Social Context and Early Disposition Departures: An Examination of Disparity in Immigration Sentencing Across U.S. District Courts

Abstract

In the 1990s, the United States Attorneys’ Offices implemented programs to make sentencing for immigration offenses more efficient by designating a number of “Fast-Track” districts. In 2012, these programs were expanded to all federal districts. Using data from multiple sources including federal sentencing data from 2015 to 2016 and community-level variables from the American Community Survey, this study examines how individual and district-level characteristics affect receipt and magnitude of early disposition departures. Findings suggest Hispanic population, Republican Control, and original fast-track district predict early disposition departure receipt and sentence length. District-level characteristics can influence when and how these departures are used.

Keywords

federal sentencing immigration disparity social context political climate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266.

American Immigration Council. (2011). Understanding prosecutorial discretion in immigration law. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/understanding-prosecutorial-discretion-immigration-law

Baumer

E. P.

Martin

K. H.

(2013). Social organization, collective sentiment, and legal sanctions in murder cases. American Journal of Sociology, 119(1), 131–182.

Bibas

(2005). Regulating local variations in federal sentencing. Stanford Law Review, 58, 137–154.

Bolla

E. W.

(2006). An unwarranted disparity: Granting fast-track departures in non-fast-track districts. Cardozo Law. Review, 28, 895–930.

Brady

P. Q.

Reyns

B. W.

(2020). A focal concerns perspective on prosecutorial decision making in cases of intimate partner stalking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 733–748.

Bucerias

S. M.

Tonry

(2013). The Oxford handbook of ethnicty, crime, and immigration. Oxford University Press.

Cho

(2010). Lowering sentences for illegal immigrants: Why judges should have discretion to vary from the guidelines based on fast-track sentencing disparities. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 43(4), 447–490.

Congressional Research Service. (2023). Immigration-related criminal offenses. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11410#:~:text=%281%29%20improper%20entry%20and%20reentry%3B%20%282%29%20smuggling%2C,transporting%2C%20and%20harboring%20aliens%3B%20and%20%283%29%20immigration-related%20fraud

10.

Crow

M. S.

Goulette

(2023). Sex, politics, and US District Court outcomes: Examining variation in judge-initiated downward guideline departures. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 295–318.

11.

Demuth

(2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41(3), 873–908.

12.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 1–27.

13.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(2), 242–269.

14.

Durante

K. A.

(2021). County-level context and sentence lengths for Black, Latinx, and White individuals sentenced to prison: A multi-level assessment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(9), 915–937.

15.

Feldmeyer

Ulmer

J. T.

(2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 238–270.

16.

Franklin

T. W.

Henry

T. K. S.

(2020). Racial disparities in federal sentencing outcomes: Clarifying the role of criminal history. Crime & Delinquency, 66(1), 3–32.

17.

Freiburger

T. L.

Romain

(2018). An examination of the impacts of gender, race, and ethnicity on the judicial processing of offenders in family violence cases. Crime & Delinquency, 64(13), 1663–1697.

18.

Freiburger

T. L.

Sheeran

A. M.

(2020). The joint effects of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on the incarceration and sentence length decisions. Race and Justice, 10(2), 203–222.

19.

Garland

(2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.

20.

Gelman

Hill

(2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.

21.

Gorman

T. E.

(2009). A history of fast-track sentencing. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 21(5), 311–317.

22.

Harteveld

Kokkonen

Dahlberg

(2017). Adapting to party lines: The effect of party affiliation on attitudes to immigration. West European Politics, 40(6), 1177–1197.

23.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2012). Defending the homeland: Judicial sentencing practices for federal immigration offenses. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 77–104.

24.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2018). Examining prosecutorial discretion in federal criminal cases: Legal and extra-legal determinants of declination and charge change decisions. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1195–1225.

25.

Hawkins

D. F.

(1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2(3), 207–230.

26.

Helms

Costanza

S. E.

(2010). Modeling the politics of punishment: A contextual analysis of racial disparity in drug sentencing. Criminal Justice Review, 35(4), 472–491.

27.

Hester

(2017). Judicial rotation as centripetal force: Sentencing in the court communities of South Carolina. Criminology, 55(1), 205–235.

28.

Hofer

P. J.

(2011). Has Booker restored balance? A look at data on plea bargaining and sentencing. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 23(5), 326–332.

29.

Hofer

P. J.

(2019). Federal sentencing after Booker. Crime and Justice, 48(1), 137–186.

30.

Holland

M. M.

(2020). Fast-tracking justice: An examination of the role of gender in the application of federal early disposition decisions and other departure outcomes for immigration offenses. Women & Criminal Justice, 30(2), 126–146.

31.

Holmes

Feldmeyer

(2019). Reassessing the influence of criminal history in federal criminal courts. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1206–1228.

32.

Holmes

Feldmeyer

Kulig

T. C.

(2020). Sentencing departures and focal concerns: The joint effect of race and gender on departures in United States district courts, 2014–2016. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(5), 598–622.

33.

Jones

Z. T.

(2012). Prescribing disproportionate punishment: The federal sentencing guidelines for illegal reentry. Cardozo Law Review, 33(3), 1217–1251.

34.

Kim

(2013). Organizational efficiency and early disposition programs in federal courts. Urban Institute.

35.

Koons-Witt

B. A.

(2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40(2), 297–328.

36.

Light

M. T.

Massagolia

King

R. D.

(2014). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national nembership in US criminal courts. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 825–847.

37.

Logue

M. A.

(2009). The price of being Mexican: Sentencing disparities between noncitizen Mexican and non-Mexican Latinos in the federal courts. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31(4), 423–445.

38.

Nowacki

J. S.

(2017). An intersectional approach to race/ethnicity, sex, and age disparity in federal sentencing outcomes: An examination of policy across time periods. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(1), 97–116.

39.

Pew Research Center. (2020). Facts on U.S. immigrants, 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2020/08/20/facts-on-u-s-immigrants/

40.

Rehavi

M. M.

Starr

S. B.

(2014). Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1320–1354.

41.

Ridgeway

Moyer

R. A.

Bushway

S. D.

(2020). Sentencing scorecards: Reducing racial disparities in prison sentences at their source. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(4), 1113–1138.

42.

St. Louis

. (2022). Bail denied or bail too high? Disentangling cumulative disadvantage by pretrial detention type. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, 101971.

43.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2001). Ethnicity and judges sentencing decisions: Hispanic-Black-White comparisons. Criminology, 39(1), 145–178.

44.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705–729.

45.

Steffensmeier

D. J.

(1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26(3), 344–357.

46.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.

47.

Steffensmeier

Painter-Davis

Ulmer

(2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833.

48.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.

49.

Tillyer

Hartley

(2016). The use and impact of fast-track departures: Exploring prosecutorial and judicial discretion in federal immigration cases. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1624–1647.

50.

Tonry

(1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America. Oxford University Press.

51.

Tonry

M. H.

(2016). Sentencing fragments: Penal reform in America, 1975-2025. Oxford University Press.

52.

Tonry

M. H.

(1997). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.

53.

Ulmer

J. T.

Light

M. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(2011). Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(4), 873–1155.

54.

Ulmer

J. T.

Parker

B. R.

(2020). Federal sentencing of Hispanic defendants in changing immigrant destinations. Justice Quarterly, 37(3), 541–570.

55.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2012). Department policy on early disposition or ‘fast track’ programs. https://www.justice.gov/

56.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2023). Speedy Trial Act of 1974. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-628-speedy-trial-act-1974

57.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2012). Quick facts: Illegal reentry offenses.

58.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2013). Quick facts: Illegal reentry offenses.

59.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2014). Quick facts: Illegal reentry offenses.

60.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2015a). Amendment 802. https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/amendment/802

61.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2015b). Quick facts: Illegal reentry offenses.

62.

Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (1994). H.R. 3355.

63.

Vito

A. G.

Grossi

E. L.

Higgins

G. E.

(2017). The issue of racial profiling in traffic stop citations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(4), 431–450.

64.

Weber

(2012). Fast-track sentencing. Missouri Law Review, 77(4), 1227–1251.

65.

West

B. T.

Welch

K. B.

Galecki

A. T.

(2022). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

66.

White

S. C.

(2011). The good, the bad, the disparate. Brooklyn Law Review, 76, 867–899.