This study examines the extent to which crime concentrations occur at micro places, in order to test Weisburd’s law of crime concentration at places, in two large Belgian cities. Police-registered crime data for the period 2004–2012 were used. Analyses were conducted at the grid level (using 200 meters by 200 meters grid cells), as a proxy for behavior settings. This study assesses Weisburd’s theoretical proposition and by (partly) replicating prior empirical research, we conclude that the findings are in line with those from prior studies regarding crime concentration at micro places. Finally, opportunities and avenues for future research on crime places are discussed.
AndresenM. A. (2016).
An area-based nonparametric spatial point pattern test: The test, its application, and the future. Methodological Innovations,
9, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2059799116630659
2.
AndresenM. A.LinningS. J. (2012).
The (in)appropriateness of aggregating across crime types. Applied Geography,
35, 275–282.
3.
AndresenM. A.MallesonN. (2011).
Testing the stability of crime patterns: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
48, 58–82.
4.
BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. N.PauwelsL. J. R.WeermanF. M. (2013).
Adolescent delinquency and diversity in behavior settings. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology,
46(3), 357–378. doi:10.1177/0004865813490949
5.
BernascoW.SteenbeekW. (2017).
More places than crimes: Implications for evaluating the law of crime concentration at place. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33(3), 451–467. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9324-7
6.
BragaA.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V. (2010).
The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
26(1), 33–53.
7.
BruinsmaG. J. N.PauwelsL. J. R. (2018). The added value of the criminology of place to the research agenda of environmental criminology: Core propositions for unexplained mechanisms. In WeisburdD.EckJ. (Eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy (pp. 67–95).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
8.
ByrneJ. M.SampsonR. J. (1986). The social ecology of crime.
New York, NY:
Springer-Verlag.
9.
CovingtonJ.TaylorR. B. (1991).
Fear of crime in urban residential neighborhoods. The Sociological Quarterly,
32(2), 231–249.
10.
CurielR. P.BishopS. (2016).
A measure of the concentration of rare events. Scientific Reports,
6(1), 1–6.
11.
DarkS. J.BramD. (2007).
The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography,
31(5), 471–479.
12.
EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place. Crime Prevention Studies 4.
Monsey, NY:
Willow Tree Press.
13.
FavarinS. (2018).
This must be the place (to commit a crime). Testing the law of crime concentration in Milan, Italy. European Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1477370818757700
14.
GebruT.KrauseJ.WangY.ChenD.DengJ.Lieberman AldenE.Fei-FeiL. (2017).
Using deep learning and Google Street View to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
114(50), 13108–13113. doi:10.1073/pnas.1700035114
15.
GerellM. (2017).
Smallest is better? The spatial distribution of arson and the modifiable areal unit problem. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33, 293–318.
16.
GillC.WooditchA.WeisburdD. (2017).
Testing the “law of crime concentration at place” in a suburban setting: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33, 519–545.
17.
GlaeserE. L.KominersS. D.LucaM.NaikN. (2018).
Big data and big cities: The promises and limitations of improved measures of urban life. Economic Inquiry,
56(1), 114–137.
18.
HempelC. G. (1963). Explanation and prediction by covering laws. In B. Baumrin (Ed.), Philosophy of science: The Delaware seminar (
Vol. 1, pp. 107–133).
New York, NY:
John Wiley and Sons.
19.
JefferyC. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design.
Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.
20.
LeeY. (2017). Comparing measures of the concentration of crime at places and times (PhD thesis), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
21.
LeeY.EckJ. E.SooHyunO.MartinezN. N. (2017).
How concentrated is crime at places? A systematic review from 1970 to 2015. Crime Science,
6(6), 1–16.
22.
MadensenT. D.EckJ. E. (2013). Crime places and place management. In CullenF.WilcoxP. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of criminological theory (pp. 554–578).
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
23.
MallesonN.AndresenM. A. (2015).
The impact of using social media data in crime rate calculations: Shifting hot spots and changing spatial patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science,
42(2), 112–121.
24.
MallesonN.AndresenM. A. (2016).
Exploring the impact of ambient population measures on London crime hotspots. Journal of Criminal Justice,
46, 52–63.
25.
McNeeleyS.WarnerJ. J. (2015).
Replication in criminology: A necessary practice. European Journal of Criminology,
12(5), 581–597. doi:10.1177/1477370815578197
26.
MeloS. N.MatiasL. F.AndresenM. A. (2015).
Crime concentrations and similarities in spatial crime patterns in a Brazilian context. Applied Geography,
62, 314–324.
27.
NaginD. S.LandK. C. (1993).
Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology,
31(3), 327–362.
28.
NewmanO. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through environmental design.
New York, NY:
Macmillan.
29.
OberwittlerD.WikströmP.-O. H. (2009). Why smaller is better: Advancing the study of the role of behavioral contexts in crime causation. In WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. N. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology (pp. 36–60).
New York, NY:
Springer Science Business Media LLC.
30.
O’BrienD. T.WinshipC. (2017).
The gains of greater granularity: The presence and persistence of problem properties in urban neighborhoods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33(3), 649–674. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9330-9
31.
OpenshawS. (1984).
Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,
16(1), 17–31. doi:10.1068/a160017
32.
OppK. D. (2011).
Modeling micro-macro relationships: Problems and solutions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
35(1–3), 209–234.
33.
OppK.-D. (2014). Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Eiführung in Probleme ihrer Theorienbildung und praktischen Anwendung, 7. Auflage.
Wiesbaden, Germany:
Springer.
34.
ParriL. (2014). Explanation in the social sciences: A theoretical and empirical introduction.
Soveria Mannelli, Italy:
Rubbettino.
35.
PayneT. C. (2018). Place managers motivations and crime prevention. In WeisburdD.EckJ. E. (Eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in. theory and policy (pp. 145–156).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
36.
PierceG. L.SpaarS.BriggsL. B. R. (1988). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications.
Boston, MA:
Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.
37.
ReissA. J.TonryM. (1986). Communities and crime: A review of research (
Vol. 8).
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
38.
RummensA.HardynsW.PauwelsL. J. R. (2017).
The use of predictive analysis in spatiotemporal crime forecasting: Building and testing a model in an urban context. Applied Geography,
86, 255–261. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.011
39.
SchnellC.BragaA. A.PizaE. L. (2017).
The influence of community areas, neighborhood clusters, and street segments on the spatial variability of violent crime in Chicago. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33(3), 469–496. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9313-x.
40.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989).
Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology,
27(1), 27–55.
41.
StarkR. (1987).
Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology,
25(4), 893–910.
42.
SteenbeekW.WeisburdD. (2015).
Where the action is in crime? An examination of variability of crime across different spatial units in The Hague, 2001–2009. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
32(3), 449–469.
43.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
44.
TelepC. W.WeisburdD. (2018). Crime concentrations at places. In BruinsmaG. J. N.JohnsonS. D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 579–599). New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
45.
VandeviverC.SteenbeekW. (2017).
The (in)stability of residential burglary patterns on street segments: The case of Antwerp, Belgium 2005–2016. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10940-017-9371-8.
46.
WeisburdD. (2015).
The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology,
53(2), 133–157.
47.
WeisburdD.AmranS. (2014).
The law of concentration of crime at place: The case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Police Practice & Research,
15, 101–114.
48.
WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. N. (2009). Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology.
New York, NY:
Springer Science Business Media LLC.
49.
WeisburdD.BruinsmaG. J. N.BernascoW. (2009). Units of analysis in geographic criminology: Historical developments, critical issues, and open questions. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. J. N. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media LLC.
50.
WeisburdD.BushwayS.LumC.YangS.-M. (2004).
Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology,
42(2), 283–321.
51.
WeisburdD.EckJ. (2018). Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
52.
WeisburdD.EckJ.BragaA.TelepC.CaveB.BowersK., … YangS.-M. (2016). Place matters: Criminology for the 21st century.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
53.
WeisburdD.GroffE. R.YangS.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
54.
WeisburdD.ShayM.AmramS.ZamirR. (2018). The relationship between social disorganization and crime at the micro geographic level: Findings from Tel Aviv-Yafo using Israeli census data. In D. Weisburd & J. E. Eck (Eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy (pp. 97–119). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
WikströmP.-O. H. (2007). The social ecology of crime: The role of the environment in crime causation. In SchneiderH.-J. (Ed.), Internationales Handbuch der Kriminologie.
Berlin, Germany:
Walter de Gruyter.
56.
WikströmP. O. H.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime.
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
57.
WilcoxP.EckJ. E. (2011).
Criminology of the unpopular. Criminology & Public Policy,
10(2), 473–482.
58.
WortleyR. (2001).
A classification of techniques for controlling situational precipitators of crime. Security Journal,
14(4), 63–82.
