This study uses Justice Stewart’s “faceless, undifferentiated mass” thesis to examine differences between defendants sentenced to death and life without parole. We argue that important differences between defendants may be revealed through the victim-offender relationship and other case-level attributes. The study uses 1,310 first degree murder defendants from Florida that were sentenced to either death or life without parole. Logistic regression was used to examine the victim-offender relationship and case-level attributes including race and gender. There are important differences between these defendants with respect to gender, age, and the victim-offender relationship. The “faceless, undifferentiated mass thesis” offers a new avenue for examining the victim-offender relationship. The implications for research will be discussed.
AndresenM. (2015). Predicting local crime clusters using (multinomial) logistic regression. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 17(3), 249–261.
2.
Atkins v.Virginia 536 US 304 (2002).
3.
BaldusD.PulaskiC.WoodworthG. (1983). Comparative review of death sentences: An empirical study of the Georgia experience. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 661–753.
4.
BartusT. (2005). Estimation of marginal effects using Margeff. The Stata Journal, 5(3), 309–329.
5.
BenincasaB. (2014). Protecting our children: A reformation of South Carolina’s Homicide by Child Abuse Laws. South Carolina Law Review, 65, 735–768.
6.
BjerregaardB.SmithM. D.CochranJ.FogelS. (2017). A further examination of the liberation hypothesis in capital murder trials. Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 1017–1038.
7.
ButtonW. (2013). What about failure to protect: Why current homicide doctrine falls short of holding parents who fail to protect their children accountable. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 22, 693–727.
8.
Buyukcan-TetikA.FickenauerC.SiersemaM.Vander HeydenK.KrabbendamL. (2015). Social relations model analyses of perceived self-control and trust in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 209–223.
9.
CainesM.BrownW.2023. Victim and offender race and the likelihood of weapon use: A test of racial animosity and racial threat theories. Criminal Justice Studies, 36(2), 184–201.
10.
CaoL.HouC.HuangB. (2007). Correlates of the victim-offender relationship in homicide. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(6), 658–672.
11.
CauffmanE.FineA.MahlerA.SimmonsC. (2018). How developmental science influences juvenile justice reform. UC Irvine Law Review, 8, 21–40.
12.
ChristieN. (2018). The ideal victim. In DugganM. (Ed.), Revisiting the “ideal victim”: Developments in critical criminology (pp. 11–23). Bristol University Press.
13.
CurtisL. (1974). Victim precipitation and violent crimes. Social Problems, 21(4), 594–605.
14.
D’AlessioS.StolzenbergL. (2009). Racial animosity and interracial crime. Criminology, 47(1), 269–296.
15.
D’AlessioS.StolzenbergL. (2010). The sex ratio and male-on-female intimate partner violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 555–561.
16.
DawsonM. (2004). Rethinking the boundaries of intimacy at the end of the century: The role of victim-defendant relationship in criminal justice decision making over time. Law & Society Review, 38(1), 105–138.
17.
DawsonM. (2006). Intimacy and violence: Exploring the role of victim-defendant relationships in criminal law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 96(4), 1417–1450.
18.
DawsonM.SuttonD. (2017). Similar sentences, similar crimes? Using deep sample analysis to examine the comparability of homicides and punishments by victim-offender relationship. International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, 49(1), 58–70.
19.
DeckerS. (1993). Exploring victim-offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 10(4), 585–612.
20.
DeckerS. (1996). Deviant homicide: A new look at the role of motives and victim-offender relationships. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(4), 427–449.
21.
DennoD. (1986). Victim, offender, and situational characteristics of violent crime. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 77(4), 1142–1158.
22.
Deslauriers-VarinN.BeauregardE. (2010). Victims’ routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent class analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(3), 315–342.
23.
DichterT. (2021). Worst of the worst: Rehabilitationist roots of life without parole. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 17(3), 529–549.
24.
DonohueJ. (2014). An empirical evaluation of the Connecticut death penalty system since 1973: Are there unlawful racial, gender, and geographic disparities?Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 637–696.
25.
DuncanH. (2022). Youth always matters: Replacing Eighth Amendment pseudo-science with an age-based ban on juvenile life without parole. Yale Law Journal, 131, 1936–2019.
26.
ErickssonL.MazerroleP.WortleyR.JohnsonH.McPhedranS. (2019). The men offending histories of homicide offenders: Are men who kill intimate partners distinct from men who kill other men?Psychology of Violence, 9(4), 471.
27.
FelsonM.MessnerS. (1998). Disentangling the effects of gender and intimacy on victim precipitation in homicide. Criminology, 36(2), 405–423.
28.
FinkelhorD.AsdigianN. (1996). Risk factors for youth victimization: Beyond a Lifestyle/Routine Activities Theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 1996.
29.
FohringS. (2018). Revisiting the non-ideal victim. In DugganM. (Ed.), Revisiting the “ideal victim” (pp. 195–210). Policy Press.
30.
Fordv.Wainwright 477 US 399 (1986).
31.
FoxJ. A.SwattM. (2009). Multiple imputation of the supplemental homicide reports, 1976-2005. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 51–77.
32.
GarrettB.Seale-CarlisleT.ModjadidiK.RenberyK. (2021). Life without parole sentencing in North Carolina. North Carolina Law Review, 99, 279–332.
33.
GirgentiA. (2015). The intersection of victim race and gender: The “black male victim effect” and the death penalty. Race and Justice, 5(4), 307–329.
34.
GreenleeH.GreenleeS. (2008). Women and the death penalty: Racial disparities and differences. William & Mary Journal of Women and Law, 14, 319–335.
35.
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
36.
GruenewaldJ.KelleyK. (2014). Exploring anti-LGBT homicide by mode of victim selection. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(9), 1130–1152.
37.
GruenewaldJ.AllisonK. (2018). Examining differences in bias homicide across victim groups. Crime & Delinquency, 64(3), 316–341.
38.
HarrellE. (2012). Violent victimization committed by strangers, 1993-2010. U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
HessickC. (2007). Violence between lovers, strangers, and friends. Washington University Law Review, 85, 343–407.
40.
HessickC.BermanD. (2016). Towards a theory of mitigation. Boston University Law Review, 96, 161–218.
41.
JohfreS.FreeseJ. (2021). Reconsidering the reference category. Sociological Methodology, 51(2), 253–269.
42.
JohnsonB.SpohnC.KimchiA. (2021). Life lessons: Examining sources of racial and ethnic disparity in federal life without parole sentences. Criminology, 59, 704–737.
43.
JohnsonS. (2020). The influence of Latino ethnicity on the imposition of the death penalty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 421–431.
44.
KawarC.CoppolaJ.GangammaR. (2019). A contextual perspective on associations between reported parental infidelity and relational ethics of the adult children. Journal of marital and Family Therapy, 42(5), 354–363.
45.
KlebanH.ChesinM.JeglicE.MercadoC. (2012). An exploration of crossover sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 25(5), 427–443.
46.
KleinstuberR.GoldsmithJ. (2020). Is life without parole an effective way to reduce crime? An empirical assessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 19, 617–651.
47.
KleinstuberR.ZayowskiH.McDonoughC. (2020). ‘Ideal victims’ in capital penalty hearings: An assessment of victim impact evidence and sentencing outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 93–109.
48.
KnappM.WilleyR. (2016). Comparison of research speed and accuracy using WestlawNext and Lexi Advance. Legal reference Services Quarterly, 34(2), 124–134.
49.
KremlingJ.SmithM. D.CochranJ.BjerregaardB.FogelS. (2007). The role of mitigating factors in capital sentencing before and after McKoy v. North Carolina. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 357–381.
50.
LeeC. (2007). Hispanics and the death penalty: Discriminatory charging practices in San Joaquin County, California. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 17–27.
51.
LeeM.MartinezR.RodriguezS. (2000). Contrasting Latinos in homicide research: The victim and offender relationship in El Paso and Miami. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 375–388.
52.
Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).
53.
LoftinC.KindleyK.NorrisS.WiersemaB. (1987). An attribute approach to relationships between offenders and victims in homicide. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78(2), 259–270.
54.
MarceauJ.KaminS.FogliaW. (2013). Death eligibility in Colorado: Many are called, few are chosen. University of Colorado Law Review, 84, 1069–1115.
55.
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
56.
MeixnerB. (2022). Modern sentencing mitigation. Northwestern University Law review, 116, 2–62.
57.
MessingJ.HeerenJ. (2009). Gendered justice: Domestic homicide and the death penalty. Feminist Criminology, 4(2), 170–188.
58.
MessnerS.SavolainenJ. (2001). Gender and the victim-offender relationship in homicide: A comparison of Finland and the United States. International Criminal Justice Review, 11, 34–57.
59.
MessnerS.DeaneG.BeaulieuM. (2002). A log-multiplicative association model for allocating homicides with unknown victim-offender relationships. Criminology, 40(2), 457–480.
60.
MietheT. (1987). Stereotypical conceptions and criminal processing: The case of the victim-offender relationship. Justice Quarterly, 4(4), 571–593.
61.
Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012).
62.
MogulJ. (2005). The dykier, the butcher, the better: The state’s use of homophobia and sexism to execute women in the United States. City University of New York Law Review, 8(2), 473–493.
63.
Montgomery v. Alabama, 577 U.S. 190 (2016).
64.
MoodC. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.
65.
MorganS.TeachmanJ. (1988). Logistic regression: Description, examples, and comparisons. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(4), 929–926.
66.
O’HearM.WheelockD. (2021). Life “with” or “without”? An empirical study of homicide sentencing. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 18(2), 377–420.
67.
OshoG.WilliamsF. (2013). An investigation of offender and victim relationships in a sample of juvenile homicides in California. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(1), 185–194.
68.
PedneaultA.BeauregardE.HarrisD.KnightR. (2014). Rationally irrational: The case of sexual burglary. Sexual Abuse, 27(4), 376–397.
69.
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
70.
PrattT.TuranovicJ. (2016). Lifestyle and routine activity theories revisited: The importance of “risk” to the study of victimization. Victims & Offenders, 11(3), 335–354.
71.
Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976).
72.
QuinetK.NunnS. (2014). Establishing the victim-offender relationship of initially unsolved homicides: Partner, family, acquaintance, or family. Homicide Studies, 18(3), 271–297.
73.
RegoecziW.MietheT. (2003). Taking on the unknown: A qualitative comparative analysis of unknown relationship homicides. Homicide Studies, 7(3), 211–234.
74.
RegoecziW.RiedelM. (2003). The application of missing data estimation models to the problem of unknown victim/offender relationships in homicide cases. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(2), 155–183.
75.
RichardsT.JenningsW.SmithM. D.SellersC.FogelS. J.BjerregaardB. (2016). Explaining the “female victim effect” in capital punishment: An examination of victim sex-specific models of juror sentence decision-making. Crime & Delinquency, 62(7), 875–898.
76.
RiedelM. (1987). Stranger violence: Perspectives, issues, and problems. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78(2), 223–258.
77.
RiedelM.RegoecziW. (2004). Missing data in homicide research. Homicide Studies, 8(3), 163–192.
78.
RoseS.EngelD.CramerN.CowleyW. (2010). Automatic keyword extraction for individual documents. In BerryM.KoganJ. (Eds.), Text mining: Applications and theory (pp. 1–20). Wiley.
79.
SchultzL. (1968). The victim-offender relationship. Crime & Delinquency, 14(2), 135–141.
80.
ShatzS.ShatzN. (2012). Chivalry is not dead: Murder, gender, and the death penalty. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 27, 64–112.
81.
SharonC. (2011). The “most deserving” of death: The narrowing requirement and the proliferation of aggravating factors in capital sentencing statutes. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 46, 223–251.
82.
SiegelM.NegussieY.VanntureS.PleskunasJ.RossC.KingC. (2014). The relationship between gun ownership and stranger and non-stranger firearm homicide rates in the United States, 1981-2010. American Journal of Public Health, 104(10), 1912–1919.
83.
SilvermanR.KennedyL. (1987). Relational distance and homicide: The role of the stranger. Journal of Criminal law and Criminology, 78(2), 272–308.
84.
SimonL. M. (2005). Comparing incarcerated homicide offenders and non-homicide violent offenders using personal interviews. Homicide Research: Past, Present, and Future, 225.
85.
SmithM. D.ParkerR. (1980). Types of homicide and variation in regional rates. Social Forces, 50(1), 136–147.
SpohnC.St. GeorgeS. (2023). Women lifers: What the United States Sentencing Commission data tell us about women eligible for and sentenced to life without parole. Victims & Offenders, 18, 1425–1445.
88.
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).
89.
StreibV. (2002). Gendering the death penalty: Countering sex bias in a masculine sanctuary. Ohio State Law Journal, 63, 433–474.
90.
SundbyS. (2003). The capital jury and empathy: The problem of worthy and unworthy victims. Cornell Law Review, 88, 343–381.
91.
TaylorS. (2022). Unfounding the ideal victim: Does Christies ideal victim explain police response to intimate partner sexual assault?Violence and Victims, 37, 201–221.
92.
ThomsonE. (1997). Discrimination and the death penalty in Arizona. Criminal Justice Review, 2291, 65–76.
93.
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
94.
ThreadcraftS.MillerL. (2017). Black women, victimization, and the limitations of the liberal state. Theoretical Criminology, 21(4), 478–493.
95.
ToohyK.ReckenwaldA.PeeblesC.FordJ. (2023). The association between resources, accessibility, and female intimate partner homicide at the county-level in Florida. Violence Against Women. 29(11), 2147–2169.
96.
TuranovicJ.PrattT.PiqueroA. (2018). Structural constraints, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 251–274.
97.
Van WijkJ. (2012). Who is the “little old lady” of international crimes? Nils Christie’s concept of the ideal victim reinterpreted. International Review of Victimology, 19(2), 1–21.
98.
VieraitisL.KovandzicT.BritoS. (2008). Women’s status and risk of homicide victimization: An analysis with data disaggregated by victim-offender relationship. Homicide Studies, 12(2), 163–176.
99.
VitoA.VitoG.HigginsG. (2021). Examining the sentence of life without parole in Kentucky homicide cases. Justice Evaluation Journal, 4(1), 98–111.
100.
VitoA.VitoG.HigginsG. (2022). The gender gap in attitudes toward capital punishment and life without parole (LWOP) in Kentucky. Women & Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2022.2126745
101.
WadsworthT.RobertsJ. (2008). When missing data are not missing: A new approach to evaluating supplemental homicide report imputation strategies. Criminology, 46(4), 841–870.
102.
WilliamsM.HolcombJ. (2004). The interactive effects of victim race and gender on death sentence disparity findings. Homicide Studies, 8(4), 350–376.
103.
WolfgangM. (1957). Victim precipitated criminal homicide. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48(1), 1–11.
104.
Woodsonv. North Carolina 428 US 280 (1976).
105.
ZahnM.SagiP. (1987). Stranger homicide in nine American cities. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78(2), 377–397.
106.
ZaykowskiH.KleinstuberR.McDonoughC. (2014). Judicial narratives of ideal and deviant victims in judges’ capital sentencing decisions. AmericanJournal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 716–731.
