Studies of the effects of internal procedural fairness within police departments have consistently shown that officers who report experiencing procedural fairness within their departments also support procedurally fair policing practices. In this article, I compare two theories put forth to explain this connection: the Fair Policing from the Inside Out model and the Group Engagement Model. Using a national survey of police officers, I estimate a series of nested structural equation models based on the propositions of the two models, finding that the GEM provides a better explanation for the relationship between internal and external procedural fairness, and that several of the mechanisms identified in the FPIO model are not significant factors once GEM variables are included.
AwangZ. (2012). Research methodology and data analysis (2nd ed.). UiTM Press.
3.
BanduraA. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.
4.
BladerS. L.TylerT. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(36), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203252811
5.
BladerS. L.TylerT. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
6.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
7.
BradfordB.QuintonP. (2014). Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English Constabulary. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 2013–2046.
8.
BradfordB.QuintonP.MyhillA.PorterG. (2014). Why do “the law” comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations. European Journal of Criminology, 11(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813491898
9.
BrantR. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457
10.
BryantF. B.SatorraA. (2011). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 372–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687671.
11.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods Research, 33, 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
12.
ClarkeK. A. (2005). The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22(4), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940500339183
13.
ClarkeK. A. (2009). Return of the phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in political research. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894208097666
14.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
15.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.
16.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millenium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425
17.
ColquittJ. A.GreenbergJ.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
18.
CordnerG. (2017). Police culture: Individual and organizational differences in police officer perspectives. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(1), 665–680.
19.
CrankJ. P.LangworthyR. (1992). An institutional perspective of policing. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(2), 338–364.
20.
CroninS. W.McDevittJ.CordnerG. (2017). Police supervision: Perspectives of subordinates. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(1), 26–41.
21.
DollardJ.MillerN. E.DoobL. W.MowrerO. H.SearsR. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.
22.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MaccallumR. C.StrahanE. J.WegenerD. T.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
23.
FarmerS. J.BeehrT. A.LoveK. G. (2003). Becoming an undercover police officer: A note on fairness perceptions, behavior, and attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.196
24.
GreenbergJ. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.
25.
GreenbergJ. (2011). Organizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 271–327). American Psychological Association.
26.
HaasN. E.Van CraenM.SkoganW. G.FleitasD. M. (2015). Explaining officer compliance: The importance of procedural justice and trust inside a police organization. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814566288
27.
KatzC. M. (2001). The establishment of a police gang unit: An examination of organizaitonal and environmental factors. Criminology, 9, 491–516.
28.
La VigneN.JannettaJ.FontaineJ.LawrenceD. S.EsthappanS. (2019). The national initiative for building community trust and justice: Key process and outcome evaluation findings. Urban Institute.
29.
LawsonS. G.WolfeS. E.RojekJ.AlpertG. P. (2022). Occupational stress and attitudes toward misconduct in law enforcement: The moderating role of organizational justice. Police Practice and Research, 23(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2021.1946395
30.
LindE. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in Organizational Justice, 56(8), 56–88.
MacCallumR. C.AustinJ. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
33.
MazerolleL.SargeantE.CherneyA.BennettS.MurphyK.AntrobusE.MartinP. (2014). Procedural justice and legitimacy in policing. Springer.
34.
McCartyW.DewaldS. (2017). Sheriff’s deputies and police officers: Comparing their views. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(1), 665–680.
35.
MPlus. (n.d.). Chi-Square difference testing using the Satorra-Bentler scaled Chi-Square.
36.
MustardD. B. (2003). Reexamining criminal behavior: The importance of omitted variable bias. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2003.85.1.205
PerrowC. (1961). The analysis of goals in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 26(6), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090570
41.
PerrowC. (2014). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). Echo Point Books & Media.
42.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the presidents task force on 21st century policing.
43.
ReynoldsP. D.FitzgeraldB. A.HicksJ. (2018). The expendables: A qualitative study of police officers’ responses to organizational injustice. Police Quarterly, 21(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611117731558
44.
RosenbaumD. P. (2017). The national police research platform: Introduction to a special issue. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(1), 665–680.
45.
RosenbaumD. P.HartnettS. M.SkoganW. G.MastrofskiS. D.CordnerG.FridellL. A.McCartyW. P.McDevittJ.AlderdenM. (2015). The national police research platform, phase 2[United States], 2013-2015: Description. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
46.
RosenbaumD. P.LawrenceD. S. (2013). Teaching respectful police-citizen encounters and good decision making: Results of a randomized control trial with police recruits. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring possitiveness of the scaled chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248.
49.
SchaeferB.HughesT. (2016). Honing Interpersonal Necessary Tactics (H.I.N.T.): An evaluation of procedural justice training. Louisville, KY: Southern Police Institute, University of Louisville.
SkoganW. G.Van CraenM.HennessyC. (2015). Training police for procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9223-6
52.
SunI. Y.WuY.LiuJ.Van CraenM. (2019). Institutional procedural justice and street procedural justice in Chinese policing: The mediating role of moral alignment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 52(2), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865818782572
53.
TankebeJ. (2014). The making of “democracy’s champions”: Understanding police support for democracy in Ghana. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812469380
54.
ThompsonI. (2016). The impact of procedural justice training on first year constables’ interactions with citizens: A randomized controlled trial [Master’s thesis]. University of Cambridge.
55.
TrinknerR.TylerD. H. (2020). Build momentum for police reform through organizational justice. In KatzC. M.MaguireE. R. (Eds.), Transforming the police: Thirteen key reforms (pp. 195 – 208). Waveland Press.
56.
TrinknerR.TylerT. R.GoffP. A. P. A. (2016). Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000085
57.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Yale University Press.
58.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.
59.
Van CraenM. (2016a). Fair policing from the inside out. In DeflemM. (Ed.), The politics of policing: Between force and legitimacy (pp. 3–19). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
60.
Van CraenM. (2016b). Understanding police officers’ trust and trustworthy behavior: A work relations framework. European Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815617187
61.
Van CraenM.ParmentierS.RauschenbachM. (2017). Good cops, bad cops: Why do police officers treat citizens (dis) respectfully? Findings from Belgium. In OberwittlerD.RochéS. (Eds.), Police-citizen relations across the world (pp. 266–283). Routledge.
62.
Van CraenM.SkoganW. G. (2017). Achieving fairness in policing: The link between internal and external procedural justice. Police Quarterly, 20(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116657818
63.
Van den BosK.LindE. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–60). Academic Press.
64.
WeisburdD.TelepC. W.VovakH.ZastrowT.BragaA. A.TurchanB. (2022). Reforming the police through procedural justice training: A multicity randomized trial at crime hot spots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 119(14), e2118780119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118780119
65.
WestmarlandL. (2010). Dodgy customers? Can the police ever trust the public?Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 291–297.
66.
WhellerL.QuintonP.FildesA.MillsA. (2013). The greater Manchester police procedural justice training experiment (p. 74). Coventry, UK: College of Policing.
67.
WolfeS. E.LawsonS. G. (2020). The organizational justice effect among criminal justice employees: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 58(4), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12251
68.
WolfeS. E.NixJ. (2016). The alleged “Ferguson effect” and police willingness to engage in community partnership. Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000164
69.
WolfeS. E.NixJ. (2017). Police officers trust in their agency: Does self-legitimacy protect against supervisor procedural injustice?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(5), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816671753
70.
WolfeS. E.PiqueroA. R. (2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810397739
71.
WolfeS. E.RojekJ.ManjarrezV. M.RojekA. (2018). Why does organizational justice matter? Uncertainty management among law enforcement officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.11.003
72.
WolfeS.RojekJ.McLeanK.AlpertG. (2020). Social interaction training to reduce police use of force. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219887366
73.
WuY.SunI. Y.ChangC. K.-M.HsuK. K.-L. (2017). Procedural justice received and given: Supervisory treatment, emotional states, and behavioral compliance among Taiwanese police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(7), 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817702407
74.
WuY.SunI. Y.Van CraenM.LiuJ. (2019). Linking supervisory procedural accountability to officer procedural accountability in Chinese policing. Policing and Society, 29(7), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1391809
75.
YangK. (2005). Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 273–285.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
