Examining “Mass Probation” Through an Intersectional Lens: The Intracategorical Effects of Race and Ethnicity on Women and Men’s Probation Outcomes in Kansas

Abstract

Community supervision increased dramatically since the early 2000s. Similar to trends in prison admissions, the increase has not been equal across racial and ethnic groups. In addition to disparities in placement onto supervision, experiences under supervision and outcomes may also be shaped by intersecting identities. Accordingly, this study examined probation outcomes among 4,433 probation cases in 2018 in Kansas. We assess how race and ethnicity impact outcomes among women and men while controlling for criminogenic risk and need, offense, financial stability, and other factors using multilevel modeling. Results indicate that race and ethnicity were unrelated to probation outcomes for women; however, Black men were subject to the worst odds of probation outcomes. Policy and future research implications are discussed.

Keywords

gender race ethnicity probation corrections

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2000). The Level of Service Inventory – Revised. Multi-Health Systems.

Bannon

Nagrecha

Diller

(2010). Criminal justice debt: A barrier to reentry. Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/criminal-justice-debt-barrier-reentry

Bauer

G. R.

Scheim

A. I.

(2019). Advancing quantitative intersectionality research methods: Intracategorical and intercategorical approaches to shared and differential constructs. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 260–262.

Bearden v. Georgia: 461 U.S. 660 (1983).

Bechtold

Monahan

Wakefield

Cauffman

(2015). The role of race in probation monitoring and responses to probation violations among juvenile offenders in two jurisdictions. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 21, 323–337.

Belshaw

S. H.

(2011). Are all probation revocations treated equal? An examination of felony probation revocations in a large Texas county. International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing, 27(2), 67–76.

Bloom

Owen

Covington

(2003). Gender-responsive Strategies. National Institute of Corrections.

Boppre

(2019). Improving correctional strategies for women at the margins: Recommendations for an intersectionally-responsive approach. Corrections, 4(3), 195–221.

10.

Boppre

Boyer

(2022). “They aim for me” versus “under the radar”: Understanding women’s experiences in the Oregon criminal legal system through an intersectional lens. Victims & Offenders, 17, 1029–1054.

11.

Boppre

Harmon

M. G.

(2017). The unintended consequences of sentencing reforms: Using social chain theory to examine racial disparities in female imprisonment. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 15(4), 394–423.

12.

Boppre

Salisbury

E. J.

Parker

(2018). Pathways to crime. In Pontell

Holtfreter

(Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press.

13.

Bowleg

(2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325.

14.

Bradner

Schiraldi

V. N.

Mejia

Lopoo

(2020). More work to do: Analysis of probation and parole in the United States, 2017–2018. Justice Lab, Columbia University. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/d8-hjyq-fg65

15.

Browne

G. E.

Melander

Boppre

Edwards

M. E.

(2022). The gendered effects of a graduated sanctions model on probation outcomes in Kansas. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 33(4), 373–398.

16.

Burgess-Proctor

(2006). Intersections of race, class, gender, and crime: Future directions for feminist criminology. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 27–47.

17.

Campbell

C. M.

(2016). It’s not technically a crime: Investigating the relationship between technical violations and new crime. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(7), 643–667.

18.

Chesney-Lind

Morash

(2013). Transformative feminist criminology: A critical re-thinking of a discipline. Critical Criminology, 21(3), 287–304.

19.

Chesney-Lind

Pasko

(2013). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. SAGE Publications.

20.

Clear

T. R.

Frost

N. A.

(2013). The punishment imperative. New York University Press.

21.

Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2019). Confined and costly: How supervision violations are filling prisons and burdening budgets. https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/confined-and-costly.pdf

22.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

23.

Crenshaw

(2012). From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1418–1472.

24.

Doherty

(2016). Obey all laws and be good: Probation and the meaning of recidivism. The Georgetown Law Journal, 104, 291.

25.

Eckhouse

Lum

Conti-Cook

Ciccolini

(2019). Layers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 185–209.

26.

Enders

Pecorino

Souto

A. C.

(2019). Racial disparity in US imprisonment across states and over time. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35, 365–392.

27.

Feld

B. C.

(1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 156.

28.

Fines and Fees Justice Center. (2020, June 9). Paying on probation: How financial sanctions intersect with probation to target, trap, and punish people who cannot pay. https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/articles/financial-sanctions-intersect-with-probation/

29.

Freiburger

T. L.

Hilinski

C. M.

(2013). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime & Delinquency, 59(1), 59–86.

30.

Fulton

Stichman

Travis

Latessa

(1997). Moderating probation and parole officer attitudes to achieve desired outcomes. The Prison Journal, 77, 295–312.

31.

Garland

(2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.

32.

Gould

L. A.

Pate

Sarver

(2011). Risk and revocation in community corrections: The role of gender. Probation Journal, 58, 250–264.

33.

Hannah

(2019, February 12). Kansas declares staffing emergency at most crowded prison. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/68d606d1cb584acfbca096368874a6e3

34.

Harcourt

B. E.

(2015). Risk as a proxy for race: The dangers of risk assessment. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 27, 237–243.

35.

Harris

(2016). A pound of flesh: Monetary sanctions as punishment for the poor. Russell SAGE Foundation.

36.

Hitchens

B. K.

Carr

P. J.

Clampet-Lundquist

(2018). The context for legal cynicism: Urban young women’s experiences with policing in low-income, high-crime neighborhoods. Race and Justice, 8, 27–50.

37.

Horowitz

Utada

(2018, December 6). Community supervision marked by racial and gender disparities. The Pew Charitable Trusts. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/12/06/community-supervision-marked-by-racial-and-gender-disparities

38.

Johnson

B. D.

(2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259–298.

39.

Jones

Kerbs

J. J.

(2007). Probation and parole officers and discretionary decision-making: Responses to technical and criminal violations. Federal Probation, 71, 9.

40.

Kaeble

Alper

(2020). Probation and parole in the United States, 2017–2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

41.

Kaeble

Cowhig

(2018). Correctional populations in the United States, 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

42.

Kaeble

Maruschak

L. M.

Bonczar

T. P.

(2015). Probation and parole in the United States, 2014. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

43.

Leiber

M. J.

Peck

J. H.

(2013). Probation violations and juvenile justice decision making: Implications for Blacks and Hispanics. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11, 60–78.

44.

Louden

J. E.

Skeem

J. L.

Camp

Christensen

(2008). Supervising probationers with mental disorder: How do agencies respond to violations? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 832–847.

45.

Martin

K. D.

Sykes

B. L.

Shannon

Edwards

Harris

(2018). Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in U.S. systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 471–495.

46.

Mayzer

Gray

M. K.

Maxwell

S. R.

(2004). Probation absconders: A unique risk group? Criminal Justice Journal, 32, 137–150.

47.

McCall

(2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30, 1771–1800.

48.

Middlemass

K. M.

Smiley

(2016). Doing a bid: The construction of time as punishment. The Prison Journal, 96, 793–813.

49.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2015). The effects of probation or parole agent relationship style and women offenders’ criminogenic needs on offenders’ responses to supervision interactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 412–434.

50.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2019). Technical violations, treatment and punishment responses, and recidivism of women on probation and parole. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30, 788–810.

51.

Morgan

K. D.

(1993). Factors influence probation outcome: A review of the literature. Federal Probation, 57, 23–29.

52.

National Women’s Law Center. (2022, January 5). Black women and Latina headed households face high poverty rates. https://nwlc.org/black-women-and-latina-headed-households-face-high-poverty-rates/

53.

NeMoyer

Goldstein

N. E.

McKitten

R. L.

Prelic

Ebbecke

Foster

Burkard

(2014). Predictors of juveniles’ noncompliance with probation requirements. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 580–591.

54.

Opsal

Alexander

(2019). Gender and community corrections experience. In F. P. Bernat, K. Frailing, L. Gelsthorpe & S. Kethineni (Eds.), The encyclopedia of women and crime (pp. 1–3). Wiley-Blackwell.

55.

Pager

(2008). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. The University of Chicago Press.

56.

Phelps

(2018). Mass probation and inequality: Race, class, and gender disparities in supervision and revocation. In Ulmer

J. T.

Bradley

(Eds.), Handbook on Punishment Decisions: Locations of disparity. ASC Division on Corrections and Sentencing Handbook Series (Vol. 2, pp. 43–66). Routledge.

57.

Phelps

M. S.

(2017). Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society, 19, 53–73.

58.

Phelps

M. S.

(2020). Mass probation from micro to macro: Tracing the expansion and consequences of community supervision. Annual Review of Criminology, 3, 261–279.

59.

Potter

(2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. Routledge.

60.

Prison Policy Initiative. (2019). Women’s mass incarceration: The whole pie 2019. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2019women.html

61.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata ( Vol. II, 3rd ed.). Stata Press.

62.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

Pickles

(2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Econometrics Journal, 128, 301–323.

63.

Renzetti

(2013). Feminist criminology. Routledge.

64.

Roddy

A. L.

Morash

Northcutt Bohmert

(2021). Spatial mismatch, race and ethnicity, and unemployment: Implications for interventions with women on probation and parole. Crime & Delinquency.

65.

Ruhland

Holmes

Petkus

(2020). The role of fines and fees on probation outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 1244–1263.

66.

Salisbury

E. J.

Van Voorhis

(2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566.

67.

Schenwar

Law

(2020). Prison by any other name: The harmful consequences of popular reforms. The New Press.

68.

Schoeneberger

J. A.

(2016). The impact of sample size and other factors when estimating multilevel logistic models. Journal of Experiential Education, 84, 373–397.

69.

Schulenberg

J. L.

(2007). Predicting noncompliant behavior: Disparities in the social locations of male and female probationers. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 25–57.

70.

Smiley

(2019). Release in the era of BLM: The nexus of black lives matter and prisoner reentry. The Prison Journal, 99, 396–419.

71.

Smiley

Fakunle

(2016). From “brute” to “thug”: The demonization and criminalization of unarmed black male victims in America. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 26, 350–366.

72.

Steen

Opsal

Lovegrove

McKinzey

(2013). Putting parolees back in prison: Discretion and the parole revocation process. Criminal Justice Review, 38(1), 70–93.

73.

Steinmetz

K. F.

Anderson

J. O.

(2016). A probation profanation: Race, ethnicity, and probation in a Midwestern sample. Race and Justice, 6(4), 325–349.

74.

Steinmetz

K. F.

Henderson

(2015). On the precipice of intersectionality: The influence of race, gender, and offense severity interactions on probation outcomes. Criminal Justice Review, 40, 361–377.

75.

Steinmetz

K. F.

Henderson

(2016). Inequality on probation: An examination of differential probation outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14(1), 1–20.

76.

Steinmetz

K. F.

Koeppel

M. D.

(2017). Under the skin of probation: A statewide analysis. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 15(3), 227–250.

77.

Stevens-Martin

Oyewole

Hipolito

(2014). Technical revocations of probation in one jurisdiction: Uncovering the hidden realities. Federal Probation, 78, 16.

78.

Ulmer

J. T.

Johnson

(2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137–178.

79.

US Census Bureau. (2010). Selected economic characteristics 2006–2010 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. https://archive.ph/20200212213253/http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_10_5YR_DP03&prodType=table

80.

US Census Bureau. (2019). Quick facts sheet. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US

81.

US Census Bureau. (2020). Population of metropolitan areas in Kansas, 2010–2020 American Community Survey. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/tables.2019.html

82.

USDA. (2020). Racial and ethnic minorities made up about 22 percent of the rural population in 2018, compared to 43 percent in urban areas. Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=99538#:~:text=Blacks%20made%20up%207.8%20percent,than%20urban%20(0.4%20percent)

83.

Walmsley

(2014). World prison population list. International Centre for Prison Studies, http://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/world_prison_population_list_11th_edition_0.pdf

84.

Warner

L. R.

(2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463.

85.

Wesely

J. K.

Miller

J. M.

(2018). Justice system bias perceptions of the dually marginalized: Observations from a sample of women ex-offenders. Victims & Offenders, 13, 451–470.

86.

Williams

J. M.

Wilson

S. K.

Bergeson

(2019). “It’s hard out here if you’re a Black felon”: A critical examination of Black male reentry. The Prison Journal, 99(4), 437–458.

87.

Wing

A. K.

(Ed.). (1997). Critical race feminism: A reader. New York University Press.

88.

Zettler

H. R.

Martin

K. D.

(2020). Exploring the impact of technical violations on probation revocations in the context of drug court. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 1003–1023.