According to the focal concerns perspective, the concerns guiding judges’ sentencing considerations are blameworthiness and harm, community protection, and practical considerations. Regarding racial and other disparities in sentencing, focal concerns contend that various constraints, associations between defendants’ demographic characteristics, and the three focal concerns influence judicial decision-making. One association that is explored infrequently is the institutionalization decision of juveniles and how that decision is associated with race and various school-based metrics. Using a sample of adjudicated delinquent juveniles from one state over a 5-year period and merged with American Community Survey data, the present study explores how school factors alongside race serve as focal concerns for judges, impacting the decision to institutionalize juveniles.
AizerA.DoyleJ. J. (2015). Juvenile incarceration, human capital, and future crime: Evidence from randomly assigned judges. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 759–803.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2001). Missing Data. Sage Publications.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2012). Logistic regression using SAS: Theory and application. SAS institute.
4.
AngtonA. (2020). Black girls and the discipline gap: Exploring the early stages of the school- to-prison pipeline (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University).
5.
AnnammaS. A. (2014). Disabling juvenile justice: Engaging the stories of incarcerated young women of color with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 313–324.
6.
ArmstrongG. S.RodriguezN. (2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on preadjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 521–539.
7.
ArnezJ.CondryR. (2021). Criminological perspectives on school exclusion and youth offending. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 26(1), 87–100.
8.
BäckmanO. (2017). High school dropout, resource attainment, and criminal convictions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(5), 715–749.
9.
BartonW. H.ButtsJ. A. (2008). Building on strength: Positive youth development in juvenile justice programs. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
10.
BellC. (2016). Special needs under siege: From classrooms to incarceration. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 698–705.
11.
BishopD. M.FeldB. C. (2014). Juvenile justice in the get tough era. Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2, 2765–2773.
12.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E.Lanza-KaduceL.WinnerL. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference?Crime and Delinquency, 42(2), 171–191.
13.
BonnerT.DeLisiM.Jones-JohnsonG.CaudillJ. W.TrulsonC. (2020). Chaotic homes, adverse childhood experiences, and serious delinquency: Differential effects by race and ethnicity. Justice Quarterly, 37(4), 697–714.
14.
BradyP. Q.ReynsB. W. (2020). A focal concerns perspective on prosecutorial decision making in cases of intimate partner stalking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 733–748.
15.
BrittC. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17(4), 707–732.
16.
Bueno-HansenP.MontesA. (2019). White passing? No! Seeing myself in my own light. Latino Studies, 17, 522–531.
17.
BuglarS. (2016). The ‘focal concerns’ of parole board decision-making: A thematic analysis. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(3), 285–302.
18.
BurrowJ. D.LoweryP. G. (2015). A preliminary assessment of the impact of plea bargaining among a sample of waiver-eligible offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(3), 211–227.
19.
BushwayS. D.PiehlA. M. (2007). The inextricable link between age and criminal history in sentencing. Crime and Delinquency, 53(1), 156–183.
20.
CassidyL.ReggioK.ShaywitzB. A.HolahanJ. M.ShaywitzS. E. (2021). Dyslexia in incarcerated men and women: A new perspective on reading disability in the prison population. Journal of Correctional Education, 72(2), 61–81.
21.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P. (2015). Race, ethnic, and gender divides in juvenile court sanctioning and rehabilitative intervention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 181–212.
22.
CohenD. R.LewisC.EddyC. L.HenryL.HodgsonC. L.HuangF.ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C. (2023). In-school and out-of-school suspension: Behavioral and psychological outcomes in a predominately black sample of middle school students. School Psychology Review, 52, 1–14.
23.
ConnellC. M.KimH. W.ShipeS. L.PittengerS. L.TebesJ. K. (2022). Effects of community-based wraparound services on child and caregiver outcomes following child protective service involvement. Child Maltreatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595221125454.
24.
CummingT. M.StrnadováI.LeeH. M.LonerganR. (2022). Education-centred formal wraparound services in support of school-aged students with complex support needs: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 46(1), 47–60.
25.
CurtisA. J. (2013). Tracing the school-to-prison pipeline from zero-tolerance policies to juvenile justice dispositions. Geological Journal, 102, 1251.
26.
DonnellyE. A. (2019). Do disproportionate minority contact (DMC) mandate reforms change decision-making? Decomposing disparities in the juvenile justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(3), 288–308.
27.
DuranteK. A. (2021). County-level context and sentence lengths for Black, Latinx, and White individuals sentenced to prison: A multi-level assessment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(9), 915–937.
28.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.PachanM. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294–309.
29.
EricsonR. D.EckbergD. A. (2016). Racial disparity in juvenile diversion: The impact of focal concerns and organizational coupling. Race and Justice, 6(1), 35–56.
30.
FeldB. C. (1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 82, 156.
31.
ForsythC. J.AsmusG.HowatH.PeiL. K.ForsythY. A.StokesB. R. (2014). Examining the relationship between school suspensions/expulsions and felonies. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime Law and Society, 27(2), 149–158.
32.
FreiburgerT. L.JordanK. L. (2011). A multilevel analysis of race on the decision to petition a case in the juvenile court. Race and Justice, 1(2), 185–201.
33.
GoldmanM.RodriguezN. (2022). The state as the “Ultimate Parent”: The implications of family for racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. Race and Justice, 12(4), 714–735.
34.
GuevaraL.BoydL. M.TaylorA. P.BrownR. A. (2011). Racial disparities in juvenile court outcomes: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 9(3), 200–217.
35.
HarrisA. (2008). The social construction of “sophisticated” adolescents: How judges integrate juvenile and criminal justice decision-making models. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(4), 469–506.
36.
HarrisA. (2009). Attributions and institutional processing: How focal concerns guide decision-making in the juvenile court. Race and Social Problems, 1(4), 243–256.
37.
HartleyR. D.MaddanS.SpohnC. C. (2007). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective–A research note. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4(1), 58–78.
38.
HemezP.BrentJ. J.MowenT. J. (2019). Exploring the school-to-prison pipeline: How school suspensions influence incarceration during young adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(3), 235–255.
39.
HenryK. K.CatagnusR. M.GriffithA. K.GarciaY. A. (2022). Ending the school-to-Prison Pipeline: Perception and experience with zero-tolerance policies and interventions to address racial inequality. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1254–1263.
40.
HickertA.BushwayS. D.HardingD. J.MorenoffJ. D. (2022). Prior punishments and cumulative disadvantage: How supervision status impacts prison sentences. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 60(1), 27–59.
41.
HirschfieldP. J. (2018). The role of schools in sustaining juvenile justice system inequality. The Future of Children/Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 28(1), 11–35.
42.
HoebenE. M.WeermanF. M. (2016). Why is involvement in unstructured socializing related to adolescent delinquency?Criminology, 54(2), 242–281.
43.
HoffmannJ. P. (2021). Linear regression models: Applications in R. Crc Press.
44.
JabbariJ.JohnsonO. (2023). The collateral damage of in-school suspensions: A counterfactual analysis of high-suspension schools, math achievement and college attendance. Urban Education, 58, 801–837.
45.
JacksonJ. R.BennionK. A. (2021). Perceptions of school shooters depend on prior criminal record but not targeted age group. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17-18), 8186–8208.
46.
JordanK. L.MarounR. (2022). Examining the impact of racial/ethnic threat on juvenile court outcomes: A multi-level approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 450–466.
47.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local Court "corrections" to Pennsylvania's sentencing guidelines. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 40(4), 897–932.
48.
LeiberM. J. (2013). Race, pre- and postdetention, and juvenile justice decision making. Crime and Delinquency, 59(3), 396–418.
49.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H. (2015). Race, gender, crime severity, and decision making in the juvenile justice system. Crime and Delinquency, 61(6), 771–797.
50.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H.Beaudry-CyrM. (2016). The likelihood of a “youth discount” in juvenile court sanctions: The influence of offender race, gender, and age. Race and Justice, 6(1), 5–34.
51.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H.LugoM.BishopD. M. (2017). Understanding the link between race/ethnicity, drug offending, and juvenile court outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 63(14), 1807–1837.
52.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H.RodriguezN. (2016). Minority threat and juvenile court outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 62(1), 54–80.
53.
LongJ. S.MustilloS. A. (2021). Using predictions and marginal effects to compare groups in regression models for binary outcomes. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(3), 1284–1320.
54.
LoweryP. G. (2021). Characterizing the effects of symbolic and racial threat on charge modifications in the juvenile court. Race and Justice, 11(4), 475–499.
55.
LoweryP. G.BurrowJ. D.KaminskiR. J. (2018). A multilevel test of the racial threat hypothesis in one state’s juvenile court. Crime and Delinquency, 64(1), 53–87.
56.
MartinezR.Jr. (2014). Latino homicide: Immigration, violence, and community. Routledge.
57.
McAraL.McVieS. (2010). Youth crime and justice: Key messages from the Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(2), 179–209.
58.
MittlemanJ. (2018). A downward spiral? Childhood suspension and the path to juvenile arrest. Sociology of Education, 91(3), 183–204.
59.
MizeT. D.DoanL.LongJ. S. (2019). A general framework for comparing predictions and marginal effects across models. Sociological Methodology, 49(1), 152–189.
60.
MonahanK. C.VanDerheiS.BechtoldJ.CauffmanE. (2014). From the school yard to the squad car: School discipline, truancy, and arrest. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1110–1122.
61.
MooreL. D.PadavicI. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparities in girls’ sentencing in the Juvenile Justice System. Feminist Criminology, 5(3), 263–285.
62.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86.
63.
MorrowW. J.DarioL. M.RodriguezN. (2015). Examining the prevalence of a ‘youth discount’ in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 473–490.
64.
MowenT.BrentJ. (2016). School discipline as a turning point: The cumulative effect of suspension on arrest. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(5), 628–653.
65.
MustilloS.KwonS. (2015). Auxiliary variables in multiple imputation when data are missing not at random. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 39(2), 73–91.
66.
MustilloS. A.LizardoO. A.McVeighR. M. (2018). Editors’ comment: A few guidelines for quantitative submissions. American Sociological Review, 83(6), 1281–1283.
67.
MusuL.ZhangA.WangK.ZhangJ.OudekerkB. A. (2019). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2018. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S, Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019047.pdf.
68.
MyersT. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 297–310.
69.
Nicholson-CrottyS.BirchmeierZ.ValentineD. (2009). Exploring the impact of school discipline on racial disproportion in the juvenile justice system. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4), 1003–1018.
70.
NolanK. (2011). Police in the hallways: Discipline in an urban high school. University of Minnesota Press.
71.
NovakA. (2019). The school-to-prison pipeline: An examination of the association between suspension and justice system involvement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(8), 1165–1180.
72.
NovakA.De Francisco LopesV. (2022). Child delinquency, ACEs, and the juvenile justice system: Does exposure to ACEs affect justice system experiences for children?Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 20(2), 113–138.
73.
OwensJ.McLanahanS. S. (2019). Unpacking the drivers of racial disparities in school suspension and expulsion. Social Forces; A Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation, 98(4), 1548–1577.
74.
PeckJ. H.Beaudry-CyrM. (2016). Does who appears before the juvenile court matter on adjudication and disposition outcomes? The interaction between client race and lawyer type. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 131–152.
75.
PupoJ. A.ZaneS. N. (2021). Assessing variations in juvenile court processing in urban versus rural courts: Revisiting “justice by geography. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(3), 330–354.
76.
QuillianL.PagerD. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 717–767.
77.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). sage.
78.
RodriguezN. (2013). Concentrated disadvantage and the incarceration of youth: Examining how context affects juvenile justice. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 189–215.
79.
RosenbaumJ. (2020). Educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension. Youth Sociology, 52(4), 515–547.
80.
SharkeyP.Torrats-EspinosaG.TakyarD. (2017). Community and the crime decline: The causal effect of local nonprofits on violent crime. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1214–1240.
81.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36(4), 763–798.
82.
SteinerB. (2005). Predicting sentencing outcomes and time served for juveniles transferred to criminal court in a rural northwestern state. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(6), 601–610.
83.
StenersenM. R.KellyA.BraceyJ.MarshallT.CumminsM.ClarkK.KaufmanJ. S. (2022). Understanding racial-ethnic disparities in wraparound care for youths with emotional and behavioral disorders. Psychiatric Services, 73(5), 526–532.
84.
SterneJ. A.WhiteI. R.CarlinJ. B.SprattM.RoystonP.KenwardM. G.WoodA. M.CarpenterJ. R. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, b2393.
85.
ThornberryT. P. (1979). Sentencing disparities in the Juvenile Justice System. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 70(2), 164–171.
86.
UlmerJ. T.KurlychekM. C.KramerJ. H. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 427–458.
87.
WalkerD. A.CesarG. T. (2020). Examining the “gang penalty” in the juvenile justice system: A focal concerns perspective. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 18(4), 315–336.
88.
WelchS.SpohnC. (1986). Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges' sentencing decisions: A seven-city comparison. Justice Quarterly, 3(4), 389–407.
89.
WilsonW. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. University of Chicago Press.
90.
WintersC. A. (1997). Learning disabilities, crime, delinquency, and special education placement. Adolescence, 32(126), 451–462.
91.
WolfK. C.KupchikA. (2017). School suspensions and adverse experiences in adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 34(3), 407–430.
92.
YangJ. L.AnyonY.PaulineM.WileyK. E.CashD.DowningB. J.GreerE.KeltyE.MorganT. L.PisciottaL. (2018). We have to educate every single student, not just the ones that look like us”: Support service providers’ beliefs about the root causes of the school-to-prison pipeline for youth of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(3-4), 316–331.
93.
ZaneS. N. (2021). Have racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile justice declined over time? An empirical assessment of the DMC mandate. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(2), 163–185.
94.
ZaneS. N.MearsD. P.WelshB. C. (2020). How universal is disproportionate minority contact? An examination of racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile justice processing across four states. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 817–841.
95.
ZaneS. N.PupoJ. A. (2023). The political and religious context of juvenile punishment: A multilevel examination of juvenile court dispositions in three southern states. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278231165888.
