The theory of Relative Deprivation (RD)—introduced by Walter Runciman in the late 1960s—is one of the most widely established theoretical concepts explaining political violence. Criminology has mostly abandoned RD theory despite many valuable contributions it could still make to the field. This theoretical article applies the RD theory in Ted Gurr’s version to the field of preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) practice and policy through a combination of meta-narrative and integrative literature reviews. By studying P/CVE through the lens of RD, this article demonstrates the continuous value of RD theory as a link between criminology and terrorism research on the one hand and advances evidence-based concepts in the P/CVE field on the other.
AdamsB.StahlG.ObergG. (2023). “The ideology becomes a way to make sense of that disconnection”: Beliefs, behaviour and belonging – does ideology matter in countering violent extremism?Critical Studies on Terrorism, 16(4), 648–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2023.2266951
2.
AhmadF.MonaghanJ. (2019). Mapping criminological engagements within radicalization studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(6), 1288–1308. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz023
3.
al-HadlaqA. (2015). Saudi efforts in counter-radicalisation and extremist rehabilitation. In GunaratnaR.Bin AliM. (Eds.), Terrorist rehabilitation: A new frontier in counter-terrorism (pp. 21–39). Imperial College Press.
4.
AltierM. B.Leonard BoyleE.HorganJ. G. (2021). Returning to the fight: An empirical analysis of terrorist reengagement and recidivism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(4), 836-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1679781
5.
AltierM. B.Leonard BoyleE.ShortlandN. D.HorganJ. G. (2017). Why they leave: An analysis of terrorist disengagement events from eighty-seven autobiographical accounts. Security Studies, 26(2), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1280307
6.
AltierM. B.ThoroughgoodC. N.HorganJ. G. (2014). Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology, and criminology. Journal of Peace Research, 51(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314535946
7.
BarrelleK. (2015). Pro-integration: Disengagement from and life after extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2014.988165
8.
BazemoreG. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 768–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764298041006003
9.
BélangerJ. J.Adam-TroianJ.NisaC. F.SchumpeB. M. (2022). Ideological passion and violent activism: The moderating role of the significance quest. British Journal of Psychology113, 917–937. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678112
10.
BergerJ. M. (2018). Extremism. The MIT Press.
11.
BraddockK. (2014). The talking cure? Communication and psychological impact in prison de-radicalisation programmes. In SilkeA. (Ed.), Prisons, terrorism and extremism: Critical issues in management, radicalisation and reform (pp. 60–74). Routledge.
12.
CherneyA.KoehlerD. (2023a). Understanding and addressing the risk of disguised compliance in CVE programming. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2023.2286966
13.
CherneyA.KoehlerD. (2023b). What does sustained desistance from violent extremism entail: A proposed theory of change and policy implications. Terrorism and Political Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2215348
14.
ClaassenC.AckermannK.BertsouE.BorbaL.CarlinR. E.CavariA.DahlumS.GherghinaS.HawkinsD.LelkesY.MagalhãesP. C.MattesR.MeijersM.NeundorfA.OrossD.OzturkA.SarsfieldR.SelfD.StanleyB.. . . LelkesY. (2023). Conceptualizing and measuring support for democracy: A new approach. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4622645
15.
ClaytonK.DavisN. T.NyhanB.PorterE.RyanT. J.WoodT. J. (2021). Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 118(23), e2024125118. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.2024125118
16.
ClubbG. (2015). De-radicalization, disengagement and the attitudes-behavior debate. In Kennedy-PipeC.ClubbG.MabonS. (Eds.), Terrorism and political violence (pp. 258–266). Sage.
17.
ClubbG.KoehlerD.ScheweJ.O’ConnorR. (2021). Selling de-radicalisation: Managing the media framing of countering violent extremism. Routledge.
18.
De CoenselS. (2018). Processual models of radicalization into terrorism: A best fit framework synthesis. Journal for Deradicalization, 17, 89–127.
19.
DeanC. (2014). The healthy identity intervention: The UK’s development of a psychologically informed intervention to address extremist offending. In SilkeA. (Ed.), Prisons, terrorism and extremism: Critical issues in management, radicalisation and reform’ (pp. 89–107). Routledge.
20.
DoosjeB.van den BosK.LosemanA.FeddesA. R.MannL. (2012). “My in-group is superior!”: Susceptibility for radical right-wing attitudes and behaviors in Dutch Youth. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2012.00099.x
21.
EastonD. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.
22.
GurrT. R. (2016). Why men rebel (40th Anniversary Edition ed.). Routledge.
23.
HansenS. J.LidS. (2020). Routledge handbook of deradicalisation and disengagement. Routledge.
24.
HarpvikenA. N. (2020). Psychological vulnerabilities and extremism among western youth: A literature review. Adolescent Research Review, 5(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00108-y
25.
HassanG.Brouillette-AlarieS.OusmanS. (2023). Risk for violent radicalization: Do primary, secondary and tertiary prevention programmes effectively address risk and protective factors? In LoganC.BorumR.GillP. (Eds.), Violent risk assessment: A handbook of risk assessment and management (pp. 179–212). UCL Press.
26.
HorganJ. (2009). Individual disengagement: A psychological analysis. In BjørgoT.HorganJ. (Eds.), Leaving terrorism behind: Individual and collective disengagement (pp. 17–29). Routledge.
27.
HorganJ.BraddockK. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists? Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546551003594748
28.
JuglI. (2022). Breaking up the Bubble: Improving critical thinking skills and tolerance of ambiguity in deradicalization mentoring. Journal for Deradicalization, 30, 45–80.
KingM.TaylorD. M. (2011). The radicalization of homegrown Jihadists: A review of theoretical models and social psychological evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(4), 602–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2011.587064
31.
KoehlerD. (2016). Understanding deradicalization. Methods, tools and programs for countering violent extremism. Routledge.
KoehlerD. (2019). Involvement of formers in countering violent extremism: A critical perspective on commonly held assumptions. In WalshM.GansewigA. (Eds.), Frühere Extremisten in der Präventionsarbeit. Perspektiven aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 15–22). Nationales Zentrum Kriminalprävention.
34.
KoehlerD. (2020). Terminology and definitions. In HansenS. J.LidS. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of deradicalisation and disengagement (pp. 11–25). Routledge.
35.
KoehlerD.CherneyA.TemplarA. (2023). Truth or dare? Exploring the importance of factual accuracy in different deradicalization counseling approaches. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2256535
36.
KoehlerD.FiebigV. (2019). Knowing what to do: Academic and practitioner understanding of how to counter violent radicalization. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(3), 44–62.
37.
KoomenW.PligtJ. v. d. (2016). The psychology of radicalization and terrorism. Routledge.
38.
KunstJ. R.DovidioJ. F.ThomsenL. (2019). Fusion with political leaders predicts willingness to persecute immigrants and political opponents. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(11), 1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0708-1
39.
KunstJ. R.ObaidiM. (2020). Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: The (re) emerging role of relative deprivation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 55–59.
LaFreeG.FreilichJ. D. (2017). The handbook of the criminology of terrorism. Wiley-Blackwell.
42.
LaFreeG.MillerE. (2008). Desistance from terrorism: What can we learn from criminology?Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 1(3), 203–230.
43.
LeaJ.YoungJ. (1984). What is to be done about law and order?Penguin Books.
44.
MaleševićS. (2022). Why humans fight: The social dynamics of close-range violence. Cambridge University Press.
45.
McEvoyL.McEvoyK.McConnachieK. (2006). Reconciliation as a dirty word: Conflict, community relations and education in Northern Ireland. Journal of International Affairs, 60, 81–106.
46.
MertonR. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
47.
MillaM. N.YustisiaW.ShadiqiM. A.ArifinH. H. (2022). Mechanisms of 3N model on radicalization: Testing the mediation by group identity and ideology of the relationship between need for significance and violent extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2022.2034231
MulukH.UmamA. N.MillaM. N. (2020). Insights from a deradicalization program in Indonesian prisons: The potential benefits of psychological intervention prior to ideological discussion. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12392
52.
NewmanB.MerollaJ. L.ShahS.LemiD. C.CollingwoodL.RamakrishnanS. K. (2021). The trump effect: An experimental investigation of the emboldening effect of racially inflammatory elite communication. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000590
53.
NoorM.HalabiS. (2018). Can we forgive a militant outgroup member? The role of perspective-taking. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 246–255. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/ajsp.12328
54.
ObaidiM.BerghR.AkramiN.AnjumG. (2019). Group-based relative deprivation explains endorsement of extremism among Western-born Muslims. Psychological Science, 30(4), 596–605.
55.
OhlsI.HosseiniD. S.SpasojevicA.BrandesF.BajwaR.AhmedK.GallinatJ.KarowA.AllroggenM. (2023). A systematic review of the risk and protective factors for processes associated with Islamist radicalization and extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2243349
56.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . . BrennanS. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906.
RaetsS. (2024). Desistance, disengagement, and deradicalization: A cross-field comparison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 68, 389–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x221102802
59.
RigoliF. (2023). Political extremism and a generalized propensity to discriminate among values. Political Psychology, 44, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12839
60.
RuncimanW. G. H. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England (pp. xiv. 338). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
61.
SaramoS. (2017). The meta-violence of Trumpism. European Journal of American Studies, 12, 2.
62.
ScheweJ.KoehlerD. (2021). When healing turns to activism: Formers and family members’ motivation to engage in P/CVE. Journal for Deradicalization, 28, 141–182.
63.
SilkeA.MorrisonJ.MaibergH.SlayC.StewartR. (2021). The Phoenix model of disengagment and deradicalisation from terrorism and violent extremism. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0128
64.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232.
StackS. (1984). Income inequality and property crime: A cross-national analysis of relative deprivation theory. Criminology, 22(2), 229–256.
67.
StoufferS. A.SuchmanE. A.DevinneyL. C.StarS. A.WilliamsR. MJr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. (Studies in social psychology in World War II) (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
68.
SydesM.HineL.HigginsonA.McEwanJ.DuganL.MazerolleL. (2023). Criminal justice interventions for preventing radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism: An evidence and gap map. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(4), e1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1366
ThompsonS. K.LerouxE. (2023). Lessons learned from dual site formative evaluations of Countering violent extremism (CVE) programming co-led by Canadian police. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 18(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2022.2040741
71.
TorcalM.MoncagattaP. (2011). Support, political. In BadieB.Berg-SchlosserD.MorlinoL. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of political science (pp. 2564–2567). Sage.
72.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
73.
TripS.BoraC. H.MarianM.HalmajanA.DrugasM. I. (2019). Psychological mechanisms involved in radicalization and extremism. A rational emotive behavioral conceptualization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 437.
74.
TurnerJ. C.TajfelH. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5, 7–24.
75.
Van den BosK. (2020). Unfairness and radicalization. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 563–588.
76.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504.
77.
VarmannA. H.KruseL.BierwiaczonekK.GómezÁ.VázquezA.KunstJ. R. (2024). How identity fusion predicts extreme pro-group orientations: A meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 35, 162–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2023.2190267
78.
VoelkelJ. G.ChuJ.StagnaroM. N.MernykJ. S.RedekoppC.PinkS. L.DruckmanJ. N.RandD. G.WillerR. (2022). Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01466-9
von LautzY.BösingE.KartM.SteinM. (2023). Counseling towards the deradicalization of Islamist extremists: An overview of approaches based on two qualitative interview studies with prevention practitioners in Germany. Journal for Deradicalization, 36, 23–63.
81.
WalshM.GansewigA. (2019). A former right-wing extremist in school-based prevention work: Research findings from Germany. JD Journal for Deradicalization, 21, 1–42.
82.
WebberC. (2022). Rediscovering the relative deprivation and crime debate: Tracking its fortunes from left realism to the precariat. Critical Criminology, 30(2), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09554-4
WilliamsM. J. (2017). Prosocial behavior following immortality priming: Experimental tests of factors with implications for CVE interventions. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 9(3), 153–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2016.1186718
85.
WolfowiczM.LitmanovitzY.WeisburdD.HasisiB. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3), e1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1174
