This study examines deviant identity in relation to youth offending by combining items tapping both self-appraisal and reflected appraisal. In particular, using survey data from 3,446 Korean youth across five waves of the Korea Youth Panel Survey (KYPS), findings from group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) present four distinct offending groups—a high-rate chronic group, stable non-offending group, adolescence-limited group, and declining group. Then, findings from the multinomial logit model reveal that deviant identity is a robust predictor of offending for subgroups of adolescents involved in offending at any level in comparison to stable non-offenders. Accordingly, this study supports the idea that deviant identity should be considered as a prominent predictor of a variety of types of youth offending.
AdamsM. S.JohnsonJ. D.EvansT. D. (1998). Racial differences in informal labeling effects. Deviant Behavior, 19(2), 157–171.
2.
AdamsM. S.RobertsonC. T.Gray RayP.RayM. C. (2003). Labeling and delinquency. Adolescence, 38(149), 171–187.
3.
AgetonS. S.ElliottD. S. (1974). The effects of legal processing on delinquent orientations. Social Problems, 22(1), 87–100.
4.
AsencioE. K.BurkeP. J. (2011). Does incarceration change the criminal identity? A synthesis of labeling and identity theory perspectives on identity change. Sociological Perspectives, 54(2), 163–182.
5.
BachmanJ. G.O’MalleyP. M.JohnstonJ. (1978). Adolescence to adulthood—change and stability in the lives of young men. Institute for Social Research.
6.
BambergM. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3–24.
7.
BartuschD. J.MatsuedaR. L. (1996). Gender, reflected appraisals, and labeling: A cross-group test of an interactionist theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 75(1), 145–176.
8.
BaxT.HlasnyV. (2019). The causes and courses of nonviolent and violent delinquency among South Korean adolescents. Deviant Behavior, 40(7), 816–834.
9.
BeckerH. S. (1963). The outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press.
10.
BernburgJ. G. (2009). Labeling theory. In KrohnM. D.Lizotte HallA. J.PenlyG. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 187–207). Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.
11.
BraithwaiteJ. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
12.
BurkeP. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 18–29.
13.
BynnerJ. M.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G. (1981). Self-esteem and delinquency revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10(6), 407–441.
14.
ChoS. (2021). Modeling the reciprocal relationships between group-based developmental trajectories of peer delinquency and self-reported delinquency during adolescence: An application of interactional theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(2), 234–255.
15.
ChoS.LaceyB. (2021). The impact of life domains on developmental trajectories of peer delinquency among Korean adolescents: A partial test of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency with a group-based trajectory modeling approach. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211016326
16.
ChoS.LaceyB.KimY. (2021). Developmental trajectories of delinquent peer association among Korean adolescents: A latent class growth analysis approach to assessing peer selection and socialization effects on online and offline crimes. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(3), 379–405.
17.
ChoS.LeeJ. R. (2020). Joint growth trajectories of bullying perpetration and victimization among Korean adolescents: Estimating a second-order growth mixture model–factor-of-curves with low self-control and opportunity correlates. Crime & Delinquency, 66(9), 1296–1337.
18.
CooleyC. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Scribners and Sons.
19.
CullenF. T.CullenJ. B. (1978). Toward a paradigm of labeling theory (No. 58). University of Nebraska at Lincoln.
20.
DavisF. (1961). Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 9(2), 120–132.
21.
FarringtonD. P.HawkinsJ. D. (1991). Predicting participation, early onset and later persistence in officially recorded offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 1(1), 1–33.
22.
FelsonR. B. (1980). Communication barriers and the reflected appraisal process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(2), 223–233.
23.
FelsonR. B. (1985). Reflected appraisal and the development of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(1), 71–78.
24.
FelsonR. B. (1989). Parents and the reflected appraisal process: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(6), 965–971.
25.
FelsonR. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self (Vol. 4, pp. 13–38). Erlbaum.
26.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.NaginD. S. (2000). Offending trajectories in a New Zealand birth cohort. Criminology, 38(2), 525–552.
27.
GrasmickH. G.BursikR. J.Jr (1990). Conscience, Significant Others, and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model. Law and Society Review, 24(3), 837–861.
28.
HeimerK. (1996). Gender, interaction, and delinquency: Testing a theory of differential social control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 39–61.
29.
HeimerK.MatsuedaR. L. (1994). Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review, 59(3), 365–390.
30.
HepburnJ. R. (1977). The impact of police intervention upon juvenile delinquents. Criminology, 15(2), 235–262.
31.
HorneyJ.OsgoodD. W.MarshallI. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 655–673.
32.
JensenG. F. (1972). Delinquency and adolescent self-conceptions: A study of the personal relevance of infraction. Social Problems, 20(1), 84–103.
33.
JensenG. F. (1980). Labeling and identity: Toward a reconciliation of divergent findings. Criminology, 18(1), 121–129.
34.
JohnsonC. L.WilcoxP.PetersonS. (2019). Stressed out and strapped: Examining the link between psychological difficulties and student weapon carrying and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(7), 980–998.
35.
KaplanH. B. (1976). Self-attitudes and deviant response. Social Forces, 54(4), 788–801.
36.
KatzJ. (1988). Seductions of Crime: A Chilling Exploration of the Criminal Mind–From Juvenile Delinquency to Cold-blooded Murder. Basic Books
37.
KavishD. R.MullinsC. W.SotoD. A. (2016). Interactionist labeling: Formal and informal labeling’s effects on juvenile delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 62(10), 1313–1336.
38.
KimJ.LeeY. (2019). Does it take a school? Revisiting the influence of first arrest on subsequent delinquency and educational attainment in a tolerant educational background. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(2), 254–302.
39.
KinchJ. W. (1963). A formalized theory of the self-concept. American Journal of Sociology, 68(4), 481–486.
40.
KruegerJ. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 30, pp. 163–240). Academic Press.
41.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69.
42.
Le BlancM. (1997). A generic control theory of the criminal phenomenon: The structural and dynamic statements of an integrative multilayered control theory. Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency, 7, 215–285.
43.
LeeJ. S.TajimaE. A.HerrenkohlT. I.HongS. (2017). Effects of formal and informal deviant labels in adolescence on crime in adulthood. Social Work Research, 41(2), 97–110.
44.
LemertE. (1951). Social pathology. McGraw-Hill
45.
LiuX. (2000). The conditional effect of peer groups on the relationship between parental labeling and youth delinquency. Sociological Perspectives, 43(3), 499–514.
46.
LoflandJ. (1969). Deviance and identity. Prentice Hall.
47.
LopesG.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SchmidtN. M.VasquezB. E.BernburgJ. G. (2012). Labeling and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of formal police intervention on life chances and crime during emerging adulthood. Crime & Delinquency, 58(3), 456–488.
48.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.
49.
MarunaS.LebelT. P.MitchellN.NaplesM. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 271–281.
50.
MatsuedaR. L. (1992). Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American journal of sociology, 97(6), 1577–1611.
51.
MatsuedaR. L.HeimerK. (1997). A symbolic interactionist theory of role-transitions, role-commitments, and delinquency. Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency, 44(3), 163–213.
52.
MatzaD. (1964). Delinquency and Drift. Wiley.
53.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press.
54.
MeadeA. C. (1974). The labeling approach to delinquency: State of the theory as a function of method. Social Forces, 53(1), 83–91.
55.
MenardS.MorseB. J. (1984). A structuralist critique of the IQ-delinquency hypothesis: Theory and evidence. American Journal of Sociology, 89(6), 1347–1378.
56.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.
57.
MowenT. J.BrentJ. J.BomanJ. H.IV (2020). The effect of school discipline on offending across time. Justice Quarterly, 37(4), 739–760.
58.
NaC.PaternosterR. (2019). Prosocial identities and youth violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 84–128.
59.
NaginD. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 139–157.
60.
NaginD. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press.
61.
NaginD. S.LandK. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31(3), 327–362.
62.
NaginD. S.OdgersC. L. (2010). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109–138.
63.
OS.WilcoxP. (2018). Routine activity theory, target congruence, and school context: A multilevel analysis of teacher victimization. Victims and Offenders, 13(3), 349–372.
64.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1157.
65.
PaternosterR.IovanniL. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6(3), 359–394.
66.
PattersonG. R.YoergerK. (1993). Developmental models for delinquent behavior. In HodginsS. (Ed.), Mental disorder and crime (pp. 140–172). Sage Publications, Inc.
67.
PiqueroA. R.FarringtonD. P.BlumsteinA. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research: New analyses of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Cambridge University Press.
68.
RayM. C.DownsW. R. (1986). An empirical test of labeling theory using longitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23(2), 169–194.
69.
RestivoE.LanierM. M. (2015). Measuring the contextual effects and mitigating factors of labeling theory. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 116–141.
70.
ReynoldsS. J.CeranicT. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624.
71.
RocqueM.PosickC.PaternosterR. (2016). Identities through time: An exploration of identity change as a cause of desistance. Justice Quarterly, 33(1), 45–72.
72.
RosenbergM.SimmonsR. G. (1972). Black and white self-esteem: The urban school child. rose monograph series. American Sociological Association.
73.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and stability of delinquency. In ThornberryT. P. (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 133–161).Transaction.
74.
ScimeccaJ. A. (1977). Labeling theory and personal construct theory: Toward the measurement of individual variation. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 68(4), 652–659.
75.
ShraugerJ. S.SchoenemanT. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 549–573.
76.
SparksP.ShepherdR. (1992). Self-Identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assesing the role of identification with “Green Consumerism.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399.
77.
TannenbaumF. (1938). Crime and the community. Ginn and Company.
78.
ThoitsP. A. (1985). Self-labeling processes in mental illness: The role of emotional deviance. American Journal of Sociology, 91(2), 221–249.
79.
TopalliV. (2005). When being good is bad: An expansion of neutralization theory. Criminology, 43(3), 797–836.
80.
TriplettR. A.JarjouraG. R. (1994). Theoretical and empirical specification of a model of informal labeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(3), 241–276.
81.
WardJ. T.KrohnM. D.GibsonC. L. (2014). The effects of police contact on trajectories of violence: A group-based, propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 440–475.
82.
WhiteH. R.BatesM. E.BuyskeS. (2001). Adolescence-limited versus persistent delinquency: Extending Moffitt’s hypothesis into adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(4), 600–609.
83.
WileyS. A.SlocumL. A.EsbensenF. A. (2013). The unintended consequences of being stopped or arrested: An exploration of the labeling mechanisms through which police contact leads to subsequent delinquency. Criminology, 51(4), 927–966.
84.
WolfgangM. E.FiglioR. M.SellinT. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. University of Chicago Press.
85.
ZhangL. (1997). Informal reactions and delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(1), 129–150.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
