Members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other gender and sexual minority (LGBTQ+) community are disproportionately affected by illicit substance use, yet sexual orientation and gender identity are largely omitted from criminology frameworks. LGBTQ+ identity is incorporated into Akers’ Social Structure-Social Learning (SSSL) model to suggest that existing disparate substance use patterns may be attributed to variation in substance-related definitions, peer models, and reinforcement. Data from 2,349 young adults were used to estimate structural equations models. LGBTQ+ respondents reported greater substance use than peers. Consistent with theoretical expectations, this relationship was fully mediated by social learning constructs. This study justifies incorporating sexual orientation and gender identity into the SSSL model and suggests peer-based substance use interventions are particularly influential within the LGBTQ+ community.
AdamsJ.AsiasigaL.NevilleS. (2022). Justifications for heavy alcohol use among gender and sexually diverse people. Global Public Health, 17(9), 2018–2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1957492
2.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
3.
AkersR. L. (2017). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Routledge.
4.
AlmeidaJ.JohnsonR. M.CorlissH. L.MolnarB. E.AzraelD. (2009). Emotional distress among LGBT youth: The influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9397-9
5.
BelknapJ. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
6.
BellairP. E.RoscignoV. J.VélezM. B. (2003). Occupational structure, social learning, and adolescent violence. In AkersR. L.JensenG. F. (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime (1st ed., pp. 197–225). Routledge.
7.
BollenK. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316.
8.
BränströmR.PachankisJ. E. (2018). Sexual orientation disparities in the co-occurrence of substance use and psychological distress: A national population-based study (2008-2015). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1491-4
BurrussG. W.BosslerA. M.HoltT. J. (2013). Assessing the mediation of a fuller social learning model on low self-control’s influence on software piracy. Crime and Delinquency, 59(8), 1157–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712437915
11.
CochranS. D.GrellaC. E.MaysV. M. (2012). Do substance use norms and perceived drug availability mediate sexual orientation differences in patterns of substance use? Results from the California quality of life survey II. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(4), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.675
12.
ComptonD. L.MeadowT.SchiltK. (Eds.). (2018). Other, please specify: Queer methods in sociology. University of California Press.
13.
CooperD. T.KleinJ. L. (2018). College students’ online pornography use: Contrasting general and specific structural variables with social learning variables. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9424-4
14.
CoulterR. W.BlosnichJ. R.BukowskiL. A.HerrickA. L.SiconolfiD. E.StallR. D. (2015). Differences in alcohol use and alcohol-related problems between transgender- and nontransgender-identified young adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 154, 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.006
15.
CramerR. J.JohnsonJ. C.CrosbyJ. W.HendersonC. E.La GuardiaA. C.StroudC. H. (2016). Personality, coping and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual community members. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 272–278.
16.
DalyK.Chesney-LindM. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497–538.
17.
DemantD.HidesL.KavanaghD. J.WhiteK. M.WinstockA. R.FerrisJ. (2016). Differences in substance use between sexual orientations in a multi-country sample: Findings from the Global Drug Survey2015. Journal of Public Health, 39(3), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw069
18.
DeMartinoC. H.RiceR. E.SaltzR. (2015). An applied test of the social learning theory of deviance to college alcohol use. Journal of Health Communication, 20(4), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.988384
19.
DrazdowskiT. K.PerrinP. B.TrujilloM.SutterM.BenotschE. G.SnipesD. J. (2016). Structural equation modeling of the effects of racism, LGBTQ discrimination, and internalized oppression on illicit drug use in LGBTQ people of color. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 159, 255–262. 2016.
20.
DuncanD. T.HatzenbuehlerM. L.JohnsonR. M. (2014). Neighborhood-level LGBT hate crimes and current illicit drug use among sexual minority youth. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 135, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.11.001
21.
DurkinK. F.WolfeT. W.ClarkG. A. (2005). College students and binge drinking: An evaluation of social learning theory. Sociological Spectrum, 25(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/027321790518681
22.
FelixS. N.HoyleJ.PosickC.MillerB. L.StognerJ. (2015). Deconstructing the LGBT-victimization association: The case of sexual assault and alcohol-related problems. Journal of Family Strengths, 15(1), 1–31.
23.
FelnerJ. K.WisdomJ. P.WilliamsT.KatuskaL.HaleyS. J.JunH. J.CorlissH. L. (2020). Stress, coping, and context: Examining substance use among LGBTQ young adults with probable substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 71(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900029
24.
FloresA. R.LangtonL.MeyerI. H.RomeroA. P. (2020). Victimization rates and traits of sexual and gender minorities in the United States: Results from the National Crime Victimization Survey, 2017. Science Advances, 6(40), eaba6910.
25.
FriedmanM. S.MarshalM. P.GuadamuzT. E.WeiC.WongC. F.SaewycE.StallR. (2011). A meta-analysis of disparities in childhood sexual abuse, parental physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority individuals. American Journal of Public Health, 101(8), 1481–1494.
26.
GibsonC. L.PolesT. B.AkersR. L. (2010). A partial test of social structure social learning: Neighborhood disadvantage, differential association with delinquent peers, and delinquency. In DeLisiM.BeaverK. M. (Eds.), Criminological theory: A life-course approach (pp. 133–148). Jones and Bartlett.
27.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.
28.
HarrisonT. W. (2003). Adolescent homosexuality and concerns regarding disclosure. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 107–112.
29.
HendricksM. L.TestaR. J. (2012). A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: An adaptation of the minority stress model. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 43(5), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029597
30.
HollisL. P.McCallaS. A. (2013). Bullied back in the closet: Disengagement of LGBT employees facing workplace bullying. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture, 4(2), 6–16.
31.
HoltT. J.BurrussG. W.BosslerA. M. (2010). Social learning and cyber-deviance: Examining the importance of a full social learning model in the virtual world. Journal of Crime and Justice, 33(2), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2010.9721287
32.
KahleL. (2018). Feminist and queer criminology: A vital place for theorizing LGBTQ youth. Sociology Compass, 12(3), e12564.
33.
KheyD. N.StognerJ.MillerB. L. (2013). Emerging trends in drug use and distribution (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
34.
KimE.AkersR. L.YunM. (2013). A cross-cultural test of social structure and social learning: alcohol use among South Korean adolescents. Deviant Behavior, 34(11), 895–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.782787
35.
KimE.ParkJ. (2012). An examination of Akers’ social structure and social learning model with PHDCN Data. Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, 8(4), 384–390.
36.
KleinF.SepekoffB.WolfT. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1-2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v11n01_04
37.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
38.
KruisN. E.SeoC.KimB. (2020). Revisiting the empirical status of social learning theory on substance use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(4), 666–683.
39.
Lanza-KaduceL.CapeceM. (2003). Social structure/social learning theory (SSSL) and binge drinking: A specific test of an integrated theory. In AkersR. L.JensenG. F. (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century (pp. 179–196). Routledge.
40.
LeeG.AkersR. L.BorgM. J. (2004). Social learning and structural factors in adolescent substance use. Western Criminology Review, 5(1), 17–34.
41.
LeeM. A. (2012). Smoke signals: A history of marijuana—medicinal, recreational, and scientific. Scribner.
42.
LiC. K. W.HoltT. J.BosslerA. M.MayD. C. (2016). Examining the mediating effects of social learning on the low self-control—cyberbullying relationship in a youth sample. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.1004023
43.
LiK. W. (2019). The applicability of social structure and social learning theory to explain severe intimate partner violence perpetration across national contexts. [Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University]. MSU Libraries. https://doi.org/10.25335/00fw-hq06
44.
LivingstonN. A.ChristiansonN.CochranB. N. (2016). Minority stress, psychological distress, and alcohol misuse among sexual minority young adults: A resiliency-based conditional process analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 63, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.011
45.
LivingstonN. A.FlentjeA.HeckN. C.Szalda-PetreeA.CochranB. N. (2017). Ecological momentary assessment of daily discrimination experiences and nicotine, alcohol, and drug use among sexual and gender minority individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(12), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000252
46.
LivingstonN. A.OostK. M.HeckN. C.CochranB. N. (2015). The role of personality in predicting drug and alcohol use among sexual minorities. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000034
47.
LoweC. C.StognerJ. M.MillerB. L. (2020). Spice use among adolescents in the United States: A national profile of synthetic cannabinoid users. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 29(2), 119–128.
48.
LowryP. B.ZhangJ.WangC.SiponenM. (2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and Social Learning Model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962–986. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2830405
49.
MericleA. A.CarricoA. W.HembergJ.de GuzmanR.StallR. (2020). Several common bonds: Addressing the needs of gay and bisexual men in LGBT-specific recovery housing. Journal of Homosexuality, 67, 793–815.
50.
MessmanJ. B.LeslieL. A. (2019). Transgender college students: Academic resilience and striving to cope in the face of marginalized health. Journal of American College Health, 67(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1465060
51.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
52.
MohrJ. J.KendraM. S. (2011). Revision and extension of a multidimensional measure of sexual minority identity: The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022858
53.
MortonM. H.SamuelsG. M.DworskyA.PatelS. (2018). Missed opportunities: LGBTQ youth homelessness in America. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
54.
NusserS. P.AnackerK. B. (2013). What sexuality is this place? Building a framework for evaluating sexualized space: The Case of Kansas City, Missouri. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35, 173–193.
55.
OrcuttJ. D.SchwabeA. M. (2012). Gender, race/ethnicity, and deviant drinking: A longitudinal application of social structure and social learning theory. Sociological Spectrum, 32(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2012.628553
56.
Phillips IiG.FeltD.McCuskeyD. J.MarroR.BroschartJ.NewcombM. E.WhittonS. W. (2020). Engagement with LGBTQ community moderates the association between victimization and substance use among a cohort of sexual and gender minority individuals assigned female at birth. Addictive Behaviors, 107, 106414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106414
57.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.Thomas WinfreeL.MadensenT. D.DaigleL. E.FearnN. E.GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis.Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802.
RukusJ.StognerJ.MillerB. (2017). LGBT novel drug use as contextualized through control, strain, and learning theories. Social Science Quarterly, 98(5), 1711–1730.
60.
RussellS. T.RyanC.ToomeyR. B.DiazR. M.SanchezJ. (2011). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adolescent school victimization: Implications for young adult health and adjustment. Journal of School Health, 81(5), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00583.x
61.
ScannapiecoM.PainterK. R.BlauG. (2018). A comparison of LGBTQ youth and heterosexual youth in the child welfare system: Mental health and substance abuse occurrence and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 39–46.
62.
SchaeferB. P.VitoA. G.MarcumC. D.HigginsG. E.RickettsM. L. (2015). Examining adolescent cocaine use with social learning and self-control theories. Deviant Behavior, 36(10), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.977178
63.
SchulerM. S.CollinsR. L. (2019). Early alcohol and smoking initiation: A contributor to sexual minority disparities in adult use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(6), 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.020
64.
SolakogluO.YuksekD. A. (2020). Delinquency among Turkish adolescents: Testing Akers’ social structure and social learning theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(5), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19897400
65.
StognerJ.MillerB. L. (2021). Exploring the relationships between sexual orientation and gender identity and youth synthetic cannabinoid use. Substance Use & Misuse, 56(2), 327–332.
66.
StognerJ.PattersonC. (2022). Suicidal ideation, planning, and attempts among synthetic cannabinoid users across different demographic subgroups. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 43, 323–330.
67.
StognerJ.SarveyL.LoweC. C.HupliA.MillerB. L. (2021). Sexual orientation and synthetic cannabinoid use: Examining the role of bullying victimization. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2021.1972186
TolleH. (2017). Gang affiliation as a measure of social structure in social structure social learning theory. Deviant Behavior, 38(8), 870–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1206712
70.
TuplerL. A.ZappD.DeJongW.AliM.O’RourkeS.LooneyJ.SwartzwelderH. S. (2017). Alcohol-related blackouts, negative alcohol-related consequences, and motivations for drinking reported by newly matriculating transgender college students. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 41(5), 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13358
71.
VerrillS. W. (2005). Social structure and social learning in delinquency: A test of Akers’ social structure-social learning model. [Doctoral Dissertations, University of South Florida]. USF Graduate Theses & Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/894/
72.
WhaleyR. B.SmithJ. M.Hayes-SmithR. (2011). Teenage drug and alcohol use: Comparing individual and contextual effects. Deviant Behavior, 32(9), 818–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538351
73.
WillgingC. E.IsraelT.LeyD.TrottE. M.DeMariaC.JoplinA.SmileyV. (2016). Coaching mental health peer advocates for rural LGBTQ people. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 20(3), 214–236.
74.
WoodsJ. B. (2014). Queering criminology: Overview of the state of the field. In PetersonD.PanfilV. (Eds.), Handbook of LGBT communities, crime, and justice (pp. 15–41). Springer Science + Business Media.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
