In the case of Miller v. Alabama, the US Supreme Court held that mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles constituted a violation of the Eighth Amendment provision against cruel and unusual punishment. This case, along with other recently decided cases, appears to mark a shift in policy away from adultification of juveniles and toward a more rehabilitative philosophy. This article contains an analysis of three Supreme Court holdings, a review of Supreme Court rationale in reaching these decisions, and an analysis of the legislative changes that have occurred since Miller was decided.
Arredondo v. State, Case No. 04-12-0278 (Texas Ct. Appeals 4th Cir. 2013).
2.
Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. ___ (slip opinion) (2010).
3.
Hill v. Snyder, Case No. 10-14568 (U.S. Dist Ct. Eastern District, 2013).
4.
In re Gault 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
5.
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).
6.
Jackson v. Hobbs, Case No. 10-9647 (S. Ct., AR 2012).
7.
Johnson v. U.S., 720 F. 3d 720 (8th Cir. 2013).
8.
Jones v. State of Mississippi, Case No. 2009-CT-02033 (S. Ct., MS 2013).
9.
Kent v. U.S. 383 U.S. 541 (1966).
10.
Miller v. Alabama. 567 U.S. ___ (2012); 132 S. Ct., 2455.
11.
People v. Caballero, Case No. S190647 (S. Ct., CA 2012).
12.
People v. Morfin, Case No. 103568 (1st App. Ct., IL 2012).
13.
People v. Williams, Case No. 111145 (1st App. Ct., IL 2012).
14.
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
15.
State v. Ragland, Case No. 10-1770 (S. Ct., IA 2012).
16.
State v. Riley, Case No. 33507 (S. Ct., CT 2013).
17.
Teague v. Lane, 489 US 288 (1989).
18.
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
19.
AberJLAtkinsMSBenlowCPBrabeckMMConleyJCDodgeKAFineMGalvanAGardnerMGeierCFJensenFEMattisJNogueraPPerryBDSchmithorstVas Amici Curiae for Miller v. Alabama. 567 U.S. ___(2012).
20.
American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, and National Association of Social Workers as Amici Curiae for Miller v Alabama. 567 U.S. ___(2012).
21.
BernardTJ (1992) The Cycle of Juvenile Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
BishopDMFrazierCE (2000) Consequences of transfer. In FaganJZimringFE (eds) The Changing Borders of Juvenile Justice: Transfer of Adolescents to the Criminal Court. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 227–276.
23.
ClarkM (2013) How will states handle juveniles sentenced to life without parole?26August. U.S.A. Today.
24.
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2007). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneve: United Nations.
EgglestonA (2007) Perceptual Punishment: The Consequences of Adult Convictions for Youth. Washington DC: Campaign for Youth Justice.
27.
EliasP (2012) Life Sentences for Juveniles: Should 2500 Serving Life without Parole be Released?The Huffington Post, 18August. Available at: www.huffingtonpost.com.
28.
FeldB (1998) Abolish the juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility and sentencing policy. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology88: 68–136.
29.
HansenB (2001) Kids in prison. The C.Q. Researcher27: 345–376.
KupchikAFaganJLibermanA (2003) Punishment, proportionality, and jurisdictional transfer of adolescent offenders: A test of the leniency gap hypothesis. Stanford Law and Policy Review14: 57–83.
32.
MerloABenekosP (2010) Is punitive juvenile justice policy declining in the United States? A critique of emergent initiatives. Youth Justice10: 3–24.
33.
MoakSWallaceL (2003) Legal changes in juvenile justice: Then and now. Journal of Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice1(3): 289–299.
34.
MulveyEPSchubertCA (2012) Transfer of Juveniles to Adult Court: Effects of a Broad Policy in One Court. Washington DC: US Department of Justice − Office of Justice Programs: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
35.
MuncieJ (2008) The ‘punitive turn’ in juvenile justice: Cultures of control and rights compliance in Western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice: An International Journal8: 107–121.
36.
ReddingRE (2010) Juvenile Transfer Laws: An Effective Deterrent to Delinquency?Washington DC: US Department of Justice − Office of Justice Programs: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
37.
SnyderHNSickmundM (2006) Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report. Washington DC: US Department of Justice − Office of Justice Programs: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
