Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Labeled the model minority, Asian Americans have been seen as less discriminated against than other racial/ethnic minorities in the different aspects of American society. Sentencing scholarship also revealed robust evidence that Asian offenders were not treated differently from White offenders in judicial decision making. Some research even found the most favorable sentencing outcomes for Asian offenders. However, it is unclear whether the model minority hypothesis is validated when only the criminal sentencing of noncitizen offenders is at issue. Using the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s sentencing data for fiscal years 2006–2007, the present study, with a focus specifically on immigration offenses, seeks to challenge this hypothesis by examining the extent to which an offender’s national origin and race/ethnicity affect sentencing outcomes. Findings reveal strong support for our argument that the model minority advantage is offense-specific and that it is not applicable to all types of offenses. Specifically, there is no model minority advantage for non-U.S. citizens’ immigration offenses.

Keywords

race ethnicity national origin immigration disparity federal sentencing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789–822.

Asian American Justice Center. (2013). Immigration. Retrieved May 4, 2013, from http://www.advancingequality.org/immigration

Associated Press. (2006). Poll: Immigration concern rising in USA. Retrieved May 24, 2013, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-09-poll-immigration_x.htm

Bean

F. D.

Lowell

B. L

. (2007). Unauthorized migration. In Waters

M. C.

Ueda

Marrow

H. B.

(Eds.), The new Americans: A guide to immigration since 1965 (pp. 70–82). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bolla

E. W.

(2006). An unwarranted disparity: Granting fast-track departures in non-fast-track districts. Cardozo Law Review, 28, 895–930.

Bonacich

(1984a). Some basic facts: Patterns of Asian immigration and exclusion. In Cheng

Bonacich

(Eds.), Labor immigration under capitalism: Asian workers in the United States before World War II (pp. 60–78). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bonacich

(1984b). Asian labor in the development of California and Hawaii. In Cheng

Bonacich

(Eds.), Labor immigration under capitalism: Asian workers in the United States before World War II (pp. 130–185). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Breen

(1996). Regression models: Censored, sample selected, or truncated data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bridges

G. S.

(1997). A study on racial and ethnic disparities in superior court bail and pre-trial detention practices in Washington (Final report). Olympia: Washington State Minority and Justice Commission.

10.

Ceasar

. (2010). In Arizona, a stream of illegal immigrants from China. Retrieved May 24, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/23/us/23smuggle.html?_r=0

11.

Chen

E. Y.

(2008). The liberation hypothesis and racial and ethnic disparities in the application of California’s three strikes law. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6, 83–102.

12.

Chin

(1999). Smuggled Chinese: Clandestine immigration to the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

13.

Chew

P. K.

(1994). Asian Americans: The “reticent” minority and their paradoxes. William and Mary Law Review, 36, 1–94.

14.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S

. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Daniels

(1977). The politics of prejudice: The anti-Japanese movement in California and the struggle for Japanese exclusion (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

16.

Demuth

(2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, black, and white felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873–908.

17.

Demuth

Steffensmeier

(2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in felony cases: Comparisons among white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994–1011.

18.

Engen

R. L.

Gainey

R. R.

(2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207–1229.

19.

Engen

R. L.

Gainey

R. R.

Steen

(1999). The impact of race and ethnicity on charging and sentencing processes for drug offenders in three counties of Washington State. Olympia: Washington State Minority and Justice Commission.

20.

Engen

R. L.

Steen

(2000). The power to punish: Discretion and sentencing reform in the war on drugs. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1357–1395.

21.

Everett

R. S.

Nienstedt

B. C.

(1999). Race, remorse, and sentence reduction: Is saying you’re sorry enough? Justice Quarterly, 16, 99–122.

22.

Everett

R. S.

Wojtkiewicz

R. A.

(2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189–211.

23.

Feldmeyer

Ulmer

J. T.

(2011). Race/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 238–270.

24.

Fishman

L. T.

(2006). The black bogeyman and white self- righteousness. In Mann

C. R.

Zatz

M. S.

Rodriguez

(Eds.), Images of color, images of crime: Readings (pp. 197–211). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

25.

Franklin

T. W.

Fearn

N. E

. (in press). Sentencing Asian offenders in state courts: The influence of a prevalent stereotype. Crime and Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0011128710386200

26.

Friedman

L. M.

(1993). Crime and punishment in American history. New York, NY: BasicBooks.

27.

Gaines

L. K.

(2006). An analysis of traffic stop data in Riverside, California. Police Quarterly, 9, 210–233.

28.

Greenwald

H. P.

(2001). Final report: Police vehicle stops in Sacramento, California. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

29.

Guichard

C. P.

Connolly

M. A.

(1977). Ethnic group stereotypes: A new look at an old problem. Journal of Negro Education, 46, 344–356.

30.

Hamm

M. S.

(2006). The laundering of white crime. In Mann

C. R.

Zatz

M. S.

Rodriguez

(Eds.), Images of color, images of crime: Readings (pp. 231–242). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

31.

Harrington

M. P.

Spohn

(2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36–63.

32.

Hartley

R. D.

Armendariz

L. F.

(2011). Border justice? Sentencing federal narcotics offenders in southwest border districts: A focus on citizenship status. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27, 43–62.

33.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2012). Defending the homeland: Judicial sentencing practices for federal immigration offenses. Justice Quarterly, 29, 76–104.

34.

Hawkins

D. F.

(1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment. Social Forces, 65, 719–745.

35.

Helms

Jacobs

(2002). The political context of sentencing: An analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81, 577–604.

36.

Hirschman

Wong

M. G.

(1986). The extraordinary educational attainment of Asian-Americans: A search for historical evidence and explanations. Social Forces, 65, 1–27.

37.

Hendricks

(2011). Asian Americans and the criminal justice system. In Hendricks

J. E.

Byers

B. D.

Warren-Gordon

(Eds.), Multicultural perspectives in criminal justice and criminology (pp. 111–143). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

38.

Hurh

W. M.

Kim

K. C.

(1989). The “success” image of Asian Americans: Its validity, and its practical and theoretical implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 12, 512–537.

39.

Huus

. (2006). Illegal Chinese immigrants land in U.S. limbo. Retrieved May 24, 2013, from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/12174500/ns/us_news-life/t/illegal-chinese-immigrants-land-us-limbo

40.

Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §1227 (1952).

41.

Johnson

B. D.

Betsinger

(2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045–1090.

42.

Johnson

B. D.

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 737–783.

43.

Kasindorf

Chin

(1982, December 6). Asian Americans: A “Model Minority.” Newsweek, 39–51.

44.

Kramer

J. H.

Ulmer

J. T.

(1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81–106.

45.

Lansdowne

W. M.

(2000). Vehicle stop demographic study. San Jose, CA: San Jose Police Department.

46.

Lee

(2002). Enforcing the borders: Chinese exclusion along the U.S. borders with Canada and Mexico, 1882-1924. Journal of American History, 89, 54–86.

47.

Lee

R. G.

(1999). Orientals: Asian Americans in popular culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

48.

Lim

Z. H

. (2013). For Asian undocumented immigrants, a life of secrecy. Retrieved May 24, 2013, from http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/for-asian-undocumented-immigrants-a-life-of-secrecy/275829

49.

Logue

M. A.

(2009). The price of being Mexican: Sentencing disparities between noncitizen Mexican and non-Mexican Latinos in the federal courts. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31, 423–445.

50.

Maxwell

C. D.

Robinson

A. L.

Post

L. A.

(2003). The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violence crimes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 523–538.

51.

McGowan

M. O.

Lindgren

(2006). Testing the “model minority myth.” Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 331–377.

52.

McNamara

Burns

(2009). Multiculturalism in the criminal justice system. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

53.

Miller

T. A.

(2005a). Blurring the boundaries between immigration and crime control after September 11th. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 25, 81–123.

54.

Miller

T. A.

(2005b). By any means necessary: Collateral civil penalties of non-U.S. citizens and the war on terror. In Mele

Miller

T. A.

(Eds.), Civil penalties, social consequences (pp. 47–66). New York, NY: Routledge.

55.

Min

P. G.

(Ed.). (1995). Asian-Americans: Contemporary trends and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

56.

Motivans

(2011). Federal justice statistics 2009—Statistical tables (BJS Publication No. NCJ-233464). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

57.

Motivans

(2012). Immigration offenders in the federal justice system, 2010 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-238581). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

58.

Mustard

D. B.

(2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 1–30.

59.

Ngai

M. M.

(2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

60.

Okihiro

G. Y.

(1991). Cane fires: The anti-Japanese movement in Hawaii, 1865-1945. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

61.

Osajima

(1988). Asian Americans and the model minority: An analysis of the popular press image in the 1960s and 1980s. In Okihiro

G. Y.

Hun

Hansen

A. A.

Liu

J. M.

(Eds.), Reflection of shattered windows: Promises and prospects for Asian American studies (pp. 165–174). Pullman: Washington State University Press.

62.

Paek

H. J.

Shah

(2003). Racial ideology, model minorities, and the “not-so-silent partner:” Stereotyping of Asian Americans in U.S. magazine advertising. Howard Journal of Communication, 14, 225–243.

63.

Pasko

(2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 307–328.

64.

Passel

J. S.

Cohen

(2011). Unauthorized immigrant population: National and state trends, 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

65.

Peffer

G. A.

(1986). Forbidden families: Emigration experiences of Chinese women under the Page Law, 1875-1882. Journal of American Ethnic History, 6, 28–46.

66.

Peterson

(1966a, January 9). Success story, Japanese-American style. New York Times, 20–21, 33, 36, 38, 40–41, 43.

67.

Peterson

(1966b, December 26). Success story of one minority group in the U.S. U.S. News & World Report, 73–78.

68.

Pew Research Center. (2013). The rise of Asian Americans. Washington, DC: Author.

69.

Portillos

E. L.

(2006). Latinos, gangs, and drugs. In Mann

C. R.

Zatz

M. S.

Rodriguez

(Eds.), Images of color, images of crime: Readings (pp. 212–220). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

70.

Reeves

T. J.

Bennett

C. E.

(2004). We the people: Asians in the United States, Census 2000 special report (CB Publication No. CENSR-17). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

71.

Rodriguez

(2003). The impact of “strikes” in sentencing decisions: Punishment for only some habitual offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 106–127.

72.

Sandmeyer

E. C.

(1991). The anti-Chinese movement in California (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

73.

Saxon

A. S.

(1971). The indispensable enemy: Labor and the anti-Chinese movement in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

74.

Scalia

(1996). Noncitizens in the federal criminal justice system, 1984-94 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-160934). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

75.

Scalia

Litras

M. F. X.

(2002). Immigration offenders in the federal criminal justice system, 2000 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-191745). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

76.

Schanzenbach

M. M.

(2005). Racial and sex disparities in prison sentences: The effect of district-level judicial demographics. Journal of Legal Studies, 34, 57–92.

77.

Spohn

C. C.

(2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Horney

(Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (Vol. 3, pp. 427–501). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

78.

Spohn

C. C.

(2005). Sentencing decisions in three U.S. district courts: Testing the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process. Justice Research and Policy, 7, 1–27.

79.

Spohn

C. C.

Brennan

P. K.

(2011). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and gender on substantial assistance departures in federal courts. Race and Justice, 1, 49–78.

80.

Spohn

C. C.

Fornango

(2009). U.S. attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 47, 813–846.

81.

Spohn

C. C.

Horney

(1993). Rape law reform and the effect of victim characteristics on case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 383–409.

82.

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. (2002). SPSS 11.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL: Author.

83.

Stat Trek. (2012). Random number generator. Retrieved August 31, 2011, from www.stattrek.com/statistics/random-number-generator.aspx

84.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705–729.

85.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sentencing: Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261.

86.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–797.

87.

Studenmund

A. H.

(1997). Using econometrics: A practical guide. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.

88.

Sue

Kitano

H. H. L.

(1973). Stereotypes as a measure of success. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 83–98.

89.

Suzuki

B. H.

(1977). Education and socialization of Asian Americans: A revisionist analysis of the “model minority” thesis. Amerasia Journal, 4, 23–51.

90.

Tran

Birman

(2010). Questioning the model minority: Studies of Asian American academic performance. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1, 106–118.

91.

Ulmer

J. T.

Eisenstein

Johnson

B. D.

(2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560–592.

92.

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996). Compendium of federal justice statistics, 1993 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-160089). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

93.

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998a). Compendium of federal justice statistics, 1994 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-163063). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

94.

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998b). Compendium of federal justice statistics, 1995 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-164259). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

95.

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998c). Compendium of federal justice statistics, 1996 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-172849). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

96.

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Compendium of federal justice statistics, 2000 (BJS Publication No. NCJ-194067). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

97.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2006). Immigration enforcement action: 2005. Washington, DC: Author.

98.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2008a). 2007 Yearbook of immigration statistics. Washington, DC: Author.

99.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2008b). Immigration enforcement action: 2006. Washington, DC: Author.

100.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2008c). Immigration enforcement action: 2007. Washington, DC: Author.

101.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011). 2010 Yearbook of immigration statistics. Washington, DC: Author.

102.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2000). 1998 Statistical yearbook of immigration and naturalization services. Washington, DC: Author.

103.

U.S. Department of Justice, Uniform Crime Reporting Program. (2010). Crime in the United States 2010: Uniform crime reports. Retrieved July 31, 2012, from www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/table-43

104.

U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2005). U.S. Sentencing Commission’s sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Washington, DC: Author.

105.

U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2006). U.S. Sentencing Commission’s sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Washington, DC: Author.

106.

U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2007a). U.S. Sentencing Commission’s sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Washington, DC: Author.

107.

U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2007b). Guidelines manual. Washington, DC: Author.

108.

Walker

Spohn

DeLone

. (2012). The color of justice: Race, ethnicity, and crime in America (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

109.

Welch

(2002). Detained: Immigration laws and the expanding I.N.S. jail complex. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

110.

Welch

(2003). Ironies of social control and the criminalization of immigrants. Crime, Law and Social Change, 39, 319–337.

111.

Wilmot

K. A.

DeLone

M. A.

(2010). Sentencing of Native Americans: A multistage analysis under Minnesota sentencing guidelines. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 8, 151–180.

112.

Wilmot

K. A.

Spohn

C. C.

(2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 324–343.

113.

Wolfe

S. E.

Pyrooz

D. C.

Spohn

C. C.

(2011). Unraveling the effect of offender citizenship status on federal sentencing outcomes. Social Science Research, 40, 349–362.

114.

Wooldredge

J. D.

Griffin

Rauschenberg

. (2005). (Un)anticipated effects of sentencing reform on the disparate treatment of defendants. Law and Society Review, 39, 835–873.

115.

(2011). Citizenship status, race, ethnicity, and their effects on sentencing. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.

116.

Spohn

C. C.

(2010). Interdistrict disparity in sentencing in three U.S. district courts. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 290–322.

117.

W. F.

(1982). The yellow peril: Chinese Americans in American fiction, 1850-1940. Hamden, CT: Archon.

The Model Minority Myth for Noncitizen Immigration Offenses and Sentencing Outcomes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References