This study observes the spatial distribution of robbery using a multi-level framework to further understand the unique contribution of both micro-places and neighborhoods to the spatial variability of crime patterns. Mixed-effects regression models were estimated to determine if the influence of spatial interdependence measured with a spatial lag variable at street segments had a random effect between Chicago’s community areas. The variance parameters guided an exploratory spatial data analysis which revealed clusters of robbery patterns which were larger than crime hot spots and often nested within neighborhoods. We found there is an important distinction between places in Chicago where the spatial transmissibility of robberies is most acutely experienced across entire neighborhoods or within the immediate proximity of certain micro-places.
AndresenM. A.MallesonN.SteenbeekW.TownsleyM.VandeviverC. (2020). Minimum geocoding match rates: An International study of the impact of data and areal unit sizes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34, 1306–1322.
2.
AnselinL.CohenJ.CookD.GorrW.TitaG. (2000). Spatial analyses of crime. Criminal Justice, 4, 213–262.
3.
AppleyardD. (1981). Livable streets. University of California Press.
4.
BalbiA.GuerryA. M. (1829). Statistique comparèe de L’ètata de L’instruction et du nombre des crimes dans les divers arrondissements des acadèmies et des cours royales de France. Everat.
5.
BernascoW.BlockR. (2011). Robberies in Chicago: A Block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 33–57.
6.
BernascoW.ElffersH. (2010). Statistical analysis of spatial crime data. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 699–724). Springer.
7.
BernascoW.SteenbeekW. (2017). More places than crimes: Implications for evaluating the law of crime concentration at Place. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 451–467.
8.
BlackD. J. (1970). Production of crime rates. American Sociological Review, 35, 733–748.
9.
BragaA. A.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V. (2011). The Relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: A longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and Block faces in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 7–32.
10.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28.
11.
BursikR. J.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books.
12.
Chicago Fact Book Consortium. (1990). Local community fact book: Chicago metropolitan area. Academy Chicago Publishers.
13.
DeryolR.WilcoxP.LoganM.WooldredgeJ. (2016). Crime places in context. An illustration of the multi-level nature of Hot Spot Development. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 305–325.
FingletonB.Le GalloJ. (2008). Estimating spatial models with endogenous variables, a spatial lag and spatially dependent disturbances: Finite sample properties. Papers in Regional Science: The Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 87, 319–339.
16.
GrannisR. (1998). The importance of Trivial streets: Residential streets and residential segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1530–1564.
17.
GrekousisG. (2020). Spatial Analysis Methods and practice. Describe-explore-explain through GIS. Cambridge University Press.
18.
GroffE. R.WeisburdD.YangS. M. (2010). Is it important to examine crime trends at a Local “Micro” Level?: A longitudinal analysis of Street to Street variability in crime trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 7–32.
19.
HabermanC. P.SorgE. T.RatcliffeJ. H. (2018). The seasons they are a changin’: Testing for seasonal effects of potentially criminogenic places on street robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(3).
20.
HippJ.BoessenA. (2013). Egohoods as waves washing across the city: A new measure of “neighborhoods”. Criminology, 51, 287–327.
21.
HippJ. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood Structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72, 659–680.
22.
HippJ. R.KimY. A.WoJ. C. (2020). Micro-Scale, Meso-Scale, Macro-Scale, and temporal scale: Comparing the relative importance for robbery risk in New York City. Justice Quarterly, 38, 1–25.
23.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books.
24.
JendrykeM.McClureS. C. (2019). Mapping crime—Hate crimes and hate groups in the USA: A Spatial analysis with gridded data. Applied Geography, 111, 102072.
25.
JonesR. W.PridemoreW. A. (2019). Toward an integrated multilevel theory of crime at Place: Routine activities, social disorganization, and the Law of Crime Concentration. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35, 543–572.
26.
KimY. A.HippJ. R. (2018). Physical boundaries and city boundaries: Consequences for crime patterns on street segments?Crime and Delinquency, 64, 227–254.
27.
KimY.-A.HippJ. R. (2020a). Pathways: Examining Street network configurations, structural characteristics and spatial crime patterns in Street segments. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 725–752.
28.
KimY.-A.HippJ. R. (2020b). Street Egohood: An alternative perspective of measuring neighborhood and spatial patterns of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 29–66.
29.
KirkD. S.PapachristosA. V. (2011). Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1190–1233.
30.
LambertD. M.BrownJ. P.FloraxR. J. G. (2010). A Two-Step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: Theory, small sample performance and an application. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 241–252.
31.
LightM. T.HarrisC. T. (2012). Race, space, and violence: Exploring Spatial Dependence in structural covariates of white and Black Violent Crime in US Counties. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 559–586.
32.
MietheT. D.MeierR. F. (1994). Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. State University of New York Press.
33.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of Urban Violence. Criminology, 39, 517–558.
34.
OpenshawS. (1983). The modifiable areal unit problem. Geobooks.
35.
OrdJ. K.GetisA. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis, 27, 286–306.
36.
O’BrienD. T. (2019). The action is everywhere, but greater at more localized spatial scales: Comparing concentrations of crime across addresses, streets, and neighborhoods. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56, 339–377.
37.
O’BrienD. T.CiomekA.TuckerR. (2022). How and why is crime more concentrated in some neighborhoods than others? A New Dimension to Community Crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38, 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09495-9
38.
O’BrienD. T.WinshipC. (2017). The gains of greater granularity: The presence and persistence of problem properties in urban neighborhoods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 649–674.
39.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W. (1925). The city. University of Chicago Press.
40.
ReissA. J. (1986). Why are communities important in understanding crime?Crime and Justice, 8, 1–33.
41.
RiceK. J.SmithW. R. (2002). Socioecological models of automotive theft: Integrating routine activity and social disorganization approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 304–336.
42.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. The University of Chicago Press.
43.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “Neighborhood Effects” Social Processes and New Directions in Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
44.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
45.
SchnellC.BragaA. A.PizaE. L. (2017). The influence of community areas, neighborhood clusters, and street segments on the spatial variability of violent crime in Chicago. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 469–496.
46.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot Spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the Criminology of Place. Criminology, 27, 27–56.
47.
SongJ.SpicerV.BrantinghamP. (2013). The edge effect: Exploring high crime zones near residential neighborhoods. [Conference session]. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Seattle, WA, pp.245–250. doi: 10.1109/ISI.2013.6578828
48.
SteenbeekW.WeisburdD. (2016). Where the action is in crime? An examination of variability of crime across different spatial units in the Hague, 2001–2009. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 449–469.
49.
TillyerM. S.WilcoxP.WalterR. J. (2021). Crime generators in context: Examining ‘Place in neighborhood’ propositions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 517–546.
WeisburdD. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of Place. Criminology, 53, 133–157.
52.
WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. (2009). Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology. Springer.
53.
WeisburdD.BushwayS.LumC.YangS. M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A Longitudinal Study of street segments in the City of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–322.
54.
WeisburdD.GroffE. R.YangS. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press.
55.
WhyteW. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. The University of Chicago Press.
56.
WilcoxP.TillyerM. S. (2018). Place and neighborhood contexts. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Connecting crime to place: New directions in theory and policy (pp. 121–142). Transaction Publishers.
57.
WilcoxP.LandK. C.HuntS. C. (2003). Criminal circumstance: A dynamic multicontextual criminal opportunity theory. Walter de Gruyster.
58.
WrightR. T.DeckerS. H. (1997). Armed robbers in action: Stickups and street culture. University Press of New England.
