 50% of all releases did not incur a postrelease arrest or were rearrested for an offense no higher than a misdemeanor. Measures for assaultive institutional misconduct and prior delinquent adjudications were predictive of recidivism in models examining rearrest for any offense and rearrest for a felony only. Substance abusers, gang members, those with a gang-related commitment offense, and homicide-related state commitments were significantly more likely to be rearrested for any offense postrelease. This article ends with a discussion of implications specific to this high risk cohort of released delinquent offenders.
BendaB.CorwynR.ToombsN. (2001a). Recidivism among adolescent serious offenders: Prediction of entry into the correctional system for adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 588-613.
2.
BendaB.CorwynR.ToombsN. (2001b). From adolescent serious offender to adult felon: A predictive study of offense progression. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32(3), 79-108.
3.
BrameR.BushwayS.PaternosterR. (2003). Examining the prevalence of criminal desistance. Criminology, 41, 423-448.
4.
BrameR.FaganJ.PiqueroA.SchubertC.SteinbergL. (2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 256-272.
5.
BushwayS.PiqueroA.BroidyL.CauffmanE.MazerolleP. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39, 491-513.
6.
ButtsJ.MitchellO. (2000). Brick by brick: Dismantling the border between juvenile and adult justice. In FrielC. (Ed.), Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (pp.167-214). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
CottleC.LeeR.HeilbrunK. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367-394.
8.
DawsonR. (1988). The third justice system: The new juvenile-criminal system of determinate sentencing for the youthful violent offender in Texas. St. Mary’s Law Journal, 19, 943-1015.
9.
DawsonR. (1990). The violent juvenile offender: An empirical study of juvenile determinant sentencing proceedings as an alternative to criminal prosecution. Texas Tech Law Review, 21, 1897-1937.
10.
EzellM.CohenL. (2005). Desisting from crime: Continuity and change in long-term crime patterns of serious chronic offenders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
FaganJ. (1990). Treatment and reintegration of violent juvenile offenders: Experimental results. Justice Quarterly, 7, 233-263.
12.
FeldB. (1999). Bad kids. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
FritschE.HemmensC.CaetiT. (1996). Violent youth in juvenile and adult court: An assessment of sentencing strategies in Texas. Law & Policy, 18(1), 115-136.
14.
GriffinP. (2008). Different from adults: An updated analysis of juvenile transfer and blended sentencing laws, with recommendations for reform. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
15.
HaapanenR.BrittonL.CroisdaleT. (2007). Persistent criminality and career length. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 133-155.
16.
HeilbrunK.BrockW.WaiteD.LanierA.SchmidM.WitteG.. . . ShumateM. (2000). Risk factors for juvenile criminal recidivism: The postrelease community adjustment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 275-291.
17.
JosiD.SechrestD. (1999). A pragmatic approach to parole aftercare: Evaluation of a community reintegration program for high-risk youthful offenders. Justice Quarterly, 16(1), 51-80.
18.
LattimoreP.MacDonaldJ.PiqueroA.LinsterR.VisherC. (2004). Studying the characteristics of arrest frequency among paroled youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), 37-57.
19.
LattimoreP.VisherC.LinsterR. (1995). Predicting rearrest for violence among serious youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(1), 54-83.
20.
LipseyM.DerzonJ. (1999). Predictors of violent or serious delinquents in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
MearsD. (1998). Evaluation issues confronting juvenile justice sentencing reforms: A case study of Texas. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 443-463.
22.
ParkerJ.MortonT.LingefeltM.JohnsonK. (2005). Predictors of serious and violent offending by adjudicated male adolescents. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 407-418.
23.
PiqueroA. R.BrameR.LynamD. (2004). Studying criminal career length through early adulthood among serious offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 412-435.
24.
PiqueroA.BrameR.MazerolleP.HaapanenR. (2002). Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology, 40, 137-169.
25.
PodkopaczM.FeldB. (2001). The back-door to prison: Waiver reform, blended sentencing, and the law of unintended consequences. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91, 997-1071.
26.
RyanJ.DavisR.YangH. (2001). Reintegration services and the likelihood of adult imprisonment: A longitudinal study of adjudicated delinquents. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 321-337.
27.
SampsonR.LaubJ. (1993). Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SampsonR.LaubJ. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555-592.
29.
SmallheerR. (1999). Sentence blending and the promise of rehabilitation: Bringing the juvenile justice system full circle. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 259-289.
30.
SnyderH.SickmundM. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31.
TrulsonC.MarquartJ.MullingsJ.CaetiT. (2005). In between adolescence and adulthood: Recidivism outcomes of a cohort of state delinquents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3, 355-387.
32.
WeibushR. G.WagnerD.McNultyB.WangY.LeT. (2005). Implementation and outcome evaluation of the intensive aftercare program: Final report. Washington, DC: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
33.
ZimringF. (2005). American juvenile justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
