Unpacking the Group Engagement Model Within a Police Department: Peers,Legitimacy,and Unintended Consequences

Abstract

The group engagement model (GEM) suggests that a fair internal climate within police departments enhances officer support for fair policing. However, prior work has not considered the role of peers in creating a fair climate, the theoretical positioning of legitimacy perceptions, and the possible unintended effects of internal fairness. Active-duty officers (n = 292) completed a survey measuring their perceptions of peer and supervisor procedural justice, distributive justice, police identification, legitimacy of both command and supervisors and support for procedurally just policing and intrusive policing. The results showed that peer procedural justice was associated with both support for procedurally just policing and intrusive policing. The implications of the result are discussed in terms of the role of peers in a fair internal climate and the potential for a fair climate to have unanticipated effects on officers’ support for various policing strategies.

Keywords

group engagement model procedural justice legitimacy distributive justice police identification and intrusive policing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Missing data. In Millsap

R. E.

Maydeu-Olivares

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020994.n4

Atwater

L. E.

Brett

J. F.

Charles

A. C.

(2007). Multisource feedback: Lessons learned and implications for practice. Human Resource Management, 46(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20161

Bayley

D. H.

Bittner

(1984). Learning the skills of policing. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191686

Blader

S. L.

Tyler

T. R.

(2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extra role behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935

Bolger

P. C.

Walters

G. D.

(2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001

Bradford

(2014). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing & Society, 24(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2012.724068

Bradford

Quinton

(2014). Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1023–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu053

Bradford

Quinton

Myhill

Porter

(2014). Why do “the law” comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations. European Journal of Criminology, 11(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813491898

Bratton

W. J.

Kelling

G. L.

(2015). Why we need broken windows policing. City Journal, 25(1), 10–17.

10.

Chen

F. L.

Sun

Wang

S. Y. K.

(2021). Does officer self-legitimacy mediate the linkage between internal and external procedural justice? Evidence from Taiwanese police officers. Policing: An International Journal, 44(5), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2021-0047

11.

Cropanzano

Benson

III (2011). Peer justice and teamwork process. Group & Organization Management, 36(5), 567–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111414561

12.

Davis

Brooks

Scott

(2020). Sheriffs’ offices: Policies and procedures, 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/sopp16.pdf

13.

Donner

C. M.

Olson

D. E.

(2020). Fair treatment in policing: Testing the relationship between internal and external procedural justice. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1677262

14.

Fine

A. D.

Rowan

Simmons

(2019). Do politics Trump race in determining America’s youths’ perceptions of law enforcement? Journal of Criminal Justice, 61, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.003

15.

Haas

N. E.

Van Craen

Skogan

W. G.

Fleitas

D. M.

(2015). Explaining officer compliance: The importance of procedural justice and trust inside a police organization. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814566288

16.

Haskins

P. A.

(2019). Research will shape the future of proactive policing. National Institute of Justice Journal Issue, 281, 1–11.

17.

Ingram

J. R.

Paoline

E. A.

III Terrill

(2013). A multilevel framework for understanding police culture: The role of the workgroup. Criminology, 51(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12009

18.

Jackson

Bradford

Hough

Myhill

Quinton

Tyler

T. R.

(2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032

19.

Jones

J. M.

(2015, June 19). U.S., confidence in police lowest in 22 years. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/183704/confidence-police-lowest-years.aspx

20.

Jones

J. M.

(2021, July 14). U.S., Black confidence in police recovers from 2020 low. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/352304/black-confidence-police-recovers-2020-low.aspx

21.

Klinger

D. A.

(1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00877.x

22.

Kubrin

C. E.

Messner

S. F.

Deane

McGeever

Stucky

T. D.

(2010). Proactive policing and robbery rates across US cities. Criminology, 48(1), 57–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00180.x

23.

Kyprianides

Bradford

Jackson

Yesberg

Stott

Radburn

(2021). Identity, legitimacy and cooperation with police: Comparing general-population and street-population samples from London. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(4), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000312

24.

Lambert

E. G.

Hogan

N. L.

Jiang

Elechi

O. O.

Benjamin

Morris

Laux

J. M.

Dupuy

(2010). The relationship among distributive and procedural justice and correctional life satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.002

25.

Leach

C. W.

Van Zomeren

Zebel

Vliek

M. L.

Pennekamp

S. F.

Doosje

Spears

(2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144

26.

Mathieu

J. E.

Rapp

T. L.

(2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013257

27.

Murphy

Cherney

(2012). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. The British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr065

28.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). Policing to promote the rule of law and protect the population: An evidence-based approach.

29.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Developing policing practices that build legitimacy. National Academies Press.

30.

Paoline

E. A.

(2003). Taking stock: Toward a richer understanding of police culture. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(03)00002-3

31.

Paoline

E. A.

Gau

J. M.

(2018). Police occupational culture: Testing the monolithic model. Justice Quarterly, 35(4), 670–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1335764

32.

Paternoster

(2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? In Brooks

(Eds.), Deterrence (pp. 57–115). Routledge.

33.

Peacock

R. P.

Ivkovich

S. K.

Borovec

Cajner Mraovic

(2023). Contrasting the role of trustworthy versus fair supervisors in organizational justice models of policing outcomes. Policing: An International Journal, 46(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2022-0099

34.

Peacock

R. P.

Ivković

S. K.

Sun

Vinogradac

V. P.

(2023). The distinct role of peers and supervisors in shaping officers’ just and unjust interactions with citizens. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221140353

35.

Posch

Jackson

Bradford

Macqueen

(2021). “Truly free consent”? Clarifying the nature of police legitimacy using causal mediation analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17, 563–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09426-x

36.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

37.

President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Interim Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

38.

Reisig

M. D.

Flippin

Meško

Trinkner

(2021). The effects of justice judgments on police legitimacy across urban neighborhoods: A test of the invariance thesis. Crime & Delinquency, 67(9), 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720977435

39.

Reisig

M. D.

Trinkner

Sarpong

(2023). Measuring normative obligation to obey the police: An empirical assessment of a new police legitimacy scale. Journal of Criminal Justice, 86, 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102045

40.

Sarpong

(2024). National Identification and Public Cooperation with the Police in Ghana. Journal of Criminal Justice, 94, 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102235

41.

Schulhofer

S. J.

Tyler

T. R.

Huq

A. Z.

(2011). American policing at a crossroads: Unsustainable policies and the procedural justice alternative. Journal and Criminal Law and Criminology, 101(2), 335–374.

42.

Silver

J. R.

Roche

S. P.

Bilach

T. J.

Bontrager Ryon

(2017). Traditional police culture, use of force, and procedural justice: Investigating individual, organizational, and contextual factors. Justice Quarterly, 34(7), 1272–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1381756

43.

Skogan

W. G.

Van Craen

Hennessy

(2015). Training police for procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9223-6

44.

Skolnick

J. H.

(2011). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society. The University of Chicago Law Review, 34(1), 226–234.

45.

StataCorp. (2017). Stata: Release 15. Statistical software.

46.

Sun

I. Y.

(2002). Police officer attitudes toward peers, supervisors, and citizens: A comparison between field training officers and regular officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898971

47.

Sun

I. Y.

Van Craen

Hsu

K. K. L.

(2018). Internal procedural justice, moral alignment, and external procedural justice in democratic policing. Police Quarterly, 21(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611118772270

48.

Tankebe

(2019). In their own eyes: An empirical examination of police legitimacy. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2018.1487870

49.

Terrill

Paoline

E. A.

Manning

P. K.

(2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41(4), 1003–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01012.x

50.

Trinkner

Tyler

D. H.

(2020). Build momentum for police reform through organizational justice. In Katz

C. M.

Maguire

E. R.

(Eds.), Transforming the police: Thirteen key reforms (pp. 195–208). Waveland Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3469804

51.

Trinkner

Tyler

T. R.

Goff

P. A.

(2016). Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000085

52.

Tyler

D. H.

(2024). Unpacking the mechanisms connecting: Internal and external procedural fairness. Crime & Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241227927

53.

Tyler

T. R.

(1990). Justice, self-interest, and the legitimacy of legal and political authority. In Mansbridge

J. J.

(Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 171–179). University of Chicago Press.

54.

Tyler

T. R.

(1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4

55.

Tyler

T. R.

(2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411

56.

Tyler

T. R.

(2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038

57.

Tyler

T. R.

Blader

S. L.

(2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Routledge.

58.

Tyler

T. R.

Blader

S. L.

(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07

59.

Tyler

T. R.

Callahan

P. E.

Frost

(2007). Armed, and dangerous (?): Motivating rule adherence among agents of social control. Law & Society Review, 41(2), 457–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00304.x

60.

Tyler

T. R.

Goff

P. A.

MacCoun

R. J.

(2015). The impact of psychological science on policing in the United States: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791

61.

Tyler

T. R.

Lind

E. A.

(1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X

62.

Van Craen

Skogan

W. G.

(2017). Achieving fairness in policing: The link between internal and external procedural justice. Police Quarterly, 20(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116657818

63.

Walters

G. D.

Bolger

P. C.

(2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2

64.

Westley

W. A.

(1970). Violence and the police (pp. 126–127). The MIT Press.

65.

Williams

C. L.

Sun

I. Y.

Van Craen

(2022). Exploring the direct and indirect linkages between supervisory disrespect and officer cooperation and disrespect in policing. Police Quarterly, 25(3), 338–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211037878

66.

Yunker

R. M.

(1977). Police field training: The analysis of a socialization process. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 38(4-A), 2017.