The study is focused on the reentry/resettlement problems that are faced by ex-prisoners in the Czech Republic (CR). Findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 26 ex-prisoners and 30 social workers who provide social services in prisons and after the release. Based on the data, which were coded inductively employing qualitative content analysis, several post-prison issues emerged: (1) material deprivation and insecurity regarding housing, subsistence, and stable employment; (2) debts and enforcement proceedings; (3) prisonisation effect; (4) health issues; (5) relationships with family and significant others; (6) drug abuse; (7) meaningful leisure time. Particularly, more attention was given to housing, subsistence, stable employment, and debts and enforcement proceedings because, compared to other countries, these issues have their specifics in the CR. Findings, interpreted through the optics of intersectionality, suggest that the Czech social policies regarding ex-prisoners are focused on a one or selection of factors, instead on the complex interplay of them, as well as not properly targeted and delivered in the right time. To improve the situation, the better system of social services financing that would address the ex-prisoners’ complex needs must be implemented along with the housing first policy and more accessible personal bankruptcy.
AhmedA. M.LångE. (2017). The employability of ex-offenders: A field experiment in the Swedish labor market. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 6, 1.
2.
AlósR.EstebanF.JódarP.MiguélezF. (2015). Effects of prison work programmes on the employability of ex-prisoners. European Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 35–50.
3.
BaileyR.BrakeM. (Eds.) (1977). Introduction: Social work in the welfare state. In Radical social work (pp. 1–12). Edward Arnold.
4.
BaumanZ. (2005). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Open University Press.
5.
BegunA. L.EarlyT. J.HodgeA. I. (2016). Mental health and substance abuse service engagement by men and women during community reentry following incarceration. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43, 207–218.
6.
BéjoZ. (2018). Závěrečná evaluační zpráva z projektu Světlá šance. Volonté.
7.
BéjoZ.CmárM.SchneiderováM. (2019). Závěrečná evaluační zpráva z projektu Revenant. Volonté.
8.
BelenkoS. (2006). Assessing released inmates for substance-abuse-related service needs. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 94–113.
9.
BinswangerI. A.NowelsC.CorsiK. F.GlanzJ.LongJ.BoothR. E.SteinerJ. F. (2012). Return to drug use and overdose after release from prison: A qualitative study of risk and protective factors. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 7(1), 3.
10.
BreeseJ. R.Ra’elK.GrantG. K. (2000). No place like home: A qualitative investigation of social support and its effects on recidivism. Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Research, 2, 1–21.
11.
BumillerK. (2015). Bad jobs and good workers: The hiring of ex-prisoners in a segmented economy. Theoretical Criminology, 19(3), 336–354.
12.
BunnR. (2019). Intersectional needs and reentry: Re-conceptualizing ‘multiple and complex needs’ post-release. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 19, 328–345.
13.
BurchM. (2017). (Re)entry from the bottom up: Case study of a critical approach to assisting women coming home from prison. Critical Criminology, 25(3), 357–374.
14.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
15.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
16.
DavisC.BahrS. J.WardC. (2013). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(4), 446–469.
17.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2011). Contemporary critical criminology. Routledge.
18.
DohertyS.ForresterP.BrazilA.MathesonF. I. (2014). Finding their way: Conditions for successful reintegration among women offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(7), 562–586.
19.
FassinD. (2017). Prison worlds: An ethnography of the carceral condition. Polity.
20.
FergusonI.WoodwardR. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Policy Press.
21.
FritzonK.MillerS.BarghD.HollowsK.OsborneA.HowlettA. (2021). Understanding the relationships between trauma and criminogenic risk using the risk-need-responsivity model. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 30, 294–323.
22.
FróisC. (2017). Female imprisonment: An ethnography of everyday life in confinement. Palgrave Macmillan. Palgrave studies in prisons and penology).
23.
GarrettP. M. (2016). Confronting neoliberal penality: Placing prison reform and critical criminology at the core of social work’s social justice agenda. Journal of Social Work, 16(1), 83–103.
24.
GrayD. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world. SAGE Publications.
25.
GriffinA. D.TascaM.OrrickE. A. (2020). Getting high after getting out: Understanding the relationship between support, stressors, and drug use among men and women in early reentry. Crime and Delinquency, 66, 1839–1864.
26.
HáblR.TrlifajováL.GajdošA.KoteckýD.FejfarJ. (2021). Proč je u nás 5 milionů exekucí? 20 let historie dluhových pastí. Centrum pro společenské otázky – SPOT.
27.
HammettT. M.RobertsC.KennedyS. (2001). Health-related issues in prisoner reentry. Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 390–409.
28.
HaneyC. (2012). Prison effects in the era of mass incarceration. The Prison Journal.
29.
HaneyL. (2018). Incarcerated fatherhood: The entanglements of child support debt and mass imprisonment. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 1–48.
30.
HatteryA.SmithE. (2010). Prisoner reentry and social capital. Lexington Books.
31.
JohnsonI. M. (2014). Economic impediments to women’s success on parole: “We need someone on our side.”The Prison Journal, 94, 365–387.
32.
KingS. (2014). Desistance transitions and the impact of probation. Routledge.
33.
KupkaP.WalachV.BrendzováA. (2021). The poverty business: Landlords, illicit practices and reproduction of disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Czechia. Trends in Organized Crime, 24, 227–245.
34.
KurtovicE.RoviraM. (2017). Contrast between Spain and the Netherlands in the hidden obstacles to re-entry into the labour market due to a criminal record. European Journal of Criminology, 14(5), 505–521.
35.
KváčaV.GottwaldováA. (2018). RESTART II. - závěrečná evaluační zpráva. Polytechna Consulting.
LaneJ. (2020). An overview: What we know about incarcerated women and girls. In JHector (Ed.), Women and prison (pp. 1–13). Springer.
38.
LarssonS. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38.
39.
LeBelT. P.BurnettR.MarunaS.BushwayS. (2008). The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159.
40.
LinkN. W. (2019). Criminal justice debt during the prisoner reintegration process: Who has It and how much?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 154–172.
41.
Madoc-JonesI.HughesC.GordenC.DubberleyS.Washington-DyerK.AhmedA.LockwoodK.WildingM. (2018). Rethinking preventing homelessness amongst prison leavers. European Journal of Probation, 10(3), 215–231.
42.
MartinL. (2018). “Free but still walking the yard”: Prisonization and the problems of reentry. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(5), 671–694.
43.
MartinM. S.EljdupovicG.McKenzieK.ColmanI. (2015). Risk of violence by inmates with childhood trauma and mental health needs. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 614–623.
McNeillF. (2019). Mass supervision, misrecognition and the ‘malopticon.’Punishment & Society, 21, 207–230.
46.
MertlJ. (2017). Přerozdělování Welfare: nástroj pomoci, nebo kontroly?Doplněk.
47.
MertlJ. (2021). Prison employment and its conflict with therapeutic and counselling programmes: The experiences of Czech prison personnel. European Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication.
48.
MertlJ. Ř. Í. (2020). „Musíte makat a poslouchat, no“: Vězení, potlačování autonomie a responsibilizace u vězněných a propuštěných osob v ČR. Sociologický časopis, 56: 4, 523–553.
49.
MoranD. (2014). Leaving behind the ‘total institution’? Teeth, transcarceral spaces and (re)inscription of the formerly incarcerated body. Gender Place & Culture, 21(1), 35–51.
50.
PleaceN. (2016). Housing first guide: Europe. FEANTSA.
51.
PleggenkuhleB. (2018). The financial cost of a criminal conviction: Context and consequences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 121–145.
52.
PogrebinM.West-SmithM.WalkerA.UnnithanN. P. (2014). Employment isn’t enough: Financial obstacles experienced by ex-prisoners during the reentry process. Criminal Justice Review, 39, 394–410.
53.
PorporinoF.FabianoE. (2007). Case managing offenders within a motivational framework. In McivorG.RaynorP. (Eds.), Developments in social work with offenders (pp. 184–211). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
54.
PSCR. (2021). Statistická ročenka Vězeňské služby České republiky 2020. Prison Service of the Czech Republic.
55.
RamakersA.NieuwbeertaP.Van WilsemJ.DirkzwagerA. (2017). Not just any job will do: A study on employment characteristics and recidivism risks after release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(16), 1795–1818.
56.
RobbinsC. A.MartinS. S.SurrattH. L. (2009). Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crime and Delinquency, 55, 388–411.
57.
RomanC. G.LinkN. W. (2017). Community reintegration among prisoners with child support obligations: An examination of debt, needs, and service receipt. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28, 896–917.
58.
Rubikon Centrum. (2021). E-mail communication with NGO Rubikon Centrum about their debt statistics.
59.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
60.
SchlingH. (2017). (Re)production: Everyday life in the workers’ dormitory. Society & Space.
61.
SchlingH. (2020). Dormitories: Spatio-termporalities of life-work. In FrejlachováK.MiroslavP.TadeášŘ. (Eds.), Steel cities: Architectures of logistics in East Central Europe (pp. 262–271). Park Books.
62.
SchneedörflerP. (2019). Program finance a VT pořádaný spolkem Lighthouse ve věznici Světlá nad Sázavou: Shrnutí k 31. 12. 2019. Lighthouse.
63.
ShivyV. A.WuJ. J.MoonA. E.MannS. C.HollandJ. G.EachoC. (2007). Ex-offenders reentering the workforce. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 466–473.
64.
SosnaD.BrunclíkováL. (2019). Drinking and dreaming in the dormitories: Workers struggle in times of economic development. Journal of Material Culture, 24(2), 232–250.
65.
StensrudR. H.GilbrideD. D.BruinekoolR. M. (2019). The childhood to prison pipeline: Early childhood trauma as reported by a prison population. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 62, 195–208.
Todd-KvamJ. (2019). An unpaid debt to society: How ‘punishment debt’ affects reintegration and desistance from crime in Norway. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(6), 1478–1497.
68.
TomášekJ.FaridováP.KostelníkováZ.PřesličkováH.RozumJ.ZhřívalováP. (2017). Zaměstnání jako faktor desistence. Institut pro kriminologii a sociální prevenci.
69.
ToušekL.WalachV.KupkaP.TvrdáK.BrendzováA.LuptákĽ.DvořákováT.PlachýO.VankováK. (2018). Labyrintem zločinu a chudoby: kriminalita a viktimizace v sociálně vyloučených lokalitách. Doplněk.
70.
TripodiS. J.KimJ. S.BenderK. (2010). Is employment associated with reduced recidivism? The complex relationship between employment and crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 706–720.
71.
TurbettC. (2014). Doing radical social work. Palgrave Macmillan.
72.
VisherC. A.WinterfieldL.CoggeshallM. B. (2005). Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 295–316.
73.
WacquantL. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society, 3, 95–133.
74.
WacquantL. (2009). Punishing the poor. The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
75.
WacquantL. (2010). Prisoner reentry as myth and ceremony. Dialectical Anthropology, 34(4), 605–620.
76.
WalbyS.ArmstrongJ.StridS. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240.
77.
WallaceB. C.ConnerL. C.Dass-BrailsfordP. (2011). Integrated trauma treatment in correctional health care and community-based treatment upon reentry. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 17, 329–343.
78.
WerthR. (2012). I do what I’m told, sort of: Reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theoretical Criminology, 16(3), 329–346.
79.
WesternB.BragaA. A.DavisJ.SiroisC. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1512–1547.
80.
WilliamsN. H. (2007). Prison health and the health of the public: Ties that bind. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 13, 80–92.
81.
WinkerG.DegeleN. (2011). Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women s Studies, 18(1), 51–66.
82.
WinnickT. A.BodkinM. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled “ex-con.”Deviant Behavior, 29, 295–333.
83.
YoungJ. (1999). The exclusive society. SAGE Publications.
