A randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the experiences of women probationers engaged in gender-responsive supervision with community health supports versus ‘gender-responsive supervision as usual.’ Treatment group participants engaged in a new supervision model in a large metropolitan county in a Western state which was created to improve their specific responsivity needs and public health supports. The Women’s Reentry Assessment, Programming, and Services (WRAPS) model included enhanced wraparound, gender-responsive, and trauma-informed supervision that incorporated Community Health Specialists (CHSs) working alongside probation officers. Although the WRAPS intervention did not reduce recidivism relative to the control group, there is evidence that gender-responsive probation supervision does reduce recidivism overall when compared to baseline. Findings from interview data indicate strong support for gender-responsive probation in general and the WRAPS model in particular. Clients and staff viewed the CHS role as highly impactful in addressing women’s specific responsivity needs and supporting women’s success. Recommendations surrounding gender-responsive probation and integration of public health staff are discussed.
AndrewsD. A.KiesslingJ. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVIC research. In RossR. R.GendreauP. (Eds), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441–463). Butterworths.
3.
ArnoldR. A. (1990). Processes of victimization and criminalization of Black women. Social Justice, 17(3), 153–166.
4.
BakkenN. W.VisherC. A. (2018). Successful reintegration and mental health: An examination of gender differences among reentering offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818774384
5.
BelisleL.SalisburyE. J. (2022). Community corrections officers as change agents. In Van VoorhisS. P. (Ed), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (10th ed., pp. 41–55). Routledge.
6.
BelisleL.SalisburyE. J.Cowell MercierM. (2023). Gender-responsive probation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Learning from justice-involved women and their supervising officers. Victims and Offenders, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2212254
7.
BelknapJ. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
BergM. T.CobbinaJ. E. (2017). Cognitive transformation, social ecological settings, and the reentry outcomes of women offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1522–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716660521
10.
BlaskoB. L.SouzaK. A.ViaB.TaxmanF. S. (2016). Performance measures in community corrections: Measuring effective supervision practices with existing agency data. Federal Probation, 80(3), 26–32.
11.
BlaskoB. L.ViglioneJ.TaylorL. R.TaxmanF. S. (2022). Sorting through the evidence: A step toward prioritization of evidence-based community supervision practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211036474
12.
BloomB. (1996). Triple jeopardy: Race, class, and gender as factors in women’s imprisonment. University of California–Riverside.
13.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
14.
BohmertM. N.DeMarisA. (2018). Cumulative disadvantage and the role of transportation in community supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 64(8), 1033–1056. https://doi-org/10.1177/0011128716686344
15.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
16.
BontaJ.BourgonG.RuggeT.ScottT.-L.YessineA. K.GutierrezL.LiJ. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1127–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811420678
17.
BoppreB. (2019). Improving correctional strategies for women at the Margins: Recommendations for an Intersectionally-responsive approach recommendations for an intersectionally-responsive approach. Corrections, 4(3), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2019.1588807
18.
BourgonG. (2013). The demands on probation officers in the evolution of evidence-based practice: The forgotten foot soldier of community corrections. Federal Probation, 77(2), 30–35.
19.
BrennanT.BreitenbachM.DieterichW.SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2012). Women’s pathways to serious and habitual crime. A person-centered analysis incorporating gender responsive factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(11), 1481–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812456777
20.
BrennanT.JacksonE. (2022). Women’s pathways: Replication and generalizability across state prison systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(9), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221096667
21.
Chesney-LindM.PaskoL. (2013). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Sage Publications, Inc.
CovingtonS. S. (2003). Beyond trauma: A healing journey for women. Facilitator’s guide. Hazelden Press.
26.
CovingtonS. S.RussoE. M. (2016). Healing trauma: A brief intervention for women. Facilitator’s guide. Hazelden Press.
27.
DalyK. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2, 11–52.
28.
DeHartD.LynchS. (2021). Women’s and girls’ pathways through the criminal legal system: Addressing trauma, mental health, and marginalization. In RenzettiC. (Ed), Cognella series on family and gender-based violence. Cognella Academic Publishing.
29.
DeHartD.LynchS.BelknapJ.Dass-BrailsfordP.GreenB. (2014). Life history models of female offending: The roles of serious mental illness and trauma in women’s pathways to jail. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313494357
30.
DowdenC.AndrewsD. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03257765
31.
FazelS.YoonI. A.HayesA. J. (2017). Substance use disorders in prisoners: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis in recently incarcerated men and women. Addiction, 112(10), 1725–1739. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13877
FryC. E.McGuireT. G.FrankR. G. (2020). Medicaid expansion’s spillover to the criminal justice system: Evidence from six urban counties. The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences: RSF, 6(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2020.6.2.11
34.
GallardoM. E.CurryS. J. (2009). Shifting perspectives: Culturally responsive interventions with Latino substance abusers. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 8(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640903110492
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard Press.
37.
GivensA.CuddebackG. S. (2021). Traumatic experiences among individuals with severe mental illnesses on probation. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health: CBMH, 31(5), 310–320. https://10.1002/cbm.2212
38.
GobeilR.BlanchetteK.StewartL. (2016). A meta-analytic review of correctional interventions for women offenders: Gender-neutral versus gender-informed approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815621100
39.
GutierrezL.ChadwickN.WanamakerK. A. (2018). Culturally relevant programming versus the status quo: A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of treatment of Indigenous offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60(3), 321–353. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2017-0020.r2
40.
HardingD. J.WesternB.SandelsonJ. A. (2022). From supervision to opportunity: Reimagining probation and parole. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 701(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221115486
41.
HawksL. C.HortonN.WangE. A. (2022). The health and health needs of people under community supervision. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 701(1), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221119661
42.
HeQ.BarkowskiS. (2020). The effect of health insurance on crime: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. Health Economics, 29(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3977
IngelS. N.DavisL. R.RudesD. S.HartwellT. N.DrazdowskiT. K.McCartM. R.ChapmanJ. E.TaxmanF. S.SheidowA. J. (2022). Misunderstanding and sensemaking among juvenile probation officers working with evidence-based practices. Victims and Offenders, 17(7), 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1985670
KennedyS. C.MennickeA.PaulR. (2021). Childhood polyvictimization and mental health issues among incarcerated women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 30(3), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2020.1774693
47.
KiʻahaL. (2016). Thinking outside the bars: Using Hawaiian traditions and culturally-based healing to eliminate racial disparities within Hawaiʻi’s criminal justice system. Asian-Pacifica Law & Policy Journal, 17(2), 2–33. http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/2016/10/APLPJ_17.2_Kiaha_Final_LK.pdf
48.
LabrecqueR. M.ViglioneJ.CaudyM. (2022). The impact of community supervision officer training programs on officer and client outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 40(4), 587–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2120062
49.
LevensonJ. S.WillisG. M. (2019). Implementing trauma-informed care in correctional treatment and supervision. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1531959
LovinsB. K.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J.JonsonC. L. (2018). Probation officer as a coach: Building a new professional identity. Federal Probation, 82, 13–19.
52.
MackeyB. J.AppletonC. J.LeeJ. S.SkidmoreS.TaxmanF. S. (2022). At the intersection of research and practice: Constructing guidelines for a hybrid model of community supervision. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 63, 101689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101689
53.
MaruschakL. M.BronsonJ. (2021). Alcohol and drug use and treatment reported by prisoners. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
54.
McIntoshM. J.MorseJ. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674
55.
MessinaN. P.EsparzaP. (2022). Poking the bear: The inapplicability of the RNR principles for justice-involved women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 140, 108798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108798
56.
MichaelS. (2005). The promise of appreciative inquiry as an interview tool for field research. Development in Practice, 15(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500042094
57.
MillerJ. B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? (Working Paper Series, Work in Progress No. 33). Stone Center.
58.
MorashM. (2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services. Northeastern University Press.
59.
MorashM.HoskinsK. M. (2022). Effective Community interventions for justice‐involved girls and women in the United States. In MerryM.HiskinsK. M. (Eds), The wiley handbook on what works with girls and women in conflict with the law: A critical review of theory, practice, and policy (pp. 256–266). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PhelpsM. S. (2020). Mass Probation from micro to macro: Tracing the expansion and consequences of community supervision. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352
64.
QuinnC.GrumbachG. (2015). Critical race theory and the limits of relational theory in social work with women. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 24(3), 202–218.
65.
RamezaniN.BrenoA. J.MackeyB. J.ViglioneJ.CuellarA. E.JohnsonJ. E.TaxmanF. S. (2022). The relationship between community public health, behavioral health service accessibility, and mass incarceration. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 966. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08306-6
RichieB. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. Routledge.
68.
RoddyA. L.MorashM.Northcutt BohmertM. (2022). Spatial mismatch, race and ethnicity, and unemployment: Implications for interventions with women on probation and parole. Crime & Delinquency, 68(12), 2175–2199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211046520
69.
RudesD. S.PortilloS.TaxmanF. S. (2021). The legitimacy of change: Adopting/adapting, implementing and sustaining reforms within community corrections agencies. British Journal of Criminology, 61(6), 1665–1683. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab020
70.
SalisburyE. J.BoppreB.KellyB. (2016). Gender-responsive risk and need assessment: Implications for justice-involved women. In TaxmanF. S. (Ed.), Handbook on Risk and need assessment: Theory and practice (pp. 220–243). Routledge.
71.
SalisburyE. J.SundtJ.BoppreB. (2019). Mapping the implementation landscape: Assessing the systemic capacity of statewide community corrections agencies to deliver evidence-based practices. Corrections, 4(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1522279
72.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationer’s paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076
73.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP.SpiropoulosG. V. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 55(4), 550–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707308102
74.
SengM.LurigioA. J. (2005). Probation officers’ views on supervising women probationers. Women & Criminal Justice, 16(1-2), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v16n01_03
75.
SilvermanD. (2009). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
76.
SimesJ. T.JahnJ. L. (2022). The consequences of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act for police arrests. PLoS One, 17(1), e0261512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261512
77.
SkeemJ.MonahanJ.LowenkampC. (2016). Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: The cost of treating women like men. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000206
78.
SkeemJ. L.LoudenJ. E.PolaschekD.CampJ. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
79.
SkeemJ. L.ManchakS. (2008). Back to the future: From Klockars' model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134069
80.
StoneR.MorashM.GoodsonM.SmithS.CobbinaJ. (2018). Women on parole, identity processes, and primary desistance. Feminist Criminology, 13(4), 382–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116670004
81.
TadrosE.OwensD. (2020). Clinical implications for culturally informed counseling with incarcerated individuals. American Journal of Family Therapy, 49(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1813659
82.
TripodiS.Pettus-DavisC.BenderK.FitzgeraldM.RennT.KennedyS. (2019). Pathways to recidivism for women released from prison: A mediated model of abuse, mental health issues, and substance use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(9), 1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819867119
Van VoorhisP.WrightE.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender-responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357442
88.
Van WormerK. (2001). Counseling female offenders and victims: A strengths-based approach. Springer.
89.
ViglioneJ.RudesD. S.TaxmanF. S. (2015). Misalignment in supervision: Implementing risk/needs assessment instruments in probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548447
90.
VoorhisP. V. (2012). On behalf of women offenders: Women’s place in the science of evidence-based practices (Vollmer Award Address). Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x
WilliamsJ. M.SpencerZ.WilsonS. K. (2020). I am not your felon: Decoding the trauma, resilience, and recovering mothering of formerly incarcerated Black women. Crime & Delinquency, 67(8), 1103–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720974316
